BMJ 1998;316:272-273 (24 January)

Papers

Does uptake of antenatal HIV testing depend on the individual midwife? Cross sectional study

Simon Jones, senior house officer,a Tonya Sadler, senior house officer,a Nicola Low, lecturer in genitourinary medicine,b Maggie Blott, consultant in obstetrics and gynaecology,c Jan Welch, consultant in genitourinary medicine a

a Department of Sexual Health, King's Healthcare, London SE5 9RS, b Academic Unit, Department of Genitourinary Medicine, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, London SE5 9RS, c Department of Women's Health, King's Healthcare, London SE5 9RS

Correspondence to: Dr Welch


right arrow   Introduction
up arrowTop
dotIntroduction
down arrowSubjects and methods
down arrowResults
down arrowComment
down arrowReferences

The risk of vertical transmission of HIV infection can be reduced by at least two thirds with perinatal interventions, including antiretroviral treatment and abstention from breastfeeding.1 The Department of Health recommends offering HIV testing to all pregnant women in areas of high seroprevalence,2 but uptake and detection rates remain low, with wide variation between centres.3 In 1994-5 only 16% (65/401) of pregnant women infected with HIV in London and south east England were recognised before the birth.4 As uptake varies with factors such as the ethnic group of the midwife,5 we examined the effect of the midwives' characteristics and site and duration of pretest discussion on uptake of testing in an area of high seroprevalence.4


right arrow   Subjects and methods
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
dotSubjects and methods
down arrowResults
down arrowComment
down arrowReferences

An antenatal HIV testing programme was introduced in June 1995. All women at their booking visit were offered an HIV test by midwives trained about HIV infection and how to discuss testing. Each midwife was allocated a number (by a senior midwife not involved in the study) and gave details of age, year of qualification, self defined ethnic group, and site of work. For each pregnant woman the midwife's number, duration of pretest discussion, decision about testing, and whether the result was to be posted or collected were recorded. Only negative results were sent by post. Uptake was calculated as the percentage of women booked who accepted an HIV test. Logistic regression models for grouped data (STATA version 4.0, Austin, TX, USA) were used to estimate odds ratios.


right arrow   Results
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and methods
dotResults
down arrowComment
down arrowReferences

During the first year of the programme 3420 women were booked for antenatal care. Data from 61 forms with no midwife code were excluded, leaving 3359 women of whom 794 (24%) had an HIV test. Of women accepting a test, 739 (93%) elected to receive the result by post. Midwives booked a median of 22 women (range 1-545). Uptake of individual midwives booking more than ten women ranged from zero to 100% (median 25%).

HIV testing was twice as likely if pretest discussions lasted longer than 5 minutes (odds ratio 2.19, 95% confidence intervals 1.82 to 2.62). The table shows the effect of midwives' characteristics on uptake. After all measured characteristics were controlled for, age, experience, and ethnic group remained associated with acceptance of testing. Uptake with midwives aged over 40 and those qualified more than ten years ago was similar to uptake with the youngest and most recently qualified, but testing was significantly less likely when offered by midwives of intermediate age and experience. Tests offered by midwives describing themselves as white were about half as likely to be accepted as those offered by midwives from other ethnic groups. Overall, white women were least likely and black African women most likely to accept HIV testing, but there were no consistent trends when uptake by different ethnic groups was examined according to the ethnicity of the midwife (data not shown).


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Uptake of antenatal HIV testing according to booking site and personal characteristics of midwives


right arrow   Comment
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and methods
up arrowResults
dotComment
down arrowReferences

The extremely wide variation in HIV testing rates between midwives suggests that acceptance depends greatly on how the test is offered. Uptake was higher for pretest discussions lasting longer than 5 minutes and for midwives qualified under 5 or over 10 years ago. The most experienced midwives may be more confident in their counselling abilities, or the women may be too daunted to decline any tests they offer. Recently qualified midwives may have received more up to date training about HIV infection. As reported previously, midwives from black ethnic groups had higher uptake rates.5

Overall uptake was low compared with countries such as France and Sweden, where most pregnant women are tested for HIV. Qualitative studies could usefully explore differences in attitudes and approaches of midwives towards antenatal HIV testing. Effective support and training for midwives will address anxieties about offering antenatal testing and update midwives about recent advances to ensure that women are not discouraged from accepting an HIV test.


right arrow   Acknowledgements

Funding: None

Conflict of interest: None


right arrow   Notes

Contributors: SJ was involved in setting up the study, including designing the data collection forms and initial data collection; TS carried out subsequent data collection and analysis; NL carried out the statistical analysis; MB and JW were primarily involved in setting up the antenatal HIV screening programme and setting up the study to monitor its progress. All authors were involved in writing the final paper.

Guarantors: MB, JW.


right arrow   References
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects and methods
up arrowResults
up arrowComment
dotReferences

  1. Peckham C, Gibb D. Mother-to-child transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus. N Engl J Med 1995;333:298-302. [Free Full Text]
  2. Department of Health. Guidelines for offering voluntary named HIV antibody testing to women receiving antenatal care. London, Department of Health, 1994.
  3. Gibb D, MacDonagh S, Gupta R, Tookey P, Peckham C, Ades A. Factors affecting uptake of antenatal HIV testing in London: results of a multicentre study. BMJ 1998:316:259-61.
  4. Unlinked Anonymous Surveys Steering Group, Unlinked Anonymous Prevalence Monitoring Programme England and Wales. Report. London, Department of Health, 1996.
  5. Meadows J, Jenkinson S, Cataln J, Gazzard B. Voluntary HIV testing in the antenatal clinic: differing uptake rates for individual counselling midwives. AIDS Care 1990;2:229-33. [Medline]
(Accepted 7 November 1997)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Reducing the vertical transmission of HIV
Babatunde A Gbolade, K H Tan, K P Teo, Ben Essex, Mary A Waldron, Elizabeth Foley, V Harindra, Meg Goodman, Adeola Olaitan, Sara Madge, Melvyn Jones, Margaret Johnson, Fabio Parazzini, Elena Ricci, Paola Grasso, Matteo Surace, Guido Benzi, and Paquita de Zulueta
BMJ 1998 316: 1899. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Stokes, S. H M, McMaster, P., Ismail, K. M K (2007). Acceptability of perinatal rapid point-of-care HIV testing in an area of low HIV prevalence in the UK. Arch. Dis. Child. 92: 505-508 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Burns, F, Mercer, C H, Mercey, D, Sadiq, S T, Curran, B, Kell, P (2004). Barriers to HIV testing: a survey of GUM clinic attendees. Sex. Transm. Infect. 80: 247-248 [Full text]  
  • Rogstad, K E, Bramham, L, Lowbury, R, Kinghorn, G R (2003). Use of a leaflet to replace verbal pretest discussion for HIV: effects and acceptability. Sex. Transm. Infect. 79: 243-245 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • O'Mara, L. (2003). Evidence based patient information leaflets in maternity care had limited visibility and did not promote informed choice of childbearing women. Evid. Based Nurs. 6: 27-27 [Full text]  
  • Stapleton, H., Kirkham, M., Thomas, G. (2002). Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care. BMJ 324: 639-639 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Griffiths, M, Stockdale, H, Winter, A J, Huengsberg, M (2001). Uptake of HIV testing in a genitourinary medicine clinic is affected by individual doctors. Sex. Transm. Infect. 77: 143-144 [Full text]  
  • Nicoll, A., Gill, O N., Peckham, C. S, Ades, A., Parry, J., Mortimer, P., Goldberg, D., Noone, A., Bennett, D., Catchpole, M. (2000). The public health applications of unlinked anonymous seroprevalence monitoring for HIV in the United Kingdom. Int J Epidemiol 29: 1-10 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Nicoll, A., Peckham, C. (1999). Reducing vertical transmission of HIV in the UK. BMJ 319: 1211-1212 [Full text]  
  • Foley, E., Harindra, V, Blott, M., Yearwood, J., Gerval, M., Welch, J., Zuckerman, M. (1999). Routine antenatal HIV testing. BMJ 319: 1069-1069 [Full text]  
  • Dover, S. (1998). Offering HIV testing to pregnant women increased test uptake but not anxiety. Evid. Based Nurs. 1: 111-111 [Full text]  
  • Gbolade, B. A, Tan, K H, Teo, K P, Essex, B., Waldron, M. A, Foley, E., Harindra, V, Goodman, M., Olaitan, A., Madge, S., Jones, M., Johnson, M., Parazzini, F., Ricci, E., Grasso, P., Surace, M., Benzi, G., de Zulueta, P. (1998). Reducing the vertical transmission of HIV. BMJ 316: 1899-1899 [Full text]  
  • Mercey, D. (1998). Antenatal HIV testing. BMJ 316: 241-242 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ