BMJ 1996;312:636 (9 March)

Letters

Legalisation would be likely to result in increased use

EDITOR,--I strongly disagree with the numerous assertions by Richard Smith that legalising or decriminalising drugs is the answer to the drug problem.1 The first major misconception is that legalisation or decriminalisation would result in an overall decrease in the problems associated with drug use. As DuPont and I pointed out in our detailed consideration of drug policy, any reduction in the intensity of drug policy is likely to result in an increase in drug use and associated problems.2 An excellent example of this is the drastic difference in the use of marijuana compared with the use of alcohol and tobacco among adolescents. These drugs are all illegal for young people, yet the legal drugs are far more heavily used.

Dutch drug policy is an excellent example of misguided drug policy. While Smith's editorial discusses drug use in the Netherlands until 1985, drug use among Dutch males aged 12-18 increased 277% from 1984 to 1992, and the number of users of marijuana rose 50% from 1991 to 1993.3 Crime has increased drastically, with shootings increasing by 40%, car thefts by 62%, and robberies by 69%.4 That is understandable, since in the United States about half of violent crimes are committed under the influence of drugs.5

The reality that we face in the United States and elsewhere is that we have only partially fought a drug war. We need to bolster efforts to prevent drug use and to broaden the availability of treatment. In addition, we should put teeth into prohibition and imprisonment. Drug dealers deal their drugs with minimal fear of imprisonment. Federal inmates imprisoned for trafficking in marijuana possessed on average 3.6 tonnes, while those imprisoned for trafficking in cocaine possessed on average 83 kg. We should consider even more stringent penalties for high level dealers and move towards pressuring casual users to refuse drugs through the use of drug testing and intervention.

Lastly, all of us need to sing from the same hymnal. Internationally, so many people are heading in so many directions that the public does not know whom to follow. It is particularly important that prestigious medical journals do not lead the public down a harmful road by proposing legalisation or decriminalisation.

Chairman International Drug Strategy Institute, 901 Garfield, Topeka, KS 66606, USA

Eric A Voth 


  1. Smith R. The war on drugs. BMJ 1995;311:1655-6. (23-30 December.) [Free Full Text]
  2. DuPont RL, Voth EA. Drug legalization, harm reduction, and drug policy. Ann Intern Med 1995;123:461-5. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Zwart WM, Mensink C. Alcohol, tabak, drugs en gokken in cijfers. Rotterdam: National Institute for Alcohol and Drugs, 1993.
  4. Criminal Investigation Department. Recherche 1993: centrale recherche informatie 1993 report. Rotterdam: CID, 1993.
  5. US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. The costs of illegal drug use. In: Drugs, crime, and the criminal justice system. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1992:126-7. (NCJ-133652.)

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



Access all current jobs at BMJ Group
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ
Listen to the latest 

BMJ Interview