BMJ 1996;313:1624-1626 (21 December)

ASPECTS OF DRUGS

Effect of colour of drugs: systematic review of perceived effect of drugs and of their effectiveness

Anton J M de Craen, clinical epidemiologist,a Pieter J Roos, hospital pharmacist,a A Leonard de Vries, research fellow, department of epidemiology,a Jos Kleijnen, clinical epidemiologist a

a Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and of Hospital Pharmacy, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands

Correspondence to: Mr de Craen.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the impact of the colour of a drug's formulation on its perceived effect and its effectiveness and to examine whether antidepressant drugs available in the Netherlands are different in colour from hypnotic, sedative, and anxiolytic drugs.
Design: Systematic review of 12 published studies. Six studies examined the perceived action of different coloured drugs and six the influence of the colour of a drug on its effectiveness. The colours of samples of 49 drugs affecting the central nervous system were assessed using a colour atlas.
Main outcome measures: Perceived stimulant action versus perceived depressant action of colour of drugs; the trials that assessed the effect of drugs in different colours were done in patients with different diseases and had different outcome measures.
Results: The studies on perceived action of coloured drugs showed that red, yellow, and orange are associated with a stimulant effect, while blue and green are related to a tranquillising effect. The trials that assessed the impact of the colour of drugs on their effectiveness showed inconsistent differences between colours. The quality of the methods of these trials was variable. Hypnotic, sedative, and anxiolytic drugs were more likely than antidepressants to be green, blue, or purple.
Conclusion: Colours affect the perceived action of a drug and seem to influence the effectiveness of a drug. Moreover, a relation exists between the colouring of drugs that affect the central nervous system and the indications for which they are used. Research contributing to a better understanding of the effect of the colour of drugs is warranted.

Key messages

  • The colour of a drug seems to influence its effectiveness, but consistent trends are not apparent

  • Hypnotic, sedative, and anxiolytic drugs avail- able in the Netherlands are more likely than antidepressants to be green, blue, or purple

  • Research contributing to a better understanding of the effect of the colour of drugs is warranted

Introduction

The response to drug treatment is not simply a reflection of its chemical compounds. Extraneous factors may considerably influence the size of a treatment effect.1 Factors such as the reputation of the doctor, the patient's attitude towards the expected benefit, treatment mode, and credibility of the treatment might influence patients' expectancies and therefore the therapeutic outcome.

Most colours have universal meanings in a wide variety of cultures, red generally being considered strong and active, and blue and green to be associated with good.2 The colour of drug formulations might cause different expectations in patients, and could therefore produce different therapeutic effects. In this study we sought the answers to three questions: Are formulations of different colours perceived as equally active? Do different coloured formulations of the same drug produce a different effect in randomised clinical trials? Is the colour of available hypnotics, sedatives, and anxiolytics systematically different from that of antidepressants in the Netherlands? We systematically reviewed published work to answer the first two questions, and we assessed the colours of drug samples to answer the last.

Materials and methods

Search for publications--Relevant publications were located by computer searches of Medline (1966-95) with medical subject heading colour and pill, tablet, medication, capsule, or drug in the title or abstract. Embase (1974-95) and ClinPSYC (1980-94) were searched with similar strategies. Other publications were found by reviewing reference lists, through correspondence with authors of books and articles on related subjects, and through correspondence with pharmaceutical companies. The Science Citation Index was used for prospectively identifying studies that cited previous ones.

Assessment of colours--To assess the colour of oral drugs that affect the central nervous system and are available in the Netherlands we approached all Dutch manufacturers of hypnotic, sedative, anxiolytic, or antidepressant drugs. They were asked for the most frequently prescribed dose of their product and to send us one example of this. In case a company did not respond, prescription details were derived from Intercontinental Medical Statistics,3 and colour was assessed in the hospital pharmacy. Colour of products was assessed using the Reichs Ausschuss fur Liefer-bedingungen design colour atlas.4 Drugs affecting the central nervous system were classed as sedative drugs (hypnotics, sedatives, and anxiolytics) or antidepressants, and the distribution of colours over the two groups was assessed.

Results PERCEIVED ACTION OF COLOURED DRUG FORMULATIONS

We found six publications that studied the perceived action of coloured drugs.5 6 7 8 9 10 Four studies assessed the expected effect of different colours in terms of stimulant or antidepressant and depressant or tranquillising.5 6 7 8 Red, yellow, and orange were related to a stimulant effect, while blue and green were associated with a tranquillising effect (table 1). One study found that the colour of the drug affected the perceived site of action, white being most common for general drugs, red and scarlet for cardiovascular and blood or lymphatic systems, and tan, beige, and burnt orange for skin.9 Another investigation studied the perceived strength of coloured capsules. Red and black were perceived as strong and white as weak.


Table 1--Summary of studies investigating perceived potencies* of different coloured drugs
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First author     Blue         Green       Orange       Red        Yellow        White
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Buckalew[5]    Depressant    Analgesic   Stimulant      --       Stimulant    Analgesic
Buckalew[6]        --       Depressant   Stimulant      --          --        Stimulant
Jacobs[7]      Depressant       --          --       Stimulant   Stimulant       --
Sebellico[8]   Depressant   Depressant   Stimulant   Stimulant   Stimulant   Depressant
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Depressant also includes hypnotic and tranquillising; stimulant includes antidepressant.

EFFECTS OF COLOURED DRUG FORMULATIONS

Six trials investigated the influence of the colour of drug formulation on the specific effect.11 12 13 14 15 16 The methodological quality of these trials, assessed using a previously reported 10 point rating scale,1 was seven points for two trials11 12, six and a half points for one trial,13 and less than five points for three trials.14 15 16 The table with scores and the items of methodological quality are available from AJMdeC and on the BMJs worldwide web page (http://www.bmj.com/bmj/).

All trials had different designs and different outcome measurements, so a meta-analysis was not possible. Overall, the results indicated differences between colours, but a consistent trend could not be detected.

In a double blind crossover study Cattaneo et al gave orange and blue placebos to 120 inpatients awaiting minor surgery who thought that they were receiving tranquillisers.11 In an analysis excluding patients with no preference, they showed that 26 out of 42 men (62%) preferred orange whereas 33 out of 54 women (61%) preferred blue capsules. Furthermore, they reported that the efficacy data were consistent with the expressed preference.

In a crossover study, Schapira et al randomly allocated 48 patients with anxiety symptoms to oxazepam administered in three different colours.12 Every patient received one week's treatment with each colour. Although statistical significance was not reached, anxiety symptoms were most improved with green and depressive symptoms responded best to yellow.

In a single blind experiment showing the effect of placebo Blackwell et al asked 100 medical students to participate in an experiment in which they they would receive either a sedative or stimulant drug.13 All of the 56 students who volunteered in fact received either a blue or a pink placebo. Subjects taking the blue placebos felt less alert (66%) than those taking the pink (26%) and also more drowsy (72% v 37% respectively).

In a randomised crossover study reported by Luchelli et al 96 patients admitted for elective surgery were randomised to receive either a hypnotic agent or placebo on the first night.14 On the second night all patients received the other study drug, which was the same colour as that on the night before. Two colours were tested, blue and orange. Patients taking blue capsules reported falling asleep significantly more quickly than those taking the orange capsules (103 minutes v 135 minutes; P<0.05), and those taking the blue capsules slept longer (379 minutes v 346 minutes; P<0.01).

In a large double blind trial of an analgesic after dental surgery Nagao et al found that 79% of patients experienced adequate pain relief with red tablets, whereas 73% of patients reported adequate pain relief with white tablets.15

In a crossover trial reported by Huskisson 24 patients with rheumatoid arthritis received red, blue, green, or yellow drugs.16 Three analgesics were tested against placebo. The red placebo was as effective in relieving pain as any of the active drugs. Blue and green placebos were average pain relievers. Colour did not change the effectiveness of the active drugs.

COLOURS OF ORAL DRUGS AFFECTING THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM

We assessed the colour of 49 oral drugs affecting the central nervous system (table 2). Sedatives in comparison with antidepressants were more often green, blue, or purple (Fisher exact P value: 0.029 when white and multicoloured drugs were excluded from the analysis and 0.035 when they were included). However, colours were not consistent in the two categories. A list of all 49 drugs assessed is available from AJMdeC and on the BMJ's worldwide web page.


Table 2--Colours of sedative (hypnotics, sedatives, and anxiolytics) and antidepressant
drugs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category        Red, orange, yellow   Green, blue, purple   White  Multicoloured  Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sedative                 5                     9             16          1         31
Antidepressant           8                     1              7          2         18
Total                   13                    10             23          3         49

Discussion

Our review shows that little research has been done to study the effect of coloured drug formulations. Studies on the perceived effect of colour show that red, orange, and yellow tablets are best for stimulant drugs and that blue and green tablets are best for sedative drugs. The studies assessing the influence of colour on the effectiveness of a drug did not find a general trend favouring one or more colours. Our assessment of the colours used in oral drugs affecting the central nervous system indicates that sedatives are more often green, blue, or purple than are antidepressants.

There might be several explanations why different colours have different effects. Colour itself might have direct psychophysiological effects. Moreover, if the colour of the drug parallels the perceived action patients might better comply, resulting in a better outcome. The colour of a drug is not the only perceptual characteristic that could influence patients' response to the drug. Preparation form (capsule or tablet) and size are other factors that may affect a therapeutic outcome. Buckalew and Coffield found that capsules are perceived as stronger compared to tablets.5 Similarly, in a clinical trial comparing chlordiazepoxide capsules with tablets Hussain concluded that in the treatment of anxiety the overall response was better when patients were treated with capsules.17

Patients taking more than one drug might recognise different drugs better if they are in various colours. This probably reduces accidental poisonings. Accidental poisoning has been reported often, from as early as 1956.18 After this report in 1956 Jolly and Forrest suggested that drugs should be different from each other and should not resemble sweets to prevent accidental poisoning in children.19

We approached several pharmaceutical companies for relevant publications. Although they were greatly interested and helpful, they did not find many publications on the effects of coloured drugs. One article on perceived effects of coloured drugs was retrieved this way,8 and one company suggested that research had been done with their products. Pharmaceutical companies might be more interested in different colours for marketing purposes than for efficacy. However, the distribution of colours over the sedative and antidepressant medication of different companies showed a relation between colour and category that suggests that the colour of drugs might be determined by factors other than marketing alone.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, little research has been carried out investigating the effect of coloured drugs, but the available evidence suggests that green and blue may have more sedative effects and red and orange may have more stimulant effects. Research contributing to a better understanding of the effect of coloured medication is certainly warranted.

Funding: None. Conflict of interest: None.

  1. Kleijnen J, de Craen AJM, van Everdingen J, Krol L. Placebo effect in double-blind clinical trials: a review of interactions with medications. Lancet 1994;344:1347-9. [Medline]
  2. Adams FM, Osgood CE. A cross-cultural study of the affective meanings of color. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1973;4:135-56. [Abstract]
  3. Intercontinental Medical Statistics. Medical index. The Hague: IMS, 1994.
  4. Reichs Ausschuss fur Lieferbedingungen. Deutsches Institut fur Gutesicherung und Kennzeichnung eV. St Augustin, Germany: RAL, undated. (RAL Design System.)
  5. Buckalew LW, Coffield KE. An investigation of drug expectancy as a function of capsule color and size and preparation form. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1982;2:245-8. [Medline]
  6. Buckalew LW, Coffield KE. Drug expectations associated with perceptual characteristics: ethnic factors. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1982;55:915-8. [Medline]
  7. Jacobs KW, Nordan FM. Classification of placebo drugs: effect of color. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1979;49:367-72. [Medline]
  8. Sebellico A. Il colore de farmaco: inchiesta preliminare. Bollettino Societa Italiana Biologia Sperimentale 1989;65:685-7.
  9. Buckalew LW, Ross S. Medication property effects on expectations of action. Drug Development Research 1991;23:101-8.
  10. Sallis RE, Buckalew LW. Relation of capsule color and perceived potency. Perceptual Motor Skills 1984;58:897-8. [Medline]
  11. Cattaneo AD, Lucchelli PE, Filippuci G. Sedative effects of placebo treatment. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1970;3:43-5.
  12. Schapira K, McClelland HA, Griffiths MR, Newell DJ. Study on the effects of tablet colour in the treatment of anxiety states. BMJ 1970;ii:446-9.
  13. Blackwell B, Bloomfield SS, Buncher CR. Demonstration to medical students of placebo responses and non-drug factors. Lancet 1972;i:1279-82.
  14. Lucchelli PE, Cattaneo AD, Zattoni J. Effect of capsule colour and order of administration of hypnotic treatments. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1978;13:153-5. [Medline]
  15. Nagao Y, Komiya J, Kuroyanagi K, Minaba Y, Susa A. Effect of the color of analgesics on their therapeutic results. Shikwa Gakuho 1968;68:139-42.
  16. Huskisson E. Simple analgesics for arthritis. BMJ 1974;iv:196-200.
  17. Hussain MZ. Effect of shape of medication in treatment of anxiety states. Br J Psychiatry 1972;120:507-9. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Hurdle ADF, Lane BK. Phenobarbitone poisoning treated with bemegride. Lancet 1956;i:836-7.
  19. Jolly H, Forrest TRW. Accidental poisoning in childhood. An experimental approach to the prevention of poisoning by tablets. Lancet 1958;i:1308-9.

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Levitan, C. A., Zampini, M., Li, R., Spence, C. (2008). Assessing the Role of Color Cues and People's Beliefs About Color-Flavor Associations on the Discrimination of the Flavor of Sugar-Coated Chocolates. Chem Senses 0: bjn008v1-bjn008 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Frenkel, O. (2008). A Phenomenology of the 'Placebo Effect': Taking Meaning from the Mind to the Body. J Med Philos 33: 58-79 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Link, J., Haggard, R., Kelly, K., Forrer, D. (2006). Placebo/Nocebo symptom reporting in a sham herbal supplement trial.. Eval Health Prof 29: 394-406 [Abstract]  
  • Vallance, A. K. (2006). Something out of nothing: the placebo effect. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 12: 287-296 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Lichtenberg, P, Heresco-Levy, U, Nitzan, U (2004). The ethics of the placebo in clinical practice. J. Med. Ethics 30: 551-554 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Spuls, P. I., Witkamp, L., Bossuyt, P. M. M., Bos, J. D. (2004). The Course of Chronic Plaque-Type Psoriasis in Placebo Groups of Randomized Controlled Studies. Arch Dermatol 140: 338-344 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Moerman, D. E., Jonas, W. B. (2002). Deconstructing the Placebo Effect and Finding the Meaning Response. ANN INTERN MED 136: 471-476 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Barsky, A. J., Saintfort, R., Rogers, M. P., Borus, J. F. (2002). Nonspecific Medication Side Effects and the Nocebo Phenomenon. JAMA 287: 622-627 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Saper, J. R. (2001). What Matters Is Not the Differences Between Triptans, but the Differences Between Patients. Arch Neurol 58: 1481-1482 [Full text]  
  • Day, S. J, Altman, D. G (2000). Statistics Notes: Blinding in clinical trials and other studies. BMJ 321: 504-504 [Full text]  
  • Ernst, E, Herxheimer, A (1996). The power of placebo. BMJ 313: 1569-1570 [Full text]  

Online poll
Find out more

Rapid responses for this article

There are no rapid responses for this article.


Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview