Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Driven by care over escalating healthcare costs, there has been
increasing interest in redefining the boundaries between primary and
secondary care. Hospital at home schemes are an alternative to
traditional hospital care. This issue includes two randomised
controlled trials of hospital at home schemes and their associated cost
minimisation studies. On p 1786 Shepperd et al describe few
differences in outcome between hospital at home and inpatient hospital
care for five categories of patients in Northamptonshire. In general
patients preferred being at home, though their carers' views were more
mixed. Similarly, Richards et al found that a hospital at home scheme
in Bristol was similar to routine hospital care in its clinical
outcomes and acceptability to patients (p 1796). The Bristol team also
found that hospital at home was cheaper: care for four patients at home
costs as much as care for three in hospital (p 1802). Shepperd et al,
however, found that costs were not reduced (p 1791).