Colloids no better than crystalloids for fluid replacement in hypovolaemic patients

For decades controversy has existed over the relative benefits of colloid and crystalloid solutions for fluid resuscitation of hypovolaemic patients. In their systematic review of randomised controlled trials Schierhout and Roberts (p 961) found that, compared with crystalloids, use of colloids was associated with an increase in absolute risk of mortality of 4%. There was no evidence for differences of effect among different types of injury necessitating fluid resuscitation. The authors conclude that there is no evidence to support the continued use of the more expensive colloids for acute volume replacement in critically ill patients.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Fluid resuscitation with colloid or crystalloid solutions in critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomised trials
Gill Schierhout and Ian Roberts
BMJ 1998 316: 961-964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ