BMJ 1995;311:572 (26 August)

Letters

Antithrombotic prophylaxis had little effect on overall mortality

EDITOR,--C J Todd and colleagues report that antithrombotic prophylaxis significantly reduces the incidence of fatal pulmonary embolism.1 From their remarks in their results section, I assume that their diagnoses of fatal pulmonary embolism were made at postmortem examination. It would be interesting to know what the rate of postmortem examination at each hospital was for this review as this would have a bearing on the number of deaths due to pulmonary embolism.

With regard to their figures for mortality, it is also important to look at other causes of death, such as bleeding and complications arising from wound sepsis.2 How many deaths were due to these problems? In figure 1 they indicate that hospitals 3, 5, 7, and 8 were low users of antithrombotic prophylaxis. The 90 day survival curves indicate, however, that there was little difference in overall mortality between the hospitals other than hospital 6 (if there was any, hospitals 3, 5, 7, and 8 seem to have had slightly better survival than hospitals 1, 2, and 4). The authors' data show that the overall mortality in hospitals 1, 2, 4, and 6 (which used antithrombotic prophylaxis more frequently) was 20% at 90 days while that in hospitals 3, 5, 7, and 8 was 18%. Thus while fatal pulmonary embolism may be more common when antithrombotic prophylaxis is not used, overall mortality may not be very different between patients in whom it is used and those in whom it is not. It would thus be interesting to know what the overall mortality was in each group of patients.

An important concern regarding routine use of antithrombotic prophylaxis is an increase in the incidence of complications related to the wound. Was there any difference in the overall infection rate between the patients who had antithrombotic prophylaxis and those who did not?

Consultant orthopaedic surgeon Homerton Hospital NHS Trust, London E9 6SR

K C Kong 


  1. Todd CJ, Freeman CJ, Camilleri-Ferrante C, Palmer CR, Hyder A, Laxton CE, et al. Differences in mortality after fracture of hip: the East Anglian audit. BMJ 1995;310:904-8. (8 April.) [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Differences in mortality after fracture of hip: the East Anglian audit
C J Todd, C J Freeman, C Camilleri-Ferrante, C R Palmer, A Hyder, C E Laxton, M J Parker, B V Payne, and N Rushton
BMJ 1995 310: 904-908. [Abstract] [Full Text]




Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview