Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
a Centre for Drug Misuse Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RT
Correspondence to: Dr McKeganey.
There has been growing concern within the media and elsewhere over the recent development of alcoholic drinks which in aspects of their marketing, and in some cases their sweet taste, may particularly appeal to young people. These drinks include such white ciders as Ice Dragon, TNT, White Lightening, and Spectra White (many of which contain about 8% alcohol by volume), as well as such fruit wines as Maddog 20/20, Flavours for Ravers, and Fruits Unlimited (many of which contain about 13% alcohol by volume). We provide information on the consumption of these drinks in a representative sample of schoolchildren in Dundee, Scotland. These data were collected as part of an ongoing survey of young people's routes into illicit drug use.1
Subjects, methods, and results
In November 1994, a 1 in 10 sample of all comprehensive school children in compulsory school years S1 to S4 (age 12 to 15) in Dundee was surveyed (n = 758). The five schools participating in this research were selected in consultation with the local education authority as being broadly representative of Dundee's demography. Two mixed ability classes were randomly chosen from each school year, and the researchers administered the questionnaire under examination conditions, with the teacher absent. All of the schoolchildren present on the day of the researchers' visit completed the questionnaire, although no information is available on absentees. Informed consent was obtained from the young people, parents, and teachers. Using the Carstairs and Morris DEPCAT system for 1991 census statistics,2 we categorised 51.4% of the young people as living within a deprived area.
Overall, 66.1% of the schoolchildren reported having consumed a whole alcoholic drink. By first year of secondary school almost one in five (18.9%) of the schoolchildren reported having been drunk on at least one occasion. By age 14 more than half of the schoolchildren (52.6%) reported having been drunk.
Table 1 shows the range and frequency of alcoholic drinks consumed as well as the levels of self reported drunkenness. In all school years, consumers of white ciders or fruit wines were significantly more likely to have been drunk (S1,
2 = 8.06, df = 1, P<0.005; S2,
2 = 10.67, df = 1, P<0.001; S3,
2 = 25.81, df = 1, P<0.001; and S4,
2 = 11.78, df = 1, P<0.001).
Table 1--Alcohol consumption in 12-15 year olds at comprehensive schools in Dundee.
Of the 758 schoolchildren surveyed, 257 did not drink alcohol
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean units
Mean days consumed on
Type of alcohol most No (%) ever drinking in most recent
recently consumed No been drunk past year occasion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
White cider 132 115 (87) 27.9 10.2
Ordinary cider 29 16 (55) 28.9 5.2
Premium lager 80 46 (57) 31.3 12.4
Ordinary beer 82 35 (42) 14.3 6.8
Fruit wine 43 37 (86) 26.8 12.7
Ordinary wine 60 7 (11) 8.9 1.8
Vodka 52 42 (80) 31.5 9.9
Other spirits 14 9 (64) 25.6 11.9
Other 19 10 (52) 13.1 3.6
Don't know 70 24 (34) 15.9 --
All new drinks (white cider plus
fruit wine) 170 147 (86) 28.2 10.6
Total drinkers 501 328 (65) 22.3 8.4 |
The peak age for consumers of the white ciders was 14, whereas the proportions of young people consuming fruit wines increased steadily across all of the age ranges. Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted in each school year to compare the frequency of alcohol use between those who most recently consumed a white cider or fruit wine with those who most recently had any of the other drinks listed. In all years, consumers of the new drinks were found to be drinking alcohol more often, but the difference reached statistical significance only at age 14 (Mann-Whitney U test, z = 2.97, P<0.05). With increasing age, the mean number of units consumed for the new drinks converged with the mean units of old drinks (S1, 8.0 units for new drinks v 4.9 units for other drinks; S2, 9.1 v 4.6; S3, 10.6 v 7.0; S4, 13.0 v 11.5). When units of alcohol consumed most recently were compared, it was expected that, given the high alcoholic content of the new drinks, those who most recently drank any of the new drinks would have consumed more alcohol than those reporting consuming any of the other drinks listed. This was found in S1, S2, and S3 (S1, z = 4.00, P<0.001; S2, z = 5.04, P<0.001; S3, z = 3.85, P<0.001); in S4 the result was not significant (z = 1.00, P = 0.32).
Comment
The level of self reported drunkenness among young people identified in this study must give cause for concern. Clearly, such drunkenness is not solely related to the new drinks, but the fact that relatively strong alcoholic drinks are now being marketed and being widely consumed by young people is a worrying development, given what we already know about the health consequences of such alcohol consumption.3 4 As sections of the alcohol industry are now marketing alcoholic lemonades, this development is likely to continue.
We acknowledge the cooperation provided by all of the schools participating in this research. For reasons of confidentiality we are unable to identify those schools by name.
Funding: The Centre For Drug Misuse Research is funded by the Scottish Office Department of Health; the views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the funding body.
Conflict of interest: None.