Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
a Childhood Cancer Research Group, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6HJ, b School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
Correspondence to: Mr Stiller.
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the effects of migration, diversity of migrant origins, commuting, and socioeconomic status on the incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in childhood.
Design: Poisson regression analysis of incidence rates in relation to the variables of interest.
Setting: The 403 county districts of England and Wales during 1979-85.
Subjects: Children aged under 15 years.
Results: There were significant trends in the incidence of lymphoblastic leukaemia at ages 0-4 and 5-9 years with the proportion of children in a district who had recently entered the district. While there was no consistent relation between the proportion of recent incomers in the total population of a district and its incidence rate, the combination of higher migration with greater diversity of origins or distance moved was associated with higher incidence in both age groups. Incidence increased significantly at age 0-4 with the level of employment in a district and at age 5-9 with the proportion of households with access to a car. No significant trends were found with commuting.
Conclusions: The results for level of child migration and diversity of total migration provide evidence of an effect of population mixing on the incidence of childhood leukaemia which is not restricted to areas experiencing the most extreme levels of mixing.
|
Key messages
|
Introduction
In 1988 Kinlen suggested that childhood leukaemia might be a rare response to an as yet unidentified infection or infections.1 Outbreaks of infection would be most likely when carriers and susceptible persons are brought together by high levels of population mixing--for example, as a result of migration--and in these settings there would be a correspondingly high incidence of leukaemia among children whose immunity is limited. Support has been given to this hypothesis by a series of studies by Kinlen et al in which an increased incidence of childhood leukaemia was found in communities experiencing a high degree of population mixing, including rural new towns, towns with large increases in commuting, and areas receiving large numbers of servicemen, migrant construction workers, or wartime evacuees.2
Rapid population growth need not in itself give rise to an abnormal level of mixing. In their study of new towns throughout Britain, Kinlen et al differentiated between overspill new towns attracting migrants from a relatively limited set of areas and rural new towns where the origins of the incomers tended to be geographically more diverse.3 Only the rural new towns, where the introduction of a wider range of different types or strains of virus might be expected, had a raised incidence of leukaemia. That study did not include areas of rapid growth which were not designated new towns, however, nor did it differentiate quantitatively between areas of rapid population growth that attract most of their incomers from a limited set of origins and those that attract them from diverse origins.
Several studies have indicated that there is a higher risk of childhood leukaemia in general, or of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in particular, associated with higher socioeconomic status, whether measured at the level of the individual or of area of residence.4 5 6 7. Among rural areas supplying relatively large numbers of North Sea oil workers or close to very large construction sites whose workers were housed in special camps and thus subject to a lot of population mixing the excess of childhood leukaemia was most obvious in areas of high social class.8 9
We tested the population mixing hypothesis quantitatively by analysing variations in the incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children aged under 15 years at county district level throughout England and Wales according to measures of migration and commuting. Simultaneously, we analysed the effects of various indicators of socioeconomic status.
Subjects and methods LEUKAEMIA CASES
Registrations for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children below the age of 15 years in England and Wales during 1979-85 were taken from the population based National Registry of Childhood Tumours.10 Cases were ascertained from regional cancer registries, the national cancer registry at the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, regional children's tumour registries, the register of patients treated by members of the United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group, entries to the Medical Research Council's leukaemia trials, and death certificates. The diagnoses and dates of diagnosis were verified and, if necessary, amended with information from hospitals, general practitioners, and the organisers of clinical trials.
There were 2035 cases registered during the study period, with histological or haematological confirmation of diagnosis available for all but 18 (1%). During 1979-83, over 99% of incident cases of childhood leukaemia were thought to have been registered,11 and there is no reason to believe that ascertainment deteriorated from this level during 1984-5. The address at diagnosis was postcoded for each case. Census enumeration districts and hence county districts of residence were derived from the postcodes.
POPULATION DATA
Mid-year estimates of the population in age groups 0-4, 5-9, and 10-14 years in each county district and calendar year were obtained from the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys.
MEASURES OF POPULATION MIXING AND SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS
We calculated for each district the proportions of all residents and of children aged under 15 who had been resident outside the district one year previously from the small area statistics from the 1981 census.
We also distinguished quantitively between places where population increases have been large but the incomers have tended to come from a limited set of origins and those where the incomers came from a diverse set of origins. A value was assigned to each of the 403 local authority districts on the basis of the diversity of origins that the incomers to that district came from by using data extracted from the special migration statistics from the 1981 census. This statistic, based on a form of Shannon's entropy (derived from information theory),12 measures the extent to which some total population (in our case, the total incomers to a destination district) is distributed among its component parts (the origin districts). Thus, for each destination we can measure the Shannon's entropy (H
From the special workplace statistics from the 1981 census we calculated the total proportion of the economically active population in each district who were commuting to another district and the proportion commuting to another district by public transport. We also calculated the proportion in the armed forces for each district as they form a particularly mobile group and a previous study had found an association between mortality from childhood leukaemia and the presence of large military camps.13
The same three measures of socioeconomic status of districts derived from the small area statistics were used as for the previous national study of incidence during 1969-83.6 These were proportion of economically active men who were working ("employment"); proportion of households with car ("car owner"); and proportion of households that were owner occupied ("housing tenure"). Areas where these proportions were high were taken to be areas of high socioeconomic status. As large scale sales of local authority housing did not begin until 1981, this will have had only a small effect on the housing tenure variable. Again, as in the earlier study, a summary "socioeconomic score" was defined as the average of the standardised deviates for each of the three variables. The centiles of the three variables and the values of the socioeconomic score in the present study relate to England and Wales alone and therefore differ from those in the previous study which also included Scotland.
STATISTICAL METHODS
As in the previous national study of socioeconomic factors, possible relations between incidence rates and the variables listed above were investigated by Poisson regression methods by using the GLIM statistical package. Throughout the analyses, a multiplicative model was used--that is, log(m/p) = b
Each variable was analysed in two ways. The first was to consider it as a continuous variable with the aim of investigating trends in incidence with that variable. The second was to consider it as a categorical variable, with districts classified as those below the 10th centile, between the 10th and 90th centiles, and above the 90th centile with respect to the variable in question. The aim here was to investigate the possibility that while variations in a factor within a "normal" range might have no discernible effect on incidence, threshold effects may be of importance.14
The significance of the improved goodness of fit obtained by adding variables to the Poisson regression model was tested by the reduction in scaled deviance, which approximately follows a
2 distribution.
Results
The national annual incidence rates per million for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia were 48.7 (SE 1.5) at age 0-4, 26.6 (1.1) at age 5-9, and 15.7 (0.8) at age 10-14. When the Poisson model was fitted for uniform incidence across all districts, there was significant variation between districts at ages 0-4 (deviance 472.9 on 402 df; P<0.01) and 5-9 (465.7; P<0.02) but not at age 10-14 (404.5; P>0.4).
UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS
Table 1 shows the numbers of cases and incidence rates for the three age groups in the bottom 40, middle 323, and top 40 county districts according to the demographic and socioeconomic variables listed above. Table 2 gives the results of fitting these as continuous and categorical variables, expressed as the reduction in scaled deviance attributable to the variable in question compared with a uniform national incidence.
Table 1--Numbers of cases and incidence rates per million (SE) in bottom 40, middle 323, and top 40 of country districts classified by demographic
and socioeconomic variables
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Age 0-4 Age 5-9 Age 10-14
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Detail Bottom Middle Top Bottom Middle Top Bottom Middle Top
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total migration 191; 43.4 (3.1) 757; 49.5 (1.8) 91; 55.1 (5.8) 112; 24.7 (2.3) 421; 26.6 (1.3) 50; 31.2 (4.4) 82; 15.0 (1.7) 303; 16.0 (0.9) 28; 15.1 (2.9)
Child migration 183; 41.3 (3.1) 784; 50.3 (1.8) 72; 54.1 (6.4) 105; 23.1 (2.3) 426; 26.6 (1.3) 52; 36.9 (5.1) 89; 16.2 (1.7) 306; 16.0 (0.9) 18; 11.0 (2.6)
Total commuting 119; 44.1 (4.0) 797; 48.7 (1.7) 123; 53.9 (4.9) 80; 28.8 (3.2) 438; 26.0 (1.2) 65; 27.9 (3.5) 57; 17.0 (2.3) 311; 15.5 (0.9) 45; 16.0 (2.4)
Public transport
commuting 79; 58.0 (6.5) 799; 47.3 (1.7) 161; 52.0 (4.1) 49; 34.0 (4.9) 467; 26.6 (1.2) 67; 22.8 (2.8) 29; 16.8 (3.1) 331; 15.8 (0.9) 53; 15.2 (2.1)
Employment in
forces 125; 55.0 (4.9) 831; 47.6 (1.6) 83; 51.5 (5.7) 52; 23.0 (3.2) 476; 26.4 (1.2) 55; 32.7 (4.4) 41; 15.2 (2.4) 345; 16.0 (0.9) 27; 13.8 (2.7)
Employment 138; 40.1 (3.4) 826; 50.6 (1.8) 75; 47.0 (5.4) 86; 24.9 (2.7) 451; 26.8 (1.3) 46; 27.1 (4.0) 72; 17.1 (2.0) 314; 15.7 (0.9) 27; 13.5 (2.6)
With car 162; 47.7 (3.7) 799; 48.9 (1.7) 78; 48.3 (5.4) 74; 22.6 (2.6) 464; 27.4 (1.3) 45; 25.9 (3.9) 63; 15.7 (2.0) 316; 15.7 (0.9) 34; 16.5 (2.8)
Housing tenure 138; 46.2 (3.9) 830; 49.6 (1.7) 71; 43.1 (5.1) 63; 22.1 (2.8) 470; 27.1 (1.2) 50; 28.6 (4.0) 59; 17.0 (2.2) 322; 15.6 (0.9) 32; 15.3 (2.7)
Socioeconomic
score 161; 44.2 (3.5) 807; 50.0 (1.8) 71; 45.1 (5.3) 81; 23.2 (2.6) 457; 27.3 (1.3) 45; 26.4 (3.9) 72; 16.9 (2.0) 313; 15.7 (0.9) 28; 13.8 (2.6) |
Table 2--Reductions in scaled deviance (approximately |
For age 0-4 there were significant increasing trends in incidence with the proportions of recent incomers in the total population and child population and with the proportion of economically active men in employment. Child migration and employment were also significant when fitted as grouped variables. For age 5-9 there were significant trends with child migration (but not with total migration), with proportion of workers in the armed forces, and with proportion of households with a car. Only child migration was significant as a grouped variable, and there was a particularly high incidence in districts with the highest proportion of children who had moved into the district within the past year. For age 10-14 there were no significant reductions in scaled deviance by fitting any variable in either model, though there was a suggestion of low incidence in districts with a high proportion of child migrants.
MIGRATION DIVERSITY AND DISTANCE
Table 3 shows the results of fitting the relative entropy due to migration and the log mean distance between districts moved by incoming migrants with allowance for the proportion of migrants in the population. At age 0-4 neither of these additional factors produced a significant reduction in deviance, whereas at age 5-9 they both did. The improvement in fit with total migration and entropy or log mean distance (9.7 or 10.1 on 2 df), however, was less than that obtained by fitting child migration alone (7.8 on 1 df). As explained above, no information was available on the districts of origin of the child migrants.
Table 3--Reductions in scaled deviance (approximately |
MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS
For the age group 0-4 no combination of two variables gave significant reductions in scaled deviance both for the first variable and for the second with allowance for the first. For the continuous variable model applied to the age group 5-9, after we fitted the proportion of workers in the armed forces, we obtained a significant further reduction in scaled deviance by fitting the proportion of child migrants (reduction in deviance 4.1; P<0.05); the proportion in the armed forces, however, did not yield any further significant reduction after first fitting the variable for child migration.
Discussion
Since the publication in 1988 of Kinlen's original finding of an increased incidence of childhood leukaemia in Kirkcaldy district, which included Glenrothes New Town, during the period of rapid expansion of Glenrothes,1 there have been numerous further studies which have supported his hypothesis of an infectious basis for childhood leukaemia.2 9 These studies, however, were all concerned with threshold effects--that is, they focused on incidence rates in areas where an unusually high amount of population mixing had occurred. Our analysis is the first to show a significant relation between population mixing and incidence of childhood leukaemia other than at the extremes of variation.
MIGRATION
Two other studies have investigated the occurrence of childhood leukaemia in relation to population increase. Langford analysed mortality from all childhood leukaemia during 1969-73 and found higher rates in areas that experienced a population increase between 1961 and 1971 of more than 50%, presumably largely due to migration.14 Rodrigues et al analysed national data for 1979-83 in census tracts classified by percentage change in childhood population between 1971 and 1981.7 They found no overall trend but a significantly raised incidence of lymphocytic leukaemia in census tracts of high socioeconomic status within predominantly rural county districts which had undergone an increase of more than 40% in the child population. The relative importance of incoming migrant children and increased numbers of births within census tracts in producing the increase in the childhood population of these census tracts was unknown. In a small case-control study in northern England, children with leukaemia or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were slightly more likely to have moved house between birth and diagnosis than their controls who were matched for age and area of birth, but the differences were not significant.15
The results relating to migration may be tentatively explained in terms of the age of susceptible members of the population at exposure to the relevant infection. In areas with high levels of inward migration young children would tend to be infected earlier, producing a raised incidence of leukaemia in early childhood. By the age of 10-14 many susceptible children may have already long since been infected, and their incidence of leukaemia is correspondingly low. A similar explanation of immunising doses of infection was suggested for the deficits of leukaemia among older children and adolescents in new towns.3 The raised incidence of leukaemia at age 5-9 in districts with high proportions of child migrants is consistent with the transfer of viruses at school. Interestingly, two studies which used different methods to investigate space-time clustering among children diagnosed during 1966-83 found especially strong clustering at ages 5-916 or 4-7,17 though neither report mentioned the increase in social contacts at school among children of these ages.
COMMUTING
We found no significant relation between commuting and incidence of leukaemia. This may seem inconsistent with the results of an earlier study of Kinlen et al, who found a raised incidence in districts where there had been a large increase in commuting,18 but districts with high commuting in our study would include those where it had been high for a long time. It is arguable that a change from low to even moderately high levels of commuting could have a greater effect on herd immunity than a sustained high level throughout.
SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS
Our results on the relation between socioeconomic status and incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia are similar to those of Draper and colleagues.6 This is not surprising as the two analyses have a large number of cases in common. In multivariate analysis, no two indicators of population mixing and socioeconomic status were of independent significance. The two types of variable are correlated; in particular, areas of low unemployment naturally attract more incoming families and families of higher social class tend to be more mobile. Thus it is impossible to tell the extent to which each of these factors is independently of importance in affecting the incidence of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. As population mixing is more likely than socioeconomic status to increase rapidly and some of the highest incidence rates for leukaemia have been found in situations of very high increases in levels of mixing, it seems reasonable to conclude that population mixing is of more fundamental importance. Previous studies which have revealed a social class effect on the incidence of childhood leukaemia may in fact have been observing indirectly a population mixing effect.
The present study has provided evidence of an effect of population mixing on the incidence of childhood leukaemia which is not confined to areas experiencing the most extreme levels of mixing. The analysis at district level is nevertheless arguably not sufficiently sensitive and we propose in future to analyse more recent, and hence independent, incidence data at ward level by using flow data from the 1991 census. That census is also the first to provide reliable migrant flow data disaggregated by age group, thus making it possible to investigate specifically the possible effect on incidence of leukaemia of the diversity of origins of incoming children. These further analyses may also enable the effects of population mixing and socioeconomic status to be disentangled more completely.
We are grateful to regional cancer registries, regional children's tumour registries, the UK Children's Cancer Study Group, the Clinical Trial Service Unit, and OPCS for providing notifications of cases of childhood leukaemia. We thank the many people who have worked on the National Registry of Childhood Tumours, particularly Mrs M B Allen, Mr T J Vincent, Dr E M Eatock, Mr M J Loach, Mrs P A Brownbill, Mrs J Williams, Miss A Berry, and Miss A Sabin. We thank Mrs E M Roberts for secretarial assistance. The 1981 census data are Crown Copyright.
Funding: The Childhood Cancer Research Group is supported by the Department of Health and the Scottish Home and Health Department.
Conflict of interest: None.