Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
a Department of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, Otago Medical School, PO Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand, b Injury Prevention Research Centre, University of Auckland School of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand, c Department of General Practice, Dunedin School of Medicine, Otago Medical School, d VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108, USA
Correspondence to: Professor Campbell
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective:To assess the effectiveness of a home
exercise programme of strength and balance retraining exercises in reducing falls and injuries in
elderly women.
Design:Randomised controlled trial of an
individually
tailored programme of physical therapy in the home (exercise group, n=116) compared
with
the usual care and an equal number of social visits (control group, n=117).
Setting:17 general practices in Dunedin, New
Zealand.
Subjects:Women aged 80 years and older living in
the
community and registered with a general practice in Dunedin.
Main outcome measures:Number of falls and
injuries
related to falls and time between falls during one year of follow up; changes in muscle strength
and
balance measures after six months.
Results:After one year there were 152 falls in the
control group and 88 falls in the exercise group. The mean (SD) rate of falls was lower in the
exercise than the control group (0.87 (1.29) v 1.34 (1.93)
falls per year respectively; difference 0.47; 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.90). The
relative hazard for the first four falls in the exercise group compared with the control group was
0.68
(0.52 to 0.90). The relative hazard for a first fall with injury in the exercise group compared with
the control group was 0.61 (0.39 to 0.97). After six months, balance had improved in the exercise
group (difference between groups in change in balance score 0.43 (0.21 to 0.65).
Conclusions:An individual programme of strength
and
balance retraining exercises improved physical function and was effective in reducing falls and
injuries in women 80 years and older.
|
Key messages
|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prospective community studies have detailed risk factors for falls in elderly people and identified those old people who are likely to fall; they also provide the basis for preventive studies.1 2 3 The risk factors most commonly identified, which are possibly those most amenable to interventions that can be carried out in primary care, are loss of muscle strength and flexibility, and impaired balance and reaction time.4 However, some studies have shown that increased activity in very old people can mean more falls and injuries.5 6
Meta-analysis of seven studies in the "frailty and injuries: cooperative studies of intervention techniques" trials showed that strength and balance training reduced the frequency of falls.7 Three of the study sites showed an increased, but not statistically significant, risk of falling with the training programme. These studies used a variety of additional intervention strategies, and not all could be applied easily in a general practice setting.
A public health programme to reduce falls in elderly people needs to be simple, easy to implement, and affordable as well as effective. We developed a home based exercise and balance training programme which could be used in general practice. Age and female sex, the two most easily observable risk factors, were used to identify the study population.4 We report the effect of a randomised, single blind controlled trial of a home based strength and balance retraining programme on the frequency of falls, injury from falls, balance, and muscle strength in women aged 80 years and older.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study participants
Women aged 80 years and older living in the community were identified from the
computerised registers of 17 general practices. They were invited by their general practitioner
to
take part in the study if they were able to move around within their own home and were not
receiving physiotherapy.
Study design
Potential study subjects were visited at home by the research nurse. She obtained
informed
consent, filled in the mental status questionnaire in order to exclude those women unable to
comply
with the study requirements (score of <7 from 10), completed baseline questionnaires, and
took
a note of current medication.8 Subjects subsequently visited
a clinic for a baseline assessment and were then randomised to the control group or to receive the
exercise programme. Six months later the physical assessments were repeated at the clinic by the
same physiotherapist. The same research nurse completed the questionnaires at the
subject's
home after one year. Falls, injuries from falls, and compliance with the exercise programme were
monitored for one year.
Monitoring falls and injuries
Falls were the main outcome measure and were defined as "unintentionally coming
to rest on the ground, floor, or other lower level." Coming to rest against furniture or a
wall
was not counted as a fall.9 Each subject was given a
calendar
comprising 12 addressed, reply paid postcards on which she could record falls daily for each
month.
Postcards were mailed back at the end of each month throughout the year, and the participant was
contacted by telephone if the postcard was not returned. When a subject reported a fall, she was
telephoned by the research team and the date and circumstances of the fall and details of any
injuries
were recorded on a fall event form. Injuries were defined as "serious" if the fall
resulted in a fracture or admission to hospital or if any wounds needed stitches and
"moderate" if there was bruising, sprains, cuts, abrasions, or a reduction in
physical
function for at least three days, or if the woman sought medical help. The circumstances of
"serious" injuries were confirmed from hospital records. An investigator (AJC)
who
did not know to which group individual women belonged reviewed all fall events to determine
if
they met the fall definition and to classify the injury. Falls and injuries were monitored until the
date
of death or withdrawal from the study.
Health measures
At entry to the study, a medical history was taken; demographic information and details
of
social support, current medication, and health related behaviours were recorded; and weight,
height,
visual acuity, blood pressure while sitting and standing, and heart rate were measured. The
instrumental activities of daily living scale, physical self maintenance scale, fear of falling, and
the
physical activity scale for the elderly questionnaires were completed at entry to the study and
after
one year.10 11
12
Physical assessment
Physical assessment measures were chosen to evaluate balance, gait, strength, and
endurance.
The same tests were repeated at entry to the study and after six months. The assessments are
shown
in the box.
|
Assessment tests to estimate balance, gait, strength, and endurance
|
Programme
The physiotherapist visited each subject who had been randomised to the exercise group
four
times over her first two months in the study. She prescribed a selection of exercises from the
programme at appropriate and increasing levels of difficulty, and a walking plan. Each home visit
took approximately one hour. Exercises included moderate intensity strengthening exercises with
ankle cuff weights (0.5 kg and 1 kg) for the following muscle groups: hip extensor and abductor
muscles, knee flexor and extensor muscles, inner range quadriceps, and ankle plantar and
dorsiflexor
muscles. Other exercises were standing with one foot directly in front of the other; walking
placing
one foot directly in front of the other; walking on the toes and walking on the heels; walking
backwards, sideways, and turning around; stepping over an object; bending and picking up an
object; stair climbing in the home; rising from a sitting position to a standing one; knee squat;
and
"active range of movement" exercises (for example, neck rotations and hip and
knee
extensions).
The exercises took about 30 minutes to complete. The women following the exercise programme were told to complete it at least three times a week and were encouraged to walk outside the home at least three times a week. Safety was ensured by prescribing each exercise appropriately, by giving the women adequate instructions on each exercise, and by providing an instruction booklet with illustrations. After the fourth visit, participants were encouraged to continue the exercise programme on their own and to telephone the physiotherapist with any problems. Subjects were telephoned regularly to maintain motivation.
Participants recorded whether they had completed the prescribed exercises or walked each day on a postcard calendar similar to the one used to record falls; they posted this back at the end of each month. The research nurse made a social visit to those in the control group four times during the first two months and telephoned them regularly during the year of follow up.
Statistical analysis
The sample size calculation was based on the proportion of elderly women who had fallen
once or more during a 12 month prospective study in the community.2 Numbers of women in the groups were based on the expectation
that
the exercise programme would reduce the proportion of women who fell during the year by
20% and allowed for a significance level of 0.05, a power of 0.80, and a drop out rate of
20%. Data were analysed on an intention to treat basis using SPSS version 6.1.1. Baseline
characteristics and changes from baseline to six months and baseline to one year were compared
in
the two groups using the
2 test, Student's t test, or the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. The event
rate
was calculated as the mean of the number of falls divided by the time over which falls were
monitored for each participant, and the 95% confidence interval of the difference was
calculated assuming a negative binomial distribution.16
Proportional hazards models were used to determine relative hazards for the two groups for a first
fall and a first fall with injury. A relative hazard was calculated to compare the two groups using
the Andersen-Gill extension of the Cox model, which allows for multiple events per
subject
(SAS version 6.1).7 We used the first four falls for each
participant in this analysis rather than all falls (maximum 10) to avoid overweighting by subjects
who fell more than four times.
Ethical approval
All subjects gave informed consent. Approval for the study was given by the Southern
Regional Health Authority's ethics committee (Otago).
Group assignment and blinding
The group allocation schedule was developed by a statistician using computer generated
random numbers and the list was held off site by an independent person. Group assignment was
made by telephone contact after all baseline questionnaires and assessments were completed. The
assessment physiotherapist and investigator classifying fall events remained blind to group
allocation.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The progress of the participants through the trial is shown in figure 1.
|
Analysis
Characteristics of women at entry to the study are given in table 1. Two measures differed between the groups, but these were not
related to the risk of falling and did not influence the findings of the study.
|
After six months balance had improved in the exercise group compared with the control group (mean (SD) changes in the 4-test balance score were 0.42 (0.86) and -0.01 (0.80) respectively; difference 0.43; 95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.65). A higher proportion of those in the exercise group had improved their performance in the chair stand test (relative risk 1.41; 1.07 to 1.87). There were no differences between the two groups for the remaining physical assessment measures.
After one year of follow up there had been 152 falls in the control group and 88 falls in the exercise group. The total follow up time was 113.4 person years for the control group and 108.8 person years for the exercise group. The mean (SD) rate of falls per year was lower in the group receiving the exercise programme than in the control group (0.87 (1.29) and 1.34 (1.93) falls per year respectively; difference 0.47; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.90). The number of falls for study participants is shown in table 2.
|
The hazard ratio for a first fall in the exercise group compared with the control group was 0.81 (0.56 to 1.16). With the Andersen-Gill extension of the Cox model, the hazard ratio for the exercise group compared with the control group for the first four falls was 0.68 (0.52 to 0.90).
Elderly people who had four or more falls during follow up had a higher risk of having fallen in the previous year than the remainder of the participants (13 of 17 v 81 of 195: relative risk 1.84; 1.35 to 2.51), but values at baseline did not differ for any other variables.
Eighty five falls resulted in moderate injury and 25 in severe injury. The hazard ratio for a first fall with injury was 0.61 (0.39 to 0.97). The proportion of subjects monitored for the full 12 months (n=213) who were injured from a fall was lower in the exercise group than in the control group (26.2% (27 of 103) v 39.1% (43 of 110); relative risk 0.67; 95% CI 0.45 to 1.00).
After one year 42% (48 of 114) of the survivors in the exercise group were still completing the programme three or more times a week. The control group became less active (mean (SD) change in the physical activity scale for the elderly score -11.0 (22.3) v -4.6 (22.9); difference 6.4; 0.2 to 12.6), and their fear of falling increased (mean (SD) change in falls self efficacy score -6.1 (12.2) v -2.5 (11.1); difference 3.6; 0.4 to 6.8). There were no differences between the group scores for the instrumental activities of daily living scale (median 8.0; range 0 to 8) or the physical self maintenance scale (6.0; 3 to 6) at baseline or after one year (7.0; 0 to 8 and 5.0; 2 to 6, respectively).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have shown that a programme of strength and balance training exercises, which could be done at home and organised by general practices, reduced significantly the number of falls and injuries experienced by women aged 80 years and older. The reduction in the rate of falls was greater than that found in the combined frailty and injuries cooperative studies of intervention techniques studies, but similar to that achieved by combined interventions.3 7
Improvement in balance and strength
The exercise group showed improved balance and an improved performance in the chair
stand test. Improvement in balance has been shown in previous studies, but has usually come
about
through group activities or by means of specific training equipment.17 18 19 Community programmes have also shown improvements in
balance
and reaction time in elderly people, but no reduction in the frequency of falls.20 The combined interventions of Tinetti and colleagues led to a
significant improvement in balance and in transferring safely from one position to
another.21
Prevention of falls
The balance retraining programme strengthened postural control mechanisms, but initially
it put the elderly woman at risk of falling. Our strength retraining programme required an
increase
in activities such as daily walks and therefore increased the opportunities for falling. The time
to first
fall was used to assess this possible increase in the risk of early falls and was similar for the two
groups.
Those who have one fall are more likely to have another.1 2 This differing tendency for recurrence was allowed for in the rigorous analysis used.16 One of the main differences between the two groups was in the prevention of several falls. At the Atlanta site of the "frailty and injuries: cooperative studies of intervention techniques," Tai Chi had most benefit in preventing several falls.17 Although it could be argued that the programme should be directed at people who fall often, most older women are sufficiently susceptible to the risk of falling and sufficiently inactive to benefit from planned activity.22 It is difficult to predict those who may start to fall frequently. In our study a history of previous falls was the only factor which could have been used to predict which subjects were likely to have frequent falls.
Use of programme in general practice
The programme was designed to be used as part of a preventive plan based in general
practice, but issues remain which need to be considered in the transition from a research project
to
a public health programme. The enthusiasm and commitment of the research physiotherapist may
encourage greater compliance in the elderly people than is possible in the busy routine of a
working
practice. On the other hand, recruitment may improve when the programme is sponsored by the
general practice. Our involvement was kept to a minimum but more regular encouragement
during
normal practice attendances may improve participation.
Although only 37% (233 of 622) of those aged 80 years and older on general practice lists participated in the programme, we did not have an elite, fit sample. Some of the women were very frailthe mean score on the physical activity scale for the elderly was only 51.5 within a possible range of 0 to 400. The high frequency of other risk factors for falls and the high fall rate overall in the study, similar to that observed in previous prospective studies,1 2 also indicated that this was not an unusually sprightly group. Although there was some improvement in physical activity in the exercise group, the improvement was small and the nurse who completed the 12 month questionnaire was aware of group allocation. The improvements must therefore be interpreted with caution.
Results from a study such as this depend on the completeness of the reports of falls. Tear-off calendars have been used successfully before, and 88% of falls were notified in this way. If a calendar postcard was not returned, or if a fall was noted, the participant was contacted by telephone and details of the fall recorded on a structured event form.
Falls remain a major public health problem and affect the lives of many older people. Not only may an individual programme of physical activity reduce the risk of falls, it may improve health in other ways.23 24 Younger people who have several falls may also benefit from the programme. Our study has shown that preventing falls through a home based programme in which strength and balance training is a key component can reduce the frequency of falls. The next step is to make the transition from trials of efficacy to trials of more general implementation and health promotion.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
We thank the study participants; their general practitioners; the study research nurses Lenore Armstrong, Shirley Jones, and Rebecca Neill; assessment physiotherapist Edith Laba; statistician Sheila Williams; economist Paul Scuffham; and Jocelyn Thornicroft, adviser from the Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation.
Funding: Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation of New Zealand. DMB was sponsored by the Department of Veterans Affairs, United States.
Conflict of interest: None.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
75 with severe visual impairment: the VIP trial
Read all Rapid Responses