Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Health Care Evaluation Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health Medicine, Bristol BS8 2PR Correspondence to: Dr Gunnell.
The Health of the Nation white paper set a target for 15% reduction in overall suicide rates by the year 2000. If the targets are to be achieved interventions must be identified which are of proved effectiveness. This paper examines the evidence on the available interventions and points of access to the population at risk. No single intervention has been shown in a well conducted randomised controlled trial to reduce suicide. The greatest potential seems to arise from limiting the availability of methods. In particular it is likely that the introduction of the catalytic convertor will lead to reduced lethality of car exhausts and reductions in suicide using this method. General practitioner education programmes, the effectiveness of lithium and maintenance antidepressants, and limits on the quantity of medicines available over the counter or on prescription should all be evaluated. Particular high risk groups include people recently discharged from psychiatric hospitals and those with a history of parasuicide. Many social processes affect suicide rates and these rather than specific interventions may help or hinder the ability to realise the Health of the Nation targets. Well conducted trials are essential to distinguish complex social processes from the effects of specific interventions for suicide prevention. This review of the available evidence offers little support for the aspiration that the posited targets can be achieved on the basis of current knowledge and current policy.
Suicide is a rare event, but because it occurs among young people it is the third most important contributor to life years lost, after coronary heart disease and cancer. For this reason suicide reduction is included as a key target area in the Health of the Nation strategy.1,2 Suicide reduction appears as the only quantified target in the area of psychiatric illness, where the overall purpose is to "reduce ill health and death caused by mental illness." Reversal of the rising trends in suicide and attempted suicide in Europe is one of the World Health Organisation's targets for Europe as part of its Health for All strategy. Worldwide trends in the epidemiology of suicide and parasuicide have recently been reviewed.3 This priority attention to one of the rarest, though more important, outcomes of psychiatric illness could be seen as an acknowledgement of Durkheim's seminal interpretation of suicide as a sentinel event that reflects wider aspects of mental and social well being.4
Targets help highlight areas of strategy, identify explicit purposes, and provide benchmarks for monitoring progress in the selected areas.5 They therefore identify aspirations, but they must be based on evidence to avoid possibly erroneous service activity that could be better deployed in other ways. The targets have therefore stimulated some debate over the ability to affect suicide rates and the appropriate setting for interventions.*RF 6-9* We consider the available evidence concerning the effectiveness of measures designed to prevent suicide, and we relate that evidence to the potential exposure of the at risk population to each intervention in order to reconstruct the possible impact of current programmes. This paper reviews the evidence concerning interventions, suggests some priorities for intervention, and emphasises the essential requirements that such interventions must be introduced with competent evaluation if we are to be any better informed in the future about this critical area.
Epidemiology of suicide in England and Wales
Table I lists some of the recognised groups at increased risk of suicide (these groups are not mutually exclusive). Where possible, figures from research based in Britain have been used and figures for increased risk derived from population based studies. Demographic factors are also important; suicide risk is increased in men and in people who are separated, single, or divorced.10,11 Of particular recent interest has been the dramatic increase in the rate of suicide in young men.12 The overall rate of suicide remains highest in men aged 75 and over, although in terms of absolute numbers more deaths occur in the younger age groups. From the table it is apparent that many suicides do not belong to any defined high risk group. Psychiatric patients are treated as a whole, rather than by particular diagnostic group. Suicide risk in psychiatric patients and aspects of care that may influence this risk have recently been reviewed.13
TABLE I - Groups at recognised increased risk of suicide
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Setting of research
showing increased Estimated magnitude % of total suicides in Reference
Group risk of increased risk England and Wales numbers
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current or former psychiatric United Kingdom; x10 50 13-16
patients (inpatient or United States
outpatients)
Current or recent (6-12 United Kingdom 25 14, 17
months) contact with
psychiatric service
Patients in four weeks after United Kingdom Men x 200 10-15 18
discharge from psychiatric Women x 100
hospitals
History of parasuicide United Kingdom x 10-30 30-47 14, 19-21
Alcoholics United Kingdom; x 20 15-25 14, 22, 23
United States;
Sweden
Drug misusers United Kingdom x 20 24
Family history of suicide United Kingdom 4 14
Serious physical illness or United Kingdom; 4-32 19, 25-28
handicap (epilepsy, United States
Huntington's, cancer,
tinnitus)
HIV or AIDS United Kingdom; HIV:denominator 1-2 29, 30
United States unknown
AIDS; x 36
Prisoners United Kingdom x 5 <1 11, 31
Occupational groupings with United Kingdom x 2 1 11
10 highest standardised
mortality ratios
Doctors United Kingdom x 2 <0.1 11
Farmers United Kingdom x 2 <1 11
Unemployed United Kingdom x 2 6 11, 32
Young women (15-34) from United Kingdom x 2.7 <0.1 33, 34
Indian subcontinent
Samaritan clients United Kingdom x 20 4-7 17, 19 |
Methods
of literature review
A search of the medical literature with Medline and Psycinfo databases was used to identify all English language papers or abstracts listed under the heading suicide prevention and control and published since 1975. Searches using the British Library's BLAISE-line database were also undertaken with the heading suicide prevention. The main psychiatric journals held in local medical school and psychiatric unit libraires were systematically hand searched for recent articles on this subject. References cited in these articles whose title suggested a trial or initiative undertaken with the intention of preventing suicide were also obtained.
Suicide prevention: evidence from the literature
Two forms of evidence exist concerning the potential for reducing the incidence of suicide: research evidence based on the evaluation of specific interventions on suicide rates and accounts of the influence of potentially modifiable factors on suicide rates, in which the particular interventions have not been formally evaluated. The specific interventions that have been evaluated in terms of their effect on suicide rates are shown in table II. Only two of these have been evaluated in randomised controlled trials and the methodology used to assess these interventions described contains potential biases.35,36
TABLE II - Interventions aimed at reducing suicide, evaluated in terms of
suicide reduction achieved
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intervention Study design
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Educational programmes for general practitioners on Non-randomised controlled study using historical and
the diagnosis and treatment of depression37,38 geographically distant controls
Drug treatment and electroconvulsive therapy*RF 39-42* Non-randomised comparison of cohorts of patients
taking and not taking lithium as maintenance for
affective disorder
Retrospective note reviews of psychiatric deaths
Samaritans and suicide prevention centres*RF 43-46* Geographic comparisons of suicide rates in towns and
cities with and without these resources
Increased support to identified high risk group of callers Randomised controlled trial with 18 months' follow up
to suicide prevention centre35
Group treatment of depressed and suicidal people*RF 35a* Non-randomised controlled trial of six treatment
modalities
Postdischarge contacts with former psychiatric Randomised controlled trial with 4 years' follow up
inpatients who default from follow up36
Media restrictions on reporting of suicide47 Historical comparison of changes in suicide rates
Legislative restrictions of the availability of drugs Historical comparison of changes in suicide rates
(barbiturates)48
Screening of prisoners for suicide risk; suicide Non-randomised intervention assessed by telephone
prevention programme in prisons31,49,50 survey
Historical comparison of changes in suicides rates
School based suicide prevention programme*RF 51-55* Controlled trials of suicide prevention programme
Geographic comparison of suicide rates in areas with
and without specific intervention programmes
Historical comparison of changes in suicide rates
Safety measures on high buildings56 Historical comparison of changes in method and site
specific rates |
Primary care settings
The effectiveness of educating general practitioners in the diagnosis and treatment of depression was assessed on the Swedish island of Gotland (population 56 000). Two educational programmes of two days, attended by most of the island's general practitioners, took place.*RF 37,38,57-59* Suicide rates and other measures of psychiatric morbidity were reduced in the year after this intervention. Two years after the programme, suicide rates rose again. The short term reduction may have been the result of random fluctuation of suicide levels in a small population. Suicide rates on the Swedish mainland and rates on the island before the intervention were used for comparison. The authors are currently examining the characteristics of those committing suicide on the island between 1981-92 and their contacts with health services; these analyses will give additional evidence of the programme's effect (W Rutz, personnal communication). The island's geographic and cultural differences from the United Kingdom make transposition of the findings unreliable. Evidence in Britain suggests that only half of patients with major depression are recognised by general practitioners.60,61
There is some evidence that tricyclic antidepressants are sometimes prescribed for inappropriate indications.62 These patients, and indeed all those prescribed antidepressants, are paradoxically given a powerful potential means to commit suicide. Recent overviews have found that cognitive therapy is effective in some patients with depression, and such non-pharmacological interventions should always be considered.63 Other drugs (for example, combinations of dextropropoxyphene and paracetamol) account for sizable proportions of overdose. More careful prescribing of smaller quantities of these drugs may be beneficial.
Secondary care settings
Screening of patients to identify those at greatest risk of suicide, treatment of suicidal patients, and multidisciplinary audit of suicides are important in secondary care settings.
Screening tools to predict those at increased risk of suicide have been advocated by some, but such tools have not been found useful in unselected groups of young men64,65 and high risk groups.66,67 One review suggested that screening and crisis intervention introduced in the prison service in New York state may have been successful: fewer suicides occurred the year after the programme was introduced, but controls were not used and long term effects have not be published.49 The introduction of screening and management plans for those at increased risk of suicide in prisons in England and Wales in 1987 did not lead to a reduction in suicides.31 Biochemical screening has been advocated as an alternative or complementary strategy to identify high risk groups. Low concentrations of 5-hydroxy-tryptamine and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid have been found to be related to suicidal and aggressive behaviour,*RF 68-71* but no evidence currently exists as to their usefulness as adjuncts to other screening tools.
Another high risk group coming into medical contact are those who deliberately harm themselves. Of successful suicides, 30-47% have a history of previous deliberate self harm.14,19,21 In the year after parasuicide 1% of individuals suceed in killing themselves; 3-10% may do so eventually.14,19,20,72,73 Attempts to reduce repetition of deliberate self harm and eventual suicide have been largely unsuccessful,*RF 74-78* although four small randomised controlled trials suggest that in some subgroups of patients episodes of repetition may be preventable.*RF 79-82* All the trials were too small to examine the effect of these treatments on suicide rates, and long term impact was not examined.
Treatment with lithium is known to be effective in preventing episodes of recurrent mood disorder.83,84 Long term lithium has also been found to reduce the risk of suicide among those attending lithium clinics compared with matched patients with similar diagnoses not attending such clinics.39,40 Such compliant patients may differ from those who do not take the drug. Clinic attendance per se may be beneficial, rather than an effect of the prescribed medicine. One recent placebo controlled trial of prophylactic antidepressant therapy in the year after successful treatment of depression showed a significant increase in suicide attempts and a non- significant rise in suicide in those receiving maintenance treatment.85 Paradoxical emergence of suicidal behavior and ideation in patients taking antidepressants has recently been reviewed.86 The risk of such occurrences was felt to be small, but clinicians were reminded to be aware of this risk and warn patients to seek help should this occur.
Reviews of case notes of psychiatric patients who committed suicide in Denmark and the United States failed to find any convincing evidence of the effectiveness of lithium, antidepressants, or electroconvulsive therapy in reducing long term suicide risk.41,42 One American study has examined the benefits of specific group therapy targeted at the suicidal and depressed.*RF 35a* In this non-randomised trial 720 people allocated to six different treatments were followed up for 30 months. Although suicide rate in the "experimental group" was lower, this may have been as a result of the non-random nature of the trial. Lester, in a recent review of the prevention of suicide, conceded that "the effectiveness of individual psychiatric and psychotherapeutic treatment remains unproven for suicide prevention."87 Adequately controlled, randomised prospective studies are required to examine the impact of these treatments on suicide.
Research in Hungary, which has the world's highest suicide rate, suggests an inverse relation between regional suicide rates and rates of inpatient and outpatient treatment for depression. Methodological problems may account for the observed differences: factors associated with high rates of suicide may also be associated with reduced access to specialist treatment; the reported rates of incident depression are low; and there may be regional differences in methods of collecting and the completeness of the data.88
The medical management of those with psychiatric illness has been carefully examined. A quarter of those committing suicide are under current or recent psychiatric care, and 40% of suicides make contact with their general practitioner in the month before death.*RF 89-91* In an audit of suicide deaths among psychiatric patients in Bristol, in three quarters of cases the seriousness of risk had not been fully recognised.92 Local multidisciplinary audit is recommended in the key area handbook for mental illness,2 and Krieger has described some of the common errors in the treatment of suicidal patients.93 The medical management of patients following overdose is also important. A national confidential inquiry into suicide and homicide by psychiatric patients is currently being developed by the Department of Health, and it is hoped that such initiatives will highlight consistent areas of poor practice and lead to improvements.
Public health measures
The difficulty in defining suitable control populations and the possibility that the changes that lead to the introduction of interventions may themselves be responsible for some of the observed effects that are difficult to overcome. Many have attempted to evaluate the effect of the Samaritans, suicide prevention centres, and school based programmes.*RF 43,44-46,51,53,94,95* On balance the evidence suggests that these interventions make little impact on suicide rates, although some interventions may have deleterious effects51,96 and others may be beneficial to small subsets (young white women) of the population at risk.45 Lester compared the suicide rate in youth for each state in the United States. Although significant increases in youth suicide rates were found in those states in which a greater proportion of adolescents were involved in specific school programmes, rates were lower in states that had developed multifaceted suicide prevention programmes. Such studies, using multiple sources of information on activities undertaken in a non-randomised manner, contain potential biases.51 They are, however, sometimes the best means available to examine the impact of a population based intervention for such a rare outcome.
One randomised controlled trial of increased support to identified subgroups of high risk callers to a suicide prevention centre in Los Angeles failed to show any reduction in suicide, but only 400 individuals were included in the trial.35 Another randomised controlled trial examined the effect of making regular contacts with groups of high risk former psychiatric patients who did not adhere to follow up programmes. Full follow up of all subjects was not achieved, and methods of randomisation were not fully described. Analysis on an intention to treat basis found no significant differences between those randomised to regular contact (12 suicides after four years, 3% of those in the contact group) and those in the no contact group (20 suicides after four years, 4% of those in this group).36 In Australia, legislative restrictions on the availability of barbiturates were associated with a short term reduction in method specific and all cause suicide rates,48 although again the absence of control groups means that this can be regarded as suggestive evidence only.
Interventions in settings such as schools and prisons have in some instances been followed by reduced suicide. These reductions may have been influenced by other factors, and previously high rates of suicide preceding these interventions may have been clusters or chance occurrences.55,97,98 Smialek and Spitz reported that use of video surveillance cameras in the jails of one county in the United States has prevented at least 12 suicides.99 Interventions aimed at reducing access to particular methods may lead to reductions in method specific or site specific rates but not to overall reduction in suicide rates.56
Restrictions on media reporting of suicides occurring on the Viennese underground system led to a reduction in the number who used this method to commit suicide, although the effects on all cause suicide rates would be impossible to determine given the small numbers using this method.47 There is other evidence, however, that depiction of suicide in the media may lead to increases in method specific and all cause suicide rates.100 Some guidelines on the reporting of suicide in the media currently exist in the United Kingdom.101 The role of fictional portrayal and news reporting of suicide has been much debated.*RF 4,100,102-107*
In the US, after several well publicised clusters of suicide, the Centers for Disease Control developed a series of recommendations for a community plan for the prevention and containment of such clusters.108 The effectiveness of these interventions on population suicide rates would be difficult to assess. Lester suggested that public education campaigns could highlight the less glamorous side of suicide (such as liver failure after paracetamol overdose and severe injury due to failed suicide using firearms). He drew parallels to public education campaigns on the risks of smoking.87
There is some evidence that the availability of particular methods of suicide influences both the method specific and all cause suicide rates.*RF 48,109-115* This evidence has been summarised by Clarke and Lester.116 It has been estimated, for example, that 6700 lives were saved with the detoxification of domestic gas in the 1960s.117 Contrary to this, the substitution hypothesis argues that, although the restriction of the availability of one method of suicide reduces method specific rates, compensatory increases occur in suicides with other methods.118 It is not possible to disentangle the two hypotheses, and prospective randomised controlled trials are neither possible nor ethical. If restriction of the availability of methods were effective the following measures may be beneficial: improved prescribing, limiting the dose of antidepressant in a single tablet and use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors*RF 63,119-124*; controls on over the counter medicines - for example, limiting the quantity of paracetamol available at a single purchase125,126; addition of methionine to paracetamol to limit its toxicity in overdose; safety measures on underground railway systems127,128; safety measures at suicide "hotspots" such as Beachy Head and the Golden Gate Bridge*RF 56,87,129-132*; redesign of commonly used appliances - for example, car exhaust outlets, plastic bags; and stricter licensing and restricted availability of firearms.110,112,113 Such restrictions exploit the ambivalence felt by many would be suicides; if sufficient time is gained by making a method less accessible, the suicidal impulse may subside.
Points of access to suicidal people
Information in this section includes that on those who deliberately self harm. Although this group has different characteristics, it provides some insight into the patterns of behaviour of completed suicides.133 Recent research suggests that 20-25% of those committing suicide have contact with a health care professional (most usually the general practitioner) in the week before death, and 40% have such contact in the month before death.*RF 89-91* Twenty years ago two thirds of suicide victims made contact in the month before suicide.19,37 Such changes may reflect methodological differences within the studies, differences in the setting of the study, or the facts that suicide in young men has increased greatly in the 20 years since the first studies and that young men on the whole make less use of primary care services. The average general practitioner will experience the suicide of a patient every four or five years and have contact with such a patient shortly before suicide only every eight or 10 years.
About half of those committing suicide have at some time had contact with psychiatric services, yet only a quarter have had current or recent contact.14,19,89 Goldacre has recently shown the greatly increased risk of suicide in psychiatric patients shortly after discharge from in patient care.18 Predictive risk factors in this population need to be described and reasons for this increased risk explored. Clearer discharge plans and dealing with unresolved social problems before discharge may be beneficial.
Contacts with other agencies before suicide have not been documented in such detail. Four to seven per cent of suicides have had past, although not necessarily recent, contact with the Samaritans.17,19 In a study in Oxford of those who had deliberately self harmed, 75% had heard of the Samaritans but only 4% contacted them in the week before their action. Social workers were contacted by 10% and clergy by 13% in the week before parasuicide.134 Similar findings have been reported elsewhere.135
Schoolteachers are in regular contact with a population whose suicide risk has increased in recent years, and training programs targeted at teachers have been evaluated in Holland.136 Psychological autopsy studies suggest that 30-55% of suicides intimate their planned actions to others.14,19 There is a popular misconception that those who talk about suicide do not complete the act. A study of those who deliberately self harm found that over 50% have an available close confidant but this did not prevent their action.134
The composite picture
Table III summarises the possible strategies and the potential reduction in suicide should these be adopted. It gives estimates for the range of possible reductions achievable by pursuing particular measures, but it is important to emphasise the limits to the evidence in relation to such interventions. Some of the estimated reductions in suicides are based on the assumption (unproved) that 25-30% of those who fail to commit suicide with one method will not revert to other methods. Table III also assumes that the current proportions of individuals using a particular method will remain static. As numbers using particular methods change due to changes in the availability of, for example, toxic car exhaust fumes,137 other methods may gain in popularity after a time. In effect we are firing at a moving target, and methods commonly used for suicide need to be regularly reviewed and interventions evaluated.11 The quality of the available evidence has been classified formally in the table but interpreted in an optimistic light. The costs of each of these interventions, none of which is of proved efficacy, must be considered against investment in interventions in other areas where effectiveness is known.
TABLE III - Effects of and exposure to possible suicide prevention strategies
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated reduction Quality of
Setting and intervention Exposure to intervention in total suicides (%) evidence*
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary health care
GP education and guidelines 25% of all suicides consult in week before, Uncertain(dagger) II/III
on the treatment of 40% in month before suicide. (GP sees
depression patient in week before suicide once every
8 years.) GPs fail to recognise 50% of
cases of severe depression.
Improved prescribing; 9 million antidepressant prescriptions 4(double dagger) III
selective serotonin per year
reuptake inhibitors
Secondary health care
Screening questionnaires Whole population, potentially 0 II
Increased care around time of 10-15% suicides 2-3(double dagger) III
discharge
Multidisciplinary audit (GP Those presenting to psychiatrist and GPs Uncertain(???) III
and psychiatric) before suicide
Improved access (contact Prevalence of suicidal ideation 1-3% of Uncertain III
telephone numbers, population per year138
regular review, etc)
provision of alcohol and drug 28% men and 11% women drink above Uncertain III
service recommended levels; 15-25% of those
committing suicide have a history of
alcoholism
Attempts to maintain contact Former psychiatric patients Uncertain III/IV
with those defaulting from
follow up
Public health measures
Health promotion:
Encourage exercise Whole population Uncertain III/IV
Sensible drinking Whole population Uncertain III/IV
Stress management Whole population Uncertain III/IV
Suicide hotspots:
Improved safety measures All those who are actively suicidal (5% of 1-2(double dagger) III
suicides are by jumping; 70% of these
jump from manmade structures)
Design of underground <1 III
transport
The media:
Reinforcement of reporting Whole population
guidelines 1(double dagger) III
Reinforcement of Whole population
guidelines on fictional
portrayal of suicide and
parasuicide
Government and industry:
Strategies to reduce 6% of working population unemployed 1-2(double dagger) III
unemployment (1991)
Alcohol taxation Whole population Uncertain III
Durg availability and Actively suicidal people (1-3% of 2(double dagger) III
packaging legislation population/year)138
Car exhaust design and Actively suicidal people (1-3% of 7(???) III
catalytic converters population/year)138
Plastic bag disign Actively suicidal people (1-3% of <1(double dagger) III
population/year)138
Firearm availability Actively suicidal people with access to guns 1(double dagger) III
(3% of suicides)
Professional bodies and voluntary agencies:
Counselling and Support High risk professional groups (1%) and 1(parallel to) IV
(Samaritans, Cruse, actively suicidal people
National Farmers Union,
CAB, Relate, prison
support groups, etc)
Increased outreach support High risk callers to Samaritans 0 III/IV
to identified high risk
callers
School bassed programme Children of school age 0 III/IV
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(dagger)Gotland studies suggest that 1 20-48% reduction may be achieved; these
figures are for the year following the education program and were obtained for
an island population cared for under Swedish health care system. Not
comparable to British setting; findings inconclusive.
(double dagger)Estimate based on information available to proportion of
suicides in a high risk group or proportion using a particular method,
assuming alternative methods not used by 25-30.
(???)Car exhaust gases used in 22% of suicides; if one third of these
individuals did not use another method. 7% reduction would result. This will
the transition to catalyte convertors.137
(parallel to)Estimate based on findings of age sex specific reduction in
suicide in areas covered hy suicide prevention cnetres in United States.
(???)Bristol Confidential Inquiry92 found seriousness of suicide risk not
fully appreciated in 75% of suicides by inpatinets and recent inpatients.
*Quality of evidence (US Preventive Task Force classification): I Evidence
obtained from at least one properly designed randomised controlled trial
II-I Evidence obtained from well designed controlled trials without
randomisation II-2 Evidence obtained from well designed cohort or case-control
analytic studies, preferably from more than one centre or research group II-3
Evidence obtained from multiple time series with or without intervention. Dramatic
results from uncontrolled experiments (such as the results of the introduction
of penicillin in the 1940s) could be regarded as this type of evidence III
Opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience; descriptive
studies; reports of expert committees IV Evidence inadequate owing to problems
of methodology (sample size; length or comprechensives of follow up; conflicts
of evidence) |
Inevitably, many of those who commit suicide are suffering from longstanding mental or physical distress and for them life has become unbearable. For others suicide occurs as a result of a crisis either as a result of relationship breakdown or financial difficulties in the context of a vulnerable personality type. Suicide offers an escape from an intolerable, although probably transient, period of emotional turmoil. If appropriate help and protection can be offered during this period suicide may be prevented.
Target groups
There is no single, readily identifiable, high risk population that constitues a sizeable proportion of overall suicides and yet represents a small, easily targeted group. Those recently discharged from psychiatric care, those with a past history of parasuicide, and young men are the most readily defined groups. The prevention paradox, whereby there is disadvantage to the many from interventions that can benefit only the few, is important in a condition as common as ischaemic heart disease.139 The concern must be all the greater where the outcome to be prevented is as rare as suicide. It is likely that environmental changes, in particular the introduction of legislation on car exhaust gas, will have the greatest chance of producing reductions (this method currently accounts for a fifth of all suicides).
The target of 15% reduction in suicides is not based on the assumption that effective interventions exist but are underused, for no such evidence exists. It is clear from this analysis that only a combination of measures can be expected to achieve the targeted 15% reduction in suicide rate. The clearest problem area is young men; a specific target for this age group might have sharpened the focus on them. Currently this is the group with whom the health service has least contact and least information to explain the rise in suicide among their number.
It is essential to acknowledge that within a literature that contains numerous assertions and projections, no specific medical intervention has been shown to affect suicide rates. Thus it is essential that possible strategies are fully evaluated. Difficulties with such evaluations abound, particularly stemming from the multicausal nature of suicide,140 the difficulty of avoiding contamination, and the rarity of the outcome. Thus large sample sizes are required to prospectively evaluate interventions in particular settings (see table IV).
TABLE IV - Estimated sample sizes (80% power, two sided 5% significance level)
required for the evaluation of interventions targeted at particular population
groups. Studies are unmatched, with equal numbers in intervention and control
groups (EPISTAT package used)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proportion committing %Reduction in Total sample size
Population studied suicide suicide required
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
General population, England 0.01% per year 15 12 909 670
and Wales
Patients after parasuicide20 2.8% 15 44 914
In subsequent eight years 50 3 292
Patients after discharge from 0.9% 15 142 258
psychiatric hospitals18 In subsequent year 50 10 396 |
Interventions and outcomes
Among the interventions most amenable to adequate evaluation are strategies to reduce suicide among those recently discharged from psychiatric care, the effectiveness of general practitioners' postgraduate education, the effectiveness of limiting quantities of over the counter medicines and prescription quantities of particularly toxic drugs, and the effectiveness of long term prophylaxis with lithium or antidepressants. The following pragmatic suggestions for research and practice seem most amenable to the British context: strategies for reducing suicide in those recently discharged from psychiatric care; educating general practitioners on recognition and treatment of depression and highlighting the drugs most often taken in fatal overdoses; guidelines on the appropriate management and treatment of depression; schemes to limit the size of individual prescriptions and dose per tablet of high risk drugs; limitation of quantity and packaging of paracetamol and aspirin; reinforcement of media guidelines on the reporting and showing of fictionalised suicide; audit of suicide and parasuicide; and modification of car exhaust design.
Controlled clinical trials must be used where possible, although the sample sizes required to demonstrate the effectiveness of population based interventions, targeted at such a rare event, are very large.141 Other forms of properly conducted evaluation may be appropriate where experimental methods are not possible. Whatever the effectiveness of the interventions, it seems that access to the suicidal population has declined as the age and sex structure of the suicidal population has changed in recent years with the increases in suicides in young men.10,12 Here Durkheim's interpretation, a century ago, that social processes concerning levels of integration and social values are responsible for trends in such individual and isolated acts, informs a different set of research and policy approaches. To understand the problems of rising suicide in youth, research must address the experience of the young men in Britain, and treatment must address aspects of economic and social policy at a national level.
We thank Professor H G Morgan, University of Bristol, and Dr K Hawton, University of Oxford and Royal College of Psychiatrists, for advice on the available literature, and Dr T Peters for statistical advice.
Read all Rapid Responses