Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
H A Thiadens a Department of General Practice, Leiden University
Medical Centre, PO Box 2088, 2301 CB Leiden, Netherlands, b Medical Decision Making Unit, Leiden
University Medical Centre, c Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical
Centre, d Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
Academical Medical Centre of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ
Amsterdam, Netherlands, e Department of Lung Diseases, Groningen University Hospital, PO
Box 30001, 9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
Correspondence to: Dr Thiadens
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: To determine the prevalence of asthma and
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients not known to have
these disorders, who present in general practice with persistent cough,
and to ascertain criteria to help general practitioners in diagnosis.
Design: Descriptive study.
Setting: Primary healthcare centre in the
Netherlands.
Subjects: 192 patients aged 18-75 years, not known to
have asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, attending their
general practitioner with cough persisting for at least 2 weeks.
Methods: A diagnosis of asthma or chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease was based on the recurrence of airway symptoms in the
past year accompanied by spirometric measurements (including bronchodilator testing) and methacholine provocation tests. A scoring
formula to estimate the probability of asthma or chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease, based on history and physical examination, was
generated by means of logistic regression.
Results: 74 patients (39%) were classified as having
asthma, 14 (7%) as having chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The
best formula for predicting asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease used scores for three symptoms: (reported) wheeze, (reported)
dyspnoea, and allergen induced symptoms, together with prolonged
expiration, pack years of smoking, and female sex. Variables were
scored 1 when present and 0 when absent, except for allergen induced
symptoms (1.5) and number of pack years of smoking (n/25). With a cut
off value of 3 on the scoring formula, 76% of the patients could be
classified correctly.
Conclusions: About half of patients with persistent
cough who present to a general practitioner have asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. With a simple formula based on three
symptoms and prolonged expiration, pack years of smoking, and female
sex, most patients may be identified correctly in general practice.
|
Key messages
|
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Coughing is the most common symptom in patients attending a general practitioner. In the Netherlands, about 10% of all consultations concern coughing.1 The prevalence of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in these patients is not known. In most cases a diagnosis of acute bronchitis or upper respiratory tract infection is made; a diagnosis of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is rarely considered.2 Asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are more likely if patients have a persistent or recurrent cough as well as other airway symptoms,3-7 but whether general practitioners are more likely to consider asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in these cases is not known. This might have consequences for treatment. Antibiotics are often prescribed for these patients, but bronchodilators or corticosteroids would be more suitable.
We set out to determine the prevalence of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients who attended their general practitioner after coughing for at least a fortnight and who were not known to have asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We also investigated to what extent a diagnosis of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease can be made in general practice just by history taking and physical examination.
| |
Patients and methods |
|---|
The study took place in a primary healthcare centre in which six general practitioners work, serving a population of 12 000. The age and sex distribution of the 8450 patients aged between 18 and 75 who are registered with the practice matches the rest of the country. Patients, aged 18 to 75, who contacted their general practitioner with coughing that had lasted for at least two weeks were invited to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria were diagnosis of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; pregnancy; and cardiovascular or concomitant pulmonary diseases. To make sure that all patients who had been coughing for at least two weeks were included, computerised records of all those attending the general practitioner were checked.
Immediately after patients had consulted their own doctor, they were seen by the investigator (JANH), who saw them again after 2 and 8 weeks. After one year the medical records of all participants were checked to see if other causes of coughing such as postnasal drip, lung cancer, or gastro-oesophageal reflux had been diagnosed. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the medical ethics committee of Leiden University approved the study.
Measurements
Data on respiratory symptoms were collected by means of a
modified Medical Research Council questionnaire at baseline and at 8 weeks.8 Additional questions concerned information about respiratory symptoms (wheeze, coughing, and breathlessness) after contact with non-specific stimuli such as smoke, dust, fog, exercise, and specific allergens (house dust, hay, cats, dogs, birds, guinea pigs, moulds). Subjects were asked about family history of asthma and
personal and family history of atopy. Dyspnoea was defined as reported
breathlessness
an attack of dyspnoea, woken up by dyspnoea, or
persistent dyspnoea
during at least the past 2 weeks. Patients were
asked about current smoking behaviour and cumulative smoking (pack
years of smoking were calculated as the product of years of smoking and
the mean number of cigarettes per day divided by 20).
Definitions
Bronchodilator response was positive if
FEV1 improved
9% of predicted value after 400 µg
salbutamol was inhaled.
12 13
Hyperresponsiveness was
defined as PD20
15.6 µmol methacholine.11 Patients were considered to have asthma if in the previous year they
had had one or more episodes of wheeze, cough, or dyspnoea during the
day or at night lasting for more than 3 weeks and if PD20
15.6 µmol methacholine or bronchodilator response was positive. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was defined as FEV1
<70% of predicted at baseline and <75% after 8 weeks; reversibility at baseline and after 8 weeks <9% predicted; and improvement in FEV1 <12% predicted, either spontaneously or after drugs
were given, after 2 and 8 weeks.14
Statistical analysis
Data for this study were analysed with SPSS 4.0 (SPSS, Chicago, USA). Differences between subjects with and without
asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were analysed with
Student's t tests and non-parametric tests
(Mann-Whitney) as appropriate. Differences in proportions were tested
using
2 tests. As it is often difficult in general
practice to distinguish between asthma and chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease after one or two visits, most analyses combined
asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
coefficients of these variables in the regression equation
were used to generate a scoring formula. For this scoring formula the
probabilities for each value were estimated by logistic regression.
We verified how many subjects were identified correctly by using
different cut off values of the scoring formula. For this purpose, the
observed values according to the scoring formula were divided into six
groups. Probabilities for having asthma or chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease were calculated for each score by using the six group
scores as cut off values. All tests were two sided and P values of
<0.05 were considered significant.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During the period January 1994 to March 1995, 754 patients consulted their general practitioner because of coughing. Sixty four (9%) of these were already known to have asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. One third of the remainder (221) had coughed for at least two weeks and fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Sixteen patients declined to enter the study, and a further 13 were unwilling to undergo a provocation test. The 192 patients participating in the study did not differ in age and sex from the 29 who did not participate. Of the participants, 176 (92%) were challenged with methacholine. Low lung function prevented testing in 13 (7%) subjects. Three patients stopped during the challenge test because of adverse effects.
Table 1 shows the patient characteristics. Seventy four subjects (39%) were identified as having asthma and 14 (7%) as having chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lung function was highest in the subgroup without characteristics of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
|
Twenty four patients (13%) had no history of respiratory symptoms over
the past year. This group contained one person with PD20
3.9 µmol methacholine and three with PD20 of 7.8 or
15.6 µmol methacholine. Men were underrepresented in the study
(38%). The 58 women were more likely to have asthma and were more
hyperresponsive (P<0.01), whereas the 10 men had more pack years of
smoking and a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(P<0.01). Men and women had similar levels of lung function and ages.
Asthma patients were significantly younger than patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (mean age 43.0 (17.3) years v
64.1 (9.1) years; P<0.01). Neither of the two subjects who
used angiotensin converting enzyme drugs (which induce coughing) was
classified as having asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Re-evaluation of the patients' records after one year showed no lung
cancer, gastro-oesophageal reflux, or chronic sinusitis.
Table 2 shows odds ratios for combined asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, adjusted for sex, age, and pack years of smoking. The highest odds for combined asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were found for "asthma attack" during the past two weeks (7.2; 95% confidence interval 2.5 to 22.1). High odds were also found for allergen induced symptoms, prolonged expiration, the current symptoms reported wheeze and dyspnoea, and symptoms provoked by non-specific stimuli. Symptoms such as nocturnal coughing over the past two weeks did not reach significance, nor did childhood symptoms or a family or personal history of atopy. Significant odds were found for wheezing and attacks of dyspnoea over the past year but not for episodes of (nocturnal) coughing over the past year.
A logistic model for predicting asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease combined was constructed by using all clinical variables known to be associated with these diseases, as well as age, sex, current smoking, and pack years of smoking. Significant contributors were current symptoms of wheezing, current symptoms of dyspnoea, allergen induced respiratory symptoms, the current physical sign of a prolonged expiration, female sex, and pack years of smoking. Table 3 presents the logistic regression values of these variables. The B values were used to simplify the scoring formula that predicted the presence of combined asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Variables present received the following values: allergen induced symptoms, 1.5; prolonged expiration, 1; current wheezing, 1; dyspnoea, 1; female sex, 1; pack years of smoking, n/25. The scores obtained by summing these variables ranged from 0.07 to 6.98 for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease combined. Logistic regression was performed again to estimate the probabilities for each score.
|
|
The figure shows results of the scoring formula for all 192 subjects. The higher the score the higher the probability of having asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Table 4 shows the number of subjects for each score level, divided into six score groups, in relation to the probability of having asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The higher the score the higher the probability and the lower the score the lower the probability of having asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A cut off value of 3 provided the highest accuracy (the number of correctly identified patients), identifying 146 out (76%) patients correctly. The positive predictive value was 84% (52/62) and the negative predictive value was 72% (94/130) with this cut off value.
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Findings
The main finding from this study is that asthma or chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease is present in nearly half the patients with coughing for a period of at least 2 weeks attending a general practitioner, and most of these can be identified by history taking and
physical examination only. The best scoring formula was generated from
a few variables. Thus, symptoms such as current wheeze and dyspnoea,
symptoms elicited by allergens, prolonged expiration, cumulative
smoking, and female sex will help the general practitioner to predict
which patients are at risk of having asthma or chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease.
25 mg/ml. The cut off value we used (PD20
15.6 µmol
methacholine) is comparable to a dose of 8 mg/ml histamine.
Possible bias
Since there is no agreed definition for asthma and chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease, these disorders must be defined carefully.15 In the definitions used in this study, airway
obstruction, airway hyperresponsiveness, or significant bronchodilator
response, together with a history of at least one episode of protracted airway symptoms in the past year, were the determinants of a diagnosis. Some of the subjects may have been hyperresponsive only temporarily, but as we measured PD20 at least 4 weeks after the start of
their symptoms, a virus induced hyperresponsiveness is
unlikely.11 Transient hyperresponsiveness after a viral
infection might reflect asthma, perhaps at an early stage. As
hyperresponsiveness (with or without symptoms) has been shown to have a
high predictive value for later development of asthma and a rapid
decline in FEV1,
16 17
recognition of such
patients seems important. The cut off value for PD20 that
we chose is common in clinical settings in Europe, but other studies
have used a cut off value of PD20
3.9 µmol methacholine.
10 18
When we used this value the prevalence
of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease decreased to 35%, still a considerable proportion of the study population. The
"symptom" previous respiratory episodes for at least 3 weeks over
the past year was included in the clinical part of the definition; in
all guidelines it is considered to predict asthma or chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We acknowledge the participation in this study of the general practitioners and the patients from "Wantveld," and we thank Mrs H Bolk-Lucieer for correcting the text and Mrs LM Doeven-Jellema for secretarial support.
Contributors: FWD, HAT and MPS had the original idea for the study. HAT and DSP determined the final study questions. JANH performed physical examinations; JCvH and GHdB helped analyse the data. This paper was written jointly by HAT, DSP, and GHdB, and commented on by the other authors. HAT is guarantor for the paper.
Funding: Glaxo-Wellcome BV, Medical Division, The Netherlands.
Conflict of interest: None.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Read all Rapid Responses