BMJ 1996;312:1479 (8 June)

Letters

Raised adult blood pressure linked to failure to achieve growth potential in utero

EDITOR,--In their study of men in Uppsala, David A Leon and colleagues found that the highest blood pressures were in men who had been small babies but grew to be tall adults.1 They argue that these babies failed to achieve their growth potential in utero. We replicated their analysis in three studies of men born in England (in Hertfordshire (in 1920-30, n = 841), Preston (1935-43, n = 239), and Sheffield (1939-41, n = 170)). Their blood pressures were measured at ages 59-70, 46-54, and 50-53 respectively. Details of the methods have been published.2 3 4

Table 1 shows the results for the men living in Hertfordshire, with the groups as defined by Leon and colleagues. As in Uppsala, the inverse relation between blood pressure and birth weight was stronger in men who were taller than 176 cm (the median height in Uppsala) and the highest pressures were in men who had been small babies but were tall adults. In Preston and Sheffield, however, the relation between blood pressure and birth weight was not affected by adult height. The mean systolic pressure in men who were taller than 176 cm but had weighed less than 3250 g at birth was 154.2 mm Hg (n = 31), compared with an overall mean of 153.7 mm Hg, in Preston and 140.8 mm Hg (n = 15), compared with an overall mean of 153.7 mm Hg, in Sheffield. There was no trend in systolic or diastolic pressure across the range of birth weights in taller men in Preston or Sheffield.


Table 1--Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) at age 59-70 by birth weight and height at
examination among men resident in Hertfordshire


                                       Birth weight (g)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------                P value for
                      <3250         3250-           3750-           >/=4250      All men      trend
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Height </=176 cm     (n = 202)     (n = 245)       (n = 138)       (n = 61)      (n = 646)
Systolic               165.5         164.2           162.2)          163.3         164.1         0.12
Diastolic               90.4          90.1            88.3            89.4          89.7         0.07
Height >176 cm       (n = 32)      (n = 70)        (n = 62)        (n = 31)      (n = 195)
Systolic               174.0         164.4           161.5           161.3         164.6         0.03
Diastolic               95.8          90.6            89.7            90.1          91.1         0.07

We agree that raised blood pressure in adult life is linked to failure to achieve growth potential in utero. However, the combination of small size at birth with tall adult height indicates failure to achieve growth potential in utero only in a setting where postnatal nutrition is optimal. This may be why the men living in the relatively affluent area of Hertfordshire yield similar results to those living in Uppsala while those living in the industrial areas of Preston and Sheffield do not.

Epidemiologist Epidemiologist Clinical scientist Statistician MRC Environmental Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD

Catherine M Law, Caroline H D Fall, Christopher N Martyn, Clive Osmond 


  1. Leon DA, Koupilova I, Lithell HO, Berglund L, Mohsen R, Vagero D, et al. Failure to realise growth potential in utero and adult obesity in relation to blood pressure in 50 year old Swedish men. BMJ 1996;312:401-6. (17 February.) [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hales CN, Barker DJP, Clark PMS, Cox LJ, Fall C, Osmond C, et al. Fetal and infant growth and impaired glucose tolerance at age 64. BMJ 1991;303:1019-22.
  3. Barker DJP, Bull AR, Osmond C, Simmonds SJ. Fetal and placental size and risk of hypertension in adult life. BMJ 1990;301:259-62.
  4. Martyn CN, Barker DJP, Jespersen S, Greenwald S, Osmond C, Berry C. Growth in utero, adult blood pressure, and arterial compliance. Br Heart J 1995;73:116-21. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Are experimental treatments for cancer in children superior to established treatments? Observational study of randomised controlled trials by the Children's Oncology Group
Ambuj Kumar, Heloisa Soares, Robert Wells, Mike Clarke, Iztok Hozo, Archie Bleyer, Gregory Reaman, Iain Chalmers, and Benjamin Djulbegovic
BMJ 2005 331: 1295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Failure to realise growth potential in utero and adult obesity in relation to blood pressure in 50 year old Swedish men
David A Leon, Ilona Koupilova, Hans O Lithell, Lars Berglund, Rawya Mohsen, Denny Vagero, Ulla-Britt Lithell, and Paul M McKeigue
BMJ 1996 312: 401-406. [Abstract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Buffat, C., Boubred, F., Mondon, F., Chelbi, S. T., Feuerstein, J.-M., Lelievre-Pegorier, M., Vaiman, D., Simeoni, U. (2007). Kidney Gene Expression Analysis in a Rat Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction Reveals Massive Alterations of Coagulation Genes. Endocrinology 148: 5549-5557 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kumar, A., Soares, H., Wells, R., Clarke, M., Hozo, I., Bleyer, A., Reaman, G., Chalmers, I., Djulbegovic, B. (2005). Are experimental treatments for cancer in children superior to established treatments? Observational study of randomised controlled trials by the Children's Oncology Group. BMJ 331: 1295- [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Smith, G. D., Phillips, A. N (1996). Passive smoking and health: should we believe Philip Morris's "experts"?. BMJ 313: 929-933 [Full text]  
  • Stephenson, T., Walker, D. A (1996). Telling parents all relevant details might reduce recruitment of children to trials. BMJ 313: 362b-363 [Full text]  



Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview