Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
a Section of Gerontology, Department of Pathology, Leiden University Hospital, Building 1 P3-Q, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands, b Section of Dutch Nursing Home Medicine, Department of General Practice, Leiden University, PO Box 2088, 2301 RC Leiden, c WHO National Influenza Centre for the Netherlands, Department of Virology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
Correspondence to: Dr Remarque.
Serological studies have yielded conflicting results about the antibody response to influenza vaccines in elderly people1--hence the association of advanced age with declined protection is in question. Differences in subjects' state of health may be one reason for the divergent findings.1 2 We therefore investigated the influence of chronic disease, drug treatment, and functional disability on the immune response to influenza vaccine in elderly people.
Subjects, methods, and results
Influenza vaccine was offered to all of the patients in one nursing home in Delft, the Netherlands, who were not terminally ill. A total of 175 patients gave their informed consent and were included in the study. Their mean age was 82 (SD 7), and 133 patients were women. The study was approved by the medical faculty ethics committee. Activities of daily living, illness, and drug treatment at the time of vaccination were recorded from multidisciplinary patient files. Activities of daily living were assessed according to the questionnaire of Katz et al3 (six items), with higher scores indicating greater dependency (bottom third 0-6, middle third 7-9, and top third 10-12 points). The mean score was 8 (3).
The vaccine for the 1990-1 season (Influvac whole virus, Solvay-Duphar, the Netherlands) contained A/Taiwan/1/86 (H1N1) and A/Guizhou/54/89 (H3N2), both with 15 µg haemagglutinin, and B/Beijing/1/87 and B/Yamagata/16/88, both with 10 µg haemagglutinin. The vaccine was given intramuscularly in the deltoid region. A blood sample was taken just before vaccination and a mean of 21 days (range 19-23) later. Titres of IgG antibody against the vaccine strains were determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as described previously.4 To obtain normality, antibody titres were log
Katz score was inversely correlated with postvaccination titre for all strains (table 1). After vaccination patients with Katz scores in the top third had about half the antibody titre of patients with Katz scores in the bottom third. Prevaccination titres correlated with postvaccination titres for all strains under investigation. Men had higher postvaccination titres, but this was significant only for the A/Guizhou strain. Patients with cardiovascular or pulmonary disease had lower postvaccination titres for B/Beijing. Titres of influenza specific IgG increased significantly in all patients, but they were not optimal in functionally disabled patients.
Table 1--Effects of significant explanatory variables* on postvaccination titre in 175 elderly patients (stepwise multiple
regression analysis)+
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effect on postvaccination titre
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Explanatory variable A/Taiwan A/Guizhou B/Beijing B/Yamagata
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prevaccination titre 1.58 (1.47 to 1.71) 1.50 (1.40 to 1.61) 1.66 (1.55 to 1.78) 1.69 (1.56 to 1.82)
Katz score 0.94 (0.90 to 0.97) 0.94 (0.90 to 0.97) 0.94 (0.91 to 0.98) 0.95 (0.91 to 0.98)
Male sex 1.27 (0.97 to 1.66) 1.33 (1.02 to 1.72) 1.17 (0.93 to 1.48) 1.19 (0.95 to 1.49)
Cardiovascular and pulmonary disease 1.09 (0.85 to 1.41) 0.84 (0.66 to 1.08) 0.79 (0.63 to 0.996) 0.85 (0.68 to 1.07)
Previous influenza vaccination 0.81 (0.65 to 1.01) 0.81 (0.66 to 1.01) 0.89 (0.73 to 1.09) 0.93 (0.76 to 1.14)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Expressed as 2ß of estimate from regression analysis, where ß is estimate. Figures in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.
+Regression model was: lgG day 21=constantxpelog(lgG day 0xkeKatz scorexgemale sexxcpecardiovascular and pulmonary diseasexpveprevious vaccination
where pe=effect of prevaccination titre, ke=effect of Katz score, ge=effect of sex, cpe=effect of cardiovascular and pulmonary
disease, and pve=effect of previous vaccination given in table 1. Male sex, cardiovascular and pulmonary disease, and previous
vaccination were dummy variables coded as 1 for presence and 0 for absence. |
Comment
Although the increase in antibody titres was not optimal in functionally disabled patients, this should not be a reason for not vaccinating them as the rise that does occur indicates a reduced susceptibility to influenza.5 Because functionally disabled elderly patients have decreased immune responses to influenza vaccine, the risk of influenza infections is expected to be higher. These patients have poor health and therefore the risk of secondary complications is probably higher. Thus, in the event of an influenza A epidemic, these patients could receive antiviral chemoprophylaxis.
The association between functional disability and lower immune responses to influenza vaccine is in agreement with Gross et al, who used the chronic health evaluation scale.2 In elderly patients with long term illness they found a lower immune response only to an antigenically new vaccine strain,2 whereas we consistently found correlations between Katz score and all of the vaccine strains investigated.
Funding: This research was partly funded by the Netherlands organisation for applied scientific research (TNO. The vaccine was a gift from Solvay-Duphar.
Conflict of interest: None.