Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Medicine is a subtle and complicated business, and the
subtleties and complications probably come though more strongly in interactions with patients than in medical journals. After all, fact is
stranger than fiction. But the subtleties of medicine are there in
journals for those (perhaps not many) with time to reflect on
scientific papers.
Consider, first, the study from England that looks at what happens to
patients with low back pain (p 1356). Journals and textbooks say that
"80-90% of attacks of low back pain recover in about six weeks,
irrespective of the administration or type of treatment." How can
this be compatible, wondered the researchers, with population surveys
showing that almost 40% of the adult population has back pain in a
year and that a third of those experience pain for longer than four
weeks. The simple answer is that most patients give up going to see the
doctor even though their pain persists. So the well known fact that
only a small minority of symptoms are presented to doctors can now be
combined with the observation that many patients may learn to live with
symptoms rather than continue to bother doctors
Consider, second, what causes pre-eclampsia? It affects about a third
of pregnancies, but we are hazy on its causes. Great wisdom suggests
that it's something to do with mothers or fetuses and probably both.
Norwegian researchers have been looking at the role of fathers and
discovered that if a woman has a baby by a man who has already fathered
a pre-eclamptic pregnancy in another woman then she has an increased
chance of developing pre-eclampsia (p 1343). And if a woman has a half
sister who had pre-eclampsia, then the risk of her developing
pre-eclampsia is higher if they share fathers than if they share
mothers. A safe conclusion from this and other work is that mothers,
fathers, and fetuses are all important. A more tentative conclusion is
that the results are compatible with studies in mice showing that renin
genes from the father and angiotensin II genes from the mother
contribute to the risk of hypertension in pregnancy.
Consider, third, what you might do if you met an acquaintance with a
new baby and wondered if the baby might be hypothyroid. Would you say
something? Gordon Barclay experienced this dilemma (p 1368). He was not
the acquaintance's doctor. He might be wrong in his diagnosis. He did
what I suspect most doctors would have done and said nothing. A few
days later the acquaintance rang: "I noticed you looking strangely at
my baby and I took her to my doctor. He thinks she is hypothyroid.
Thank you very much for noticing."
These are just some of the subtleties and complexities in this issue of
the journal. Luckily they go on and on, meaning we can publish weekly
for 158 years and yet rarely repeat ourselves.
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+