BMJ 1997;315:1504-1505 (6 December)

Papers

Underreporting of mortality from RhD haemolytic disease in Scotland and its implications: retrospective review

Charles R Whitfield, emeritus regius professor of midwifery,a Alaeddin Raafat, honorary lecturer in transfusion medicine,b Stanislaw J Urbaniak, honorary reader in transfusion medicine b

a Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, the Queen Mother's Maternity Hospital, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G3 8SH, b Academic Transfusion Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Aberdeen, Regional Transfusion Centre, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB9 2ZW

Correspondence to: Professor Whitfield


right arrow   Introduction
up arrowTop
dotIntroduction
down arrowSubjects, methods, and results
down arrowComment
down arrowReferences

Clarke et al surveyed the decline in RhD haemolytic disease in England and Wales from 1977-92 by reviewing the statistics of the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys; during that time deaths attributable to RhD haemolytic disease had fallen from 18.4 to 1.3 per 100 000 live births.1 We surveyed RhD alloimmunisation in mothers resident in Scotland between 1987 and 91 and confirmed that fetal loss from RhD haemolytic disease was greater than that listed by the General Register Office in Scotland. Underreporting has serious implications for recognising, understanding, and preventing this potentially lethal disease.


right arrow   Subjects, methods, and results
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
dotSubjects, methods, and results
down arrowComment
down arrowReferences

Data on deaths attributable to RhD haemolytic disease during 1987-91 were obtained from: death certificates; details of pregnancies in Scottish residents who had antibody to RhD antigen and were managed at the Queen Mother's Hospital; and a retrospective study identifying women in whom RhD antibodies were detected for the first time during 1987-91 (1). The definition of mortality from RhD haemolytic disease included all abortions after fetal death, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths attributed to RhD incompatibility or its treatment and deaths after 28 days of life in which RhD haemolytic disease or its treatment was the primary cause.2


 
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Details of deaths from RhD haemolytic disease during 1987-91 and mother's alloimmunisation

Only four deaths were listed by the General Register Office in Scotland; all were neonatal deaths occurring in women immunised against RhD before 1987. Four deaths occurred in the cohort but none were listed through the General Register Office in Scotland. Twelve other pregnancies managed at the Queen Mother's Hospital during this time (mothers alloimmunised before 1987) resulted in deaths related to RhD haemolytic disease. Ten of the pregnancies ended with abortions after fetal death, and two resulted in liveborn infants treated in utero by repeated blood transfusions. These two infants were delivered electively more than two months preterm but died from complications on the first and 95th days of life.

Thirteen of the 20 deaths resulted from alloimmunisation against RhD antigen during a first pregnancy. In four cases maternal RhD antibodies were first detected within two days of delivery, and in the remaining nine during gestation. There was also good documentation of antepartum immunisation in relation to at least two of the deaths from second pregnancies.


right arrow   Comment
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects, methods, and results
dotComment
down arrowReferences

A review of the case notes of deaths recorded as Rh haemolytic disease in England and Wales showed that disease was often caused by antibodies other than RhD antibody or was wrongly coded. Our data show that five times as many deaths from RhD haemolytic disease were uncertified as were certified through the General Register Office in Scotland. The major cause of underreporting deaths was that certification data exclude abortions. Extrapolation of all the deaths from RhD haemolytic disease identified in Scotland to the population of the United Kingdom would suggest about 50 deaths per year (six per 100 000 live births).

Antepartum prophylaxis against RhD antigen is used widely outside the United Kingdom, and in North America alloimmunisation has been reduced to less than 0.3% of women at risk.3 The standard British dose of 500 international units of anti-D immunoglobulin administered at 28 and 34 weeks' gestation reduced alloimmunisation from 0.95% in historical controls to 0.32%,4 and we have recently shown that this approach could generate net savings to the NHS in Scotland by avoiding the costs of intervention in alloimmunised women and their babies.5

Our data support the introduction of routine antepartum prophylaxis as 65% (13/20) of deaths from RhD haemolytic disease were the eventual results of antepartum sensitisation in the mothers' first pregnancies and 65% of women seen at the Queen Mother's Hospital were alloimmunised during and not after a pregnancy.2


right arrow   Acknowledgements

Funding: This study was financed in part by the Scottish Office Department of Health, project grant K/OPR/2/2D155.

Conflict of interest: None.


right arrow   References
up arrowTop
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowSubjects, methods, and results
up arrowComment
dotReferences

  1. Clarke C, Hussey RM. Decline in deaths from Rhesus haemolytic disease of the newborn. J Roy Coll Phys 1994;28:310-1.
  2. Murphy KW, Whitfield CR. Rhesus disease in this decade. Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol 1994;6:61-7.
  3. Bowman JM. The prevention of Rh immunization. Transfusion Med Rev 1988;2:129-50. [Medline]
  4. Thornton JG, Page C, Foote G, Arthur GR, Tovey LAD, Scott JS. Efficacy and long term effects of antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin. BMJ 1989;298:1671-3.
  5. Vick S, Cairns J, Urbaniak SJ, Whitfield CR, Raafat A. Cost effectiveness of antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. Health Econ 1996;5:319-28.
(Accepted 11 March 1997)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Preventing RhD haemolytic disease of the newborn
Douglas Lee, J S Craig, B G McClure, and T R J Tubman
BMJ 1998 316: 1611. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Greenough, A, Hartnoll, G, Hambley, H, Richards, J (2002). Treatment requirements of infants with rhesus isoimmunisation within a geographically defined area. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 87: F202-203 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • van Dijk, B. (1997). Preventing RhD haemolytic disease of the newborn. BMJ 315: 1480-1481 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ