Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Sarah A Stahmer Department of Emergency
Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
19104-4283, USA
Correspondence to: stahmer{at}mail.med.upenn.edu
Emergency medicine is rapidly evolving as a medical
specialty. It provides immediate and universal care to over 90 million patients a year in the United States alone. In addition to life saving
treatment, the emergency department provides a safety net, giving
unrestricted care to people with little or no access to other types of
health care. Recent developments reflect the varied nature of emergency
medicine. These include improvements in emergency management of acute
cardiac ischaemia, identification of victims of domestic violence, and
the use of diagnostic tools such as ultrasound examination by
specialists in emergency medicine.
Topics were chosen after reviewing articles published during the
past two years in those peer reviewed journals commonly referred to by
specialists in emergency medicine. Selection was based on the number of
quality studies published on a particular topic and the topic's actual
or potential impact on clinical practice in emergency medicine. A
Medline search was performed using the terms cardiac markers, domestic
violence, ultrasound, and emergency medicine.
In the United States alone, over six million patients each year
present to the emergency department with chest pain. The goals of the
doctor are to identify rapidly those patients who are candidates for
thrombolytic treatment; to differentiate between patients with chest
pain caused by acute coronary ischaemia and chest pain from other
causes in order to avoid unnecessary admission to hospital; and to
stratify those patients with possible ischaemic chest pain into risk
groups.
In addition to the routine medical history, physical examination, and
12 lead electrocardiography, the specialist in emergency medicine now
has access to a growing number of ancillary tests and technologies that
can help in the management of patients with chest pain. Those which
seem particularly promising include new markers of cardiac ischaemia,
stress testing, and acute perfusion imaging with technetium-99m
labelled sestamibi.
Markers of myocardial necrosis Myoglobin
Troponin
The electrocardiographic exercise stress test has been used
extensively by cardiologists to screen stable patients for ischaemic heart disease. Recent trials show that it can also be useful in managing patients admitted to the emergency department with acute chest
pain.8-11 The goals are to reduce unnecessary admissions to hospital and expedite outpatient investigations. Stress testing is
usually performed in observation units set up in or near the emergency
department, and it is overseen and interpreted by cardiologists. To
date, only low risk patients (determined by negative electrocardiogram, enzyme markers, and telemetry monitoring for variable lengths of time)
have been tested as part of clinical trials. Results have shown that
for this low risk group of patients, stress testing can be performed
safely, and may reduce the number of patients with chest pain admitted
to hospital.
Technetium-99m labelled sestamibi is rapidly gaining acceptance as
a way of detecting myocardial ischaemia in patients with chest pain.
When injected intravenously, 99mTc labelled sestamibi
is taken up by the myocardium in proportion to myocardial blood flow.
Unlike thallium-201, it does not wash out over time, and images taken
up to several hours after administration will reflect myocardial
perfusion at the time of injection (fig 1). The results from several
small prospective trials show that it is highly sensitive and specific
for predicting acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina in
patients with atypical medical histories or electrocardiograms that do
not provide a diagnosis.12-14 Negative predictive values
as high as 94% to 100% have been reported for normal
99mTc labelled sestamibi studies.12-14
Although large scale clinical trials are lacking, 99mTc
labelled sestamibi is a promising agent for use in selected patients
with chest pain.
![]()
Methods
![]()
Screening for acute cardiac ischaemia
Recent advances
Myoglobin and troponin I and T determinations may help early
identification and risk stratification of patients with acute ischaemia
and infarction
Exercise stress testing and technetium-99m labelled sestamibi imaging
can identify patients with acute ischaemic chest pain whose risk of
myocardial infarction and subsequent adverse cardiac events is high
Normal or negative cardiac screening results enable triage to less
intensive monitoring
The emergency department has a potentially important role in
identifying victims of domestic violence and giving access to social
support as well as treatment
"Bedside" ultrasound scanning in the emergency department can help
detect pleural and peritoneal fluid in victims of trauma and
complications of early pregnancy, particularly ectopic pregnancy
![]()
Markers of cardiac ischaemia
specifically, myoglobin,
creatinine kinase, and troponin I and T
have undergone prospective testing of their diagnostic performance in acute myocardial infarction. Available data suggest that although a single creatine kinase MB test
as a screen for acute myocardial infarction is only 50% sensitive when
sampled at the time of the patient's arrival in the emergency
department,1 serial tests over several hours seem to have
better diagnostic sensitivity.2 Sensitivity reached more
than 90% when assayed over three hours and 95% within six hours.2 The results of serum creatine kinase MB tests help specialists in emergency medicine to make clinical decisions, particularly with regard to patients with acute myocardial
infarction.3
Myoglobin is a low molecular weight marker for acute myocardial
infarction and is detectable in serum before creatine kinase MB. In
patients with acute myocardial infarction, serum myoglobin concentrations doubled within two hours of evaluation in the emergency department, and peak values were reached at four hours.4
Serial measurements of myoglobin within the first few hours of the
onset of symptoms are very sensitive for myocardial infarction, but they are much less specific than creatine kinase MB determinations. Carbonic anhydrase III, a protein identified in type I skeletal muscle,
is highly specific for non-cardiac muscle injury, and the ratio of
myoglobin to carbonic anhydrase III has been shown improve the
specificity yet maintain early sensitivity of myoglobin for acute
myocardial infarction. This ratio, when determined within the three
hours of presentation, identified twice as many patients with acute
myocardial infarction as creatine kinase MB.5
Single values of troponin T and I, both highly specific markers of
myocardial injury, are comparatively insensitive early screening tests
for acute myocardial infarction because they are not present in serum
until relatively late.6 Assays of troponin concentrations
may be most useful in stratifying the risk of infarction in patients
with unstable angina. Several reports have suggested that higher
concentrations of troponin in these patients are associated with an
increased risk of cardiac events and death.7 Early markers
of myocardial injury such as myoglobin, combined with more specific
markers such as creatine kinase and troponin, are potentially useful in
identifying acute myocardial infarction and in triage of patients with
chest pain. However, the impact of routine use of these newer markers
(either alone or in combination) in the emergency department is
currently unknown.
![]()
Stress testing
![]()
Technetium-99m sestamibi

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig 1.
Technetium-99m labelled sestamibi scans. Top:
normal scan; vertical long axis (left); horizontal long axis (right).
Bottom: apical defect; vertical long axis (left); horizontal long axis
(right)
| |
Domestic violence |
|---|
Considerable attention has been focused recently on the emergency department's role in identifying and intervening in cases of domestic violence. Recent reports in the United States have shown that between a third and a half of women in surveys undertaken in emergency departments claim to have been abused or assaulted at some time. 15 16 Prospective studies using a variety of screening tools show that 2% to 25% of visits to an emergency department by women of all ages are a direct result of domestic violence.15-18 Because the emergency department is often the first place in which current or potential victims can be identified, there is a growing interest in exploring ways to identify these people and linking them effectively with social services.
"At risk" profile
One approach is to identify high risk individuals and patterns of
injury or complaints, or both, that could serve as indicators to
emergency department staff. Recent studies have shown that domestic
violence is reported in all age groups but is more common in younger
women. Pregnancy, mental or physical handicap, and a history of
substance misuse seem to place women at particular risk.
15 16 18
Although domestic violence has been
reported in all socioeconomic groups, it may be more prevalent in
patients who have no medical insurance or medical assistance. One study looked at the relation between positive screening for domestic violence
and insurance status. Those hospitals looking after the greatest number
of uninsured patients identified domestic violence in 25.7%, while
hospitals in which most patients seen were insured had a rate of
3.3%.18 Time of presentation to the emergency department
is also different for victims of domestic violence. They generally
present at those times when social services are not usually
available.
16 17 19
Screening for violence
In emergency departments, implementation of screening for domestic
violence has had mixed success. One study has shown that incorporating
a structured screening item in the medical record can improve case
detection rates.17 Another institution implemented a
comprehensive protocol consisting of a screening questionnaire at
triage and 24 hour police and social work notification for high risk
people. This ambitious programme failed because staff compliance with
the protocol was poor.20 A telephone follow up programme
for high risk patients was equally unsuccessful in identifying victims
of domestic violence; the few patients detected did not justify the
programme's costs.21
insufficient education in recognising domestic violence, inadequate intervention on
the part of nurses and doctors, lack of 24 hour social service coverage
in emergency departments, and inability of staff to comply with
protocols that are time consuming or complicated.21-23
Future areas of investigation include the development of sensitive and easily administered screening for domestic violence, the institution of
formal education programmes aimed at health professionals working in
emergency departments, and development of cost effective intervention and treatment protocols.
| |
Ultrasonography |
|---|
Although the idea of specialists in emergency medicine performing ultrasound examinations is not new, reports of the clinical impact of this are. The clinical applications of ultrasonography in the emergency department are well established. Ultrasound scanning is the best method of screening for ectopic pregnancy (fig 2) and has largely replaced diagnostic peritoneal lavage in detecting free intraperitoneal fluid. It is also reliable in detecting suspected gall stones, hydronephrosis, and abdominal aortic aneurysm. Performing ultrasonography in the emergency department can increase the efficiency and safety of patient management by reducing the time taken to detect potentially life threatening diseases, by expediting the evaluation of patients whose diagnosis is uncertain, and by providing visual guidance during the performance of many procedures. Research to date has focused on the clinical expertise of specialists in emergency medicine in performing limited or focused examinations, the clinical applications of ultrasonography in the emergency department, and new uses of ultrasonography in emergency practice.
|
Skill is important
Recent studies have shown that specialists in emergency medicine
can perform focused studies with excellent sensitivity when compared
with radiologists' examinations or other imaging techniques such as
computed tomography undertaken by radiologists. Specialists in
emergency medicine have shown skill in screening for ectopic pregnancy,24-26 free intraperitoneal fluid in patients
with blunt trauma,27-30 and haemothorax.31
Ultrasonography, performed as part of an overall protocol to evaluate
patients in the emergency department with complications during early
pregnancy, improved early diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy and reduced
the length of stay in emergency departments that did not have a 24 hour
ultrasonography service.
25 26
Ultrasonography depends on
the skill of the operator, however, and experience and training of many
emergency department doctors varies widely. Because of this, the
findings of many of reports are generalisable only to doctors with
similar experience. Training and experience clearly influence the
sensitivity and accuracy of results.29
Clinical applications
The full extent of clinical applications of ultrasonography in the
emergency department remains to be defined. Preliminary reports have
described further uses, including detection of deep venous
thrombosis,32 screening for complications of
nephrolithiasis (specifically hydronephrosis),33 and
ultrasound guidance during invasive procedures.34 New and
potentially useful applications include identification of complications
in survivors of non-traumatic cardiac arrest and identification of
treatable causes of pulseless electrical
activity.35
|
Further study
Nearly all published reports to date are limited by small numbers,
wide variability in the training and expertise of the doctors performing the studies, and lack of any data showing clearly the clinical impact of ultrasound examination in the emergency department. Issues begging for clarification include the following: the amount of
training necessary to perform limited studies with reasonable accuracy,
identification of those clinical applications of ultrasound scanning
that have the greatest impact on clinical care in the emergency
department, and standardised guidelines for research into
ultrasonography in emergency medicine.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
I thank Joseph A Maffei for his help in obtaining the technitium-99m labelled sestamibi images and Dr Verena T Valley for the ultrasound images.
Funding: No additional funding.
Conflict of interest: None.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(Accepted 10 September 1997)