Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
How are we to achieve reductions in the incidence of long term diabetic complications without establishing a standard by which we can compare the glycaemic control of our own diabetic patients with those participating in complications trials? It is well known that standardisation for glycated haemoglobin does not exist, but what we showed was the extent to which the same diabetic patients may have their glycaemic control categorised differently because of this lack of standardisation between assays.
With regard to our statistical analysis, our way of comparing the glycated haemoglobin methods had no relevance to the European classification of patients into good, borderline, or poor control. Likewise patients' concentrations of fetal haemoglobin were not pertinent to our chosen assay by high performance liquid chromatography since fetal haemoglobin was not included in the result for glycated haemoglobin. We read with interest the findings of Hassan and colleagues, which are at odds with those of our study and previous publications.2 3 While there is little doubt that their Glycomat results are analytically correct, their interpretation may be artefactual owing to the inclusion of fetal haemoglobin concentrations in this glycated haemoglobin assay. The random error introduced by fetal haemoglobin is likely to have a greater relative effect on the bias and standard deviation of their reference range population when using haemoglobin A
Eric S Kilpatrick, Alan G Rumley, Marek H Dominiczak, Michael Small
Career registrar Principal biochemist Consultant biochemist Department of Pathological Biochemistry, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow G12 0YN Consultant physician Diabetic Unit, Gartnavel General Hospital.