BMJ 1995;310:88-90 (14 January)

Papers

Bottle feeding and the sudden infant death syndrome

R E Gilbert, lecturer in epidemiology,a R E Wigfield, research fellow,b P J Fleming, consultant paediatrician,b P J Berry, professor of perinatal pathology,d P T Rudd, consultant paediatrician c

a Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, London, WC1N 1EH, b Department of Child Health, St Michael's Hospital, Bristol BS2 8EG, c Bath Unit for Research into Paediatrics, Royal United Hospital, Bath BA1 3NG, d Department of Paediatric Pathology, St Michael's Hospital, Bristol BS2 8EG

Correspondence to: Dr Gilbert.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the risk of the sudden infant death syndrome is increased in bottle fed babies.
Design: Population based case-control study matching for age and time.
Subjects: All babies aged 1 week to 1 year dying of sudden infant death syndrome during November 1987 to April 1989 or February 1990 to June 1991 and two live controls.
Setting: Avon and north Somerset.
Main outcome measures: Breast or bottle feeding, sleeping position, maternal smoking, parental employment, and length of gestation.
Results: Compared with being fully breast fed, the crude odds ratio for sudden infant death in fully bottle fed babies was 3.1 and for mixed breast and bottle fed babies 1.5. These odds ratios fell to 1.8 (95% confidence interval 0.7 to 4.8) and 1.2 (0.5 to 2.7) respectively after maternal smoking, parental employment, preterm gestation, and sleeping position had been adjusted for. Sleeping position partly masked the effect of being bottle fed on sudden infant death as breast fed babies were more likely to have slept prone than bottle fed babies.
Conclusions: Bottle feeding is not a significant independent risk factor for the sudden infant death syndrome. Patterns of maternal smoking, preterm gestation, and parental employment status account for most of the apparent association with bottle feeding.

Key messages

  • Key messages

  • Bottle fed babies are more likely to have mothers who smoke, to be born preterm, and to come from poorer families, factors which are in themselves linked with the sudden infant death syndrome

  • Inclusion of maternal smoking, preterm gestation, and parental unemployment in the analysis substantially reduced the association between risk of sudden death and being bottle fed

  • Being fully bottle fed is not a significant independent risk factor for the sudden infant death syndrome

Introduction

Over the past 25 years the effect of method of feeding on the risk of the sudden infant death syndrome has been analysed in 17 case-control studies1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1616 17 and one cohort study.18 These studies were designed to investigate a variety of risk factors for the sudden infant death syndrome, including bottle feeding. Eleven studies7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 found an increased risk of sudden death in bottle fed babies and seven found no effect.1 2 3 4 5 6 18 Reasons for such inconsistent results include different ways of measuring type of feeding and variations in the degree to which confounding factors were taken into account.

Bottle feeding is largely determined by social and cultural factors and is strongly associated with maternal smoking.19 20 Of the 11 studies which found a positive association between being bottle fed and the sudden infant death syndrome, only two accounted for confounding due to social factors and preterm gestation or low birth weight,15 17 and only one study in New Zealand17 included maternal smoking and sleeping position as potential confounders in the analysis. In the New Zealand study the adjusted odds ratio for the sudden infant death syndrome associated with being fully bottle fed at postnatal discharge from hospital was 2.45 (95% confidence interval 1.32 to 4.55). This result led to the promotion of breast feeding as part of a national cot death prevention programme launched in 1991.21 In Britain calls for the promotion of breast feeding in order to protect against the sudden infant death syndrome22 have met with concern that the New Zealand findings should be supported by other studies.23 The aim of this study was to determine whether being bottle fed has an independent effect on the sudden infant death syndrome.

Subjects and methods

We carried out two case-control studies, each lasting 18 months, in a geographically defined population in Avon and north Somerset. The study periods were from November 1987 to April 1989 and from February 1990 to June 1991. The study design was similar for both study periods and has been described.24 25 For each baby who died of the sudden infant death syndrome we selected two babies matched for age and time from the health visitor list for the index case.

Questions about feeding practice related to how the baby was fed after birth and whether there had been any subsequent change up until death or interview. The analysis was principally based on babies categorised as fully breast fed, mixed breast and bottle fed (representing either a mix of breast and bottle feeding or a change from breast to bottle feeding), and fully bottle fed (never breast fed). Solid feeds were excluded from this classification. Potential confounding variables were recorded at parental interview. These comprised employment status (registrar general's classification I-V compared with unemployed father or unsupported mother); maternal smoking (mother smoked or did not smoke during pregnancy); sleeping position on the night before death or interview (prone, compared with side, or back); gestation (>/=37 completed weeks of pregnancy compared with <37 weeks).

We combined data for the two study periods because the adjusted odds ratios for being bottle fed were similar in both study periods. Crude and adjusted odds ratios for the sudden infant death syndrome were derived by conditional logistic regression analysis. The confounding variable which most improved the fit of the logistic regression model was chosen first and additional variables were added in a stepwise multivariate analysis. Variables which did not significantly improve the fit of the model or significantly alter the odds ratio were discarded from the analysis. The study was designed to have 80% power at a 5% level of significance to detect an unadjusted twofold increased risk of sudden infant death in fully bottle fed compared with ever breast fed babies, assuming an unmatched design and given a prevalence of bottlefeeding from birth of 25%. The EGRET statistical package was used to carry out the conditional logistic regression analysis. Confidence intervals were derived from standard errors of maximum likelihood estimates.

Results

A total of 107 sudden infant deaths occurred in the study area during the two study periods. Nine babies who died of the sudden infant death syndrome were excluded from the analysis because of insufficient data, but they did not differ from the group studied.25 26 The mean age of the 98 babies dying of the sudden infant death syndrome who were included in the analysis was 103 days (5th to 95th centiles: 27-218 days). Sixty seven of the babies died during November 1987-April 1989 and 31 died during February 1990-June 1991. The large fall in the incidence of the sudden infant death syndrome in the second period seemed to be associated with local and national publicity about the increased risk of the sudden infant death syndrome in babies who sleep prone.25

The table gives the number of babies in each feed group and the crude and adjusted odds ratios. Analysis of the control group showed that fully breast fed babies were more likely to have non-smoking mothers (35% (46/131) v 19% (12/62) smoking mothers, P=0.002); to have fathers in employment (32% (56/176) v 15% (3/20) unemployed fathers or unsupported mothers, P=0.2); to be term babies (31% (59/192) v 0% (0/4) preterm P=0.3); and to have slept prone (34% (32/93) v 25% (25/100) slept on side or back, P=0.3).

We tested for an interaction between the adjusted odds ratio for the sudden infant death syndrome (any breast feeding compared with fully bottle fed) and the following variables using a multiplicative model: first and second study period (P=0.3; {chi}2=2.4 df=2); maternal smoking (P=0.8; {chi}2=0.53 df=2); and prone sleeping position (P=0.4, {chi}2=0.80 df=1). The proportion of fully breast fed control babies who slept prone fell from 68% (2

6/38) to 32% (6/19)between the two study periods and the proportion who were mixed or fully bottle fed fell from 54% (50/93) to 26% (11/43).

We repeated the analysis using alternative categorisations for the type of feed. The odds ratios for the sudden infant death syndrome for bottle fed babies compared with babies who were ever breast fed was 2.3 (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 4.0), falling to 1.7 (0.7 to 3.7) after the confounders listed in the table were adjusted for. The mixed breast and bottle fed category was further subdivided into babies who were given both breast and bottle feeds beyond 28 days of age and babies who had been switched from breast to bottle before 28 days of age. The adjusted odds ratios for these categories were 1.0 (0.4 to 2.6; 20 cases, 46 controls) and 1.5 (0.5 to 4.5; 19 cases, 39 controls) respectively ({chi}2 test for trend for four level categorisation, P=0.17).


Matched, crude and adjusted odds ratios for the sudden infant death syndrome associated with being bottle fed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                        Odds ratio (95% confidence interval)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                                       Adjusted for
                         No (%) dying of                                                                                            sleeping position,
                       sudden infant death                                                                      Adjusted for       maternal smoking,
                           syndrome         No (%) of controls                         Adjusted for          sleeping position      gestat

ion, andType of milk feed           (n=98)              (n=196)            Crude            sleeping position      and maternal smoking   employment status*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fully breast fed            17 (17)              59 (30)         1.0                1.0                      1.0                    1.0
Mixed breast/bottle         39 (40)              85 (43)         1.5 (0.8 to 3.0)   1.7 (0.8 to 3.5)         1.4 (0.7 to 3.0)       1.2 (0.5 to 2.7)
Fully bottle fed            42 (43)              52 (26)         3.1 (1.5 to 6.3)   3.3 (1.4 to 7.4)         2.4 (1.0 to 5.9)       1.8 (0.7 to 4.8)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P value+                                                              0.005              0.012                    0.12                   0.44++
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Analysis based on 98 sudden infant death syndrome victims and 190 control babies because of missing data.
+Based on likelihood ratio statistic for the addition of type of feed to the logistic regression model, two degrees of freedom.
++{chi}2 for trend=0.23.

Discussion

Babies who had been fully bottle fed from birth seemed to be at greater risk of the sudden infant death syndrome than babies who had been fully breast fed. However, this effect was not significant once confounding due to the prone sleeping position, maternal smoking, parental unemployment, and preterm gestation had been taken into account. Sleeping prone was an important negative confounder, being weakly associated with breast feeding in the control group (P=0.3) and strongly associated with the sudden infant death syndrome.24 25 More breast fed babies may ha

ve slept prone because their mothers were more likelyto adhere to previous advice to put babies to sleep prone. However, mothers who breast fed and those who bottle fed responded similarly to the publicity about the risks associated with prone sleeping. Alternatively, babies who are breast fed may be more likely to fall asleep prone on or at the side of the mother after feeding.

The crude association between being bottle fed and the sudden infant death syndrome was greatly reduced after maternal smoking, employment status, and preterm gestation were adjusted for. There was a trend for the risk of the sudden infant death syndrome to increase with the amount of bottle feeding, but this was not significant. Inclusion of more precise measurements of social and cultural determinants of bottle feeding would probably have further reduced the effect of being bottle fed on the sudden infant death syndrome. The importance of residual confounding due to social and cultural factors is likely to be greater if one type of feeding is particularly uncommon. For example, in the New Zealand study only 15% of control babies were fully bottle fed. In this relatively unusual group, bottle feeding may have been associated with specific social or cultural characteristics that may not have been included in the analysis of confounding factors.17

Although we did not find that bottle feeding was significantly associated with an increase risk of the sudden infant death syndrome, our results are consistent with an adjusted odds ratio for sudden infant death (fully bottle fed compared with ever breast fed) of up to 3.7. Larger studies may be able to distinguish a small independent effect of being bottle fed. However, the interpretation of the relation between bottle feeding and the sudden infant death syndrome should take account of two theoretical considerations which work in different directions. Firstly, the apparent effect of being bottle fed on sudden infant death may be the result of residual confounding due to social and cult

uralfactors even after controlling for measures of these factors in the analysis. Secondly, being bottle fed may lie on a causal pathway between social and cultural factors and the sudden infant death syndrome; adjustment for these factors may therefore mask a real effect of being bottle fed on sudden infant death.

From a public health perspective promotion of breast feeding to protect against the sudden infant death syndrome cannot be justified without clear evidence of an independent effect from a range of studies. Nevertheless, there is sufficient evidence of the nutritional and immunological advantages of breast milk to justify the promotion of breast feeding as the optimal method of early infant feeding in both preterm27 28 29 and term30 31 babies in industrialised countries.

We are grateful to the Foundation for the Study of Infant Death, and The Wellcome Trust for financial support and to David Dunn and Mike Woolridge for advice on the analysis and interpretation of the results.

  1. Frogart P, Lynas MA, MacKenzie G. Epidemiology of sudden unexpected death in infants (cot death) in Northern Ireland. Br J Prev Soc Med 1971;49:119-34.
  2. Kraus AS, Steele R, Thompson MG, de Grosbois P. Further epidemiologic observations on sudden death in infancy in Ontario. Can J Public Health1971;62:210-18.
  3. Rhead WJ, Schrauzer GN, Saltstein SL. Sudden death in infancy and vitamin E deficiency (letter). BMJ 1973;iv:548-9.
  4. Fedrick J. Sudden unexpected death in infants in the Oxford Record Linkage Area. Br J Prev Soc Med 1974;28:164-71. [Medline]
  5. Engelberts AC. Cot deaths in the Netherlands. An epidemiological study [thesis]. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1991.
  6. Kraus JF, Greenland S, Bulterys M. Risk factors for sudden infant death in the US collaborative perinatal project. Int J Epidemiol 1989;18:113-20. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Carpenter RG, Shaddick CW. Role of infection, suffocation and bottle feeding in cot death. An analysis of some factors in the histories of 110 cases and their controls. Br J Prev Soc Med 1965;19:1-7. [Medline]
  8. Protestos CD, Carpenter RG, McWeeny PM, Emery JL. Obstetric and perinatal histories of children who died unexpectedly (cot death). Arch Dis Child 1973;48:835-41. [Medline]
  9. Biering-Sorensen F, Jorgensen T, Hilden J. Sudden infant death in Copenhagen. Acta Paediatr Scand 1978;67:129-37. [Medline]
  10. Watson E, Gardner A, Carpenter RG. An epidemiological and sociological study of unexpected death in infancy in nine areas of Southern England. Med Sci Law 1981;21:78-98. [Medline]
  11. Harris JDC, Radford M, Wailoo M, Carpenter RG, Machin K. Sudden infant death in Southampton and an evaluation of the Sheffield scoring system. J Epidemiol Community Health 1982;36:162-6. [Medline]
  12. Murphy FJ, Newcombe RG, Sibert JR. The epidemiology of sudden infant death syndrome. J Epidemiol Community Health 1982;36:17-21. [Medline]
  13. Knowelden J, Keeling J, Nicholl JP. A multicentre study of postneonatal mortality. London: HMSO, 1984.
  14. Beal SM. Sudden infant death syndrome: epidemiological comparisons between South Australia and communities with a different incidence. Aust Paediatr J 1986;22(suppl 1):13-6.
  15. Hoffman HJ, Damus K, Hillman L, Krongrad E. Risk factors for SIDS. Results of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development SIDS cooperative epidemiological study. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1988;533:13-30.
  16. McGlashan ND. Sudden infant deaths in Tasmania, 1980-1986: a seven year prospective study. Soc Sci Med 1989;29(8):1015-26.
  17. Ford RPK, Taylor BJ, Mitchell EA, Enright SA, Stewart AW, Becroft DMO, et al. Breastfeeding and the risk of sudden infant death syndrome. Int J Epidemiol 1993;22:885-90. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Dwyer T, Ponsonby ALB, Newman NM, Gibbons LE. Prospective cohort study of prone sleeping position and sudden infant death syndrome. Lancet 1991;337:1244-7. [Medline]
  19. White A, Freeth S, O'Brien M. Infant feeding 1990. London: HMSO, 1992.
  20. Pollock JI. A preliminary analysis of interactions between smoking and infant feeding. In: Poswillo D, Alberman E, eds. Effects of smoking on the fetus, neonate and child. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992:108-20.
  21. Mitchell EA, Aley P, Eastwood J. The national cot death prevention program in New Zealand. Aust J Public Health 1992;16:158-61. [Medline]
  22. Savage F. Breastfeeding and SIDS. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 1992;2:3-5.
  23. Department of Health. Report of the chief medical officer's expert group on the sleeping position of infants and cot death. London: HMSO, 1993.
  24. Fleming PJ, Gilbert RE, Azaz Y, Berry PJ, Rudd PT, Stewart A, Hall E. The interaction between bedding and sleeping position in the sudden infant death syndrome: a population based case-control study. BMJ 1990;301:85-9
  25. Wigfield RE, Fleming PJ, Berry PJ, Rudd PT, Golding J. Can the fall in Avon's sudden infant death rate be explained by changes in sleeping position? BMJ 1992;304:282-3.
  26. Brooks JG, Gilbert RE, Fleming PJ, Berry PJ, Golding J. Postnatal growth preceding sudden infant death syndrome. Pediatrics 1994;94(4):456-61.
  27. Lucas A, Morley R, Cole TJ, Lister G, Leeson-Payne C. Breast milk and subsequent intelligence quotient in children born preterm. Lancet 1992;339:261-4. [Medline]
  28. Lucas A, Cole TJ. Breast milk and neonatal necrotising enterocolitis. Lancet 1990;336:1519-23. [Medline]
  29. Lucas A, Brooke OG, Morley R, Cole TJ, Barnford MF. Early diet of preterm infants and development of allergic or atopic disease:randomised prospective study. BMJ 1990;300:837-40.
  30. Howie PW, Forsyth JS, Ogston SA, Clark A, du V Florey C. Protective effect of breast feeding against infection. BMJ 1990;300:11-6.
  31. Standing Committee on Nutrition of the British Paediatric Association. Is breast feeding beneficial in the UK? Arch Dis Child 1994;71:376-80.
(Accepted 12 December 1994)

Related Articles

Bottle feeding and the sudden infant death syndrome
E A Mitchell, A W Stewart, and R P K Ford
BMJ 1995 311: 122-123. [Extract] [Full Text]

Bottle feeding and the sudden infant death syndrome
D M Tappin
BMJ 1995 310: 1070. [Extract] [Full Text]

Type of formula was not specified
J A Walker-Smith
BMJ 1995 310: 1070. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Mitchell, E A (2007). Recommendations for sudden infant death syndrome prevention: a discussion document. Arch. Dis. Child. 92: 155-159 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, (2005). The Changing Concept of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: Diagnostic Coding Shifts, Controversies Regarding the Sleeping Environment, and New Variables to Consider in Reducing Risk. Pediatrics 116: 1245-1255 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • (2005). . J Hum Lact 21: 289-295 [Abstract]  
  • Horne, R S C, Parslow, P M, Ferens, D, Watts, A-M, Adamson, T M (2004). Comparison of evoked arousability in breast and formula fed infants. Arch. Dis. Child. 89: 22-25 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Goldwater, P N (2003). Sudden infant death syndrome: a critical review of approaches to research. Arch. Dis. Child. 88: 1095-1100 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Goldwater, P. N., Bettelheim, K. A. (2002). CORRESPONDENCE: Curliated Escherichia coli, soluble curlin and the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). J Med Microbiol 51: 1009-1012 [Full text]  
  • Alm, B, Wennergren, G, Norvenius, S G, Skjaerven, R, Lagercrantz, H, Helweg-Larsen, K, Irgens, L M (2002). Breast feeding and the sudden infant death syndrome in Scandinavia, 1992-95. Arch. Dis. Child. 86: 400-402 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Task Force on Infant Sleep Position and Sudden Inf, (2000). Changing Concepts of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: Implications for Infant Sleeping Environment and Sleep Position. Pediatrics 105: 650-656 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • l'Hoir, M P, Engelberts, A C, van Well, G T. J, Westers, P, Mellenbergh, G J, Wolters, W H G, Huber, J (1998). Case-control study of current validity of previously described risk factors for SIDS in the Netherlands. Arch. Dis. Child. 79: 386-393 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hauck, F. R., Kemp;, J. S., Kattwinkel;, J., McKenna, J. J. (1998). Bedsharing Promotes Breastfeeding and AAP Task Force on Infant Positioning and SIDS. Pediatrics 102: 662-664 [Full text]  
  • McKenna, J. J., Mosko, S. S., Richard, C. A. (1997). Bedsharing Promotes Breastfeeding. Pediatrics 100: 214-219 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Fleming, P. J, Blair, P. S, Bacon, C., Bensley, D., Smith, I., Taylor, E., Berry, J., Golding, J., Tripp, J. (1996). Environment of infants during sleep and risk of the sudden infant death syndrome: results of 1993-5 case-control study for confidential inquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy. BMJ 313: 191-195 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Mitchell, E A, Stewart, A W, Ford, R P K (1995). Bottle feeding and the sudden infant death syndrome. BMJ 311: 122c-123 [Full text]  
  • Tappin, D M (1995). Bottle feeding and the sudden infant death syndrome. BMJ 310: 1070b-1070 [Full text]  
  • Walker-Smith, J A (1995). Type of formula was not specified. BMJ 310: 1070c-1070 [Full text]  

Online poll
Find out more

Rapid responses for this article

There are no rapid responses for this article.


Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview