BMJ 1994;308:945-948 (9 April)

Papers

Incidence and recognition of malnutrition in hospital

J P McWhirter, C R Pennington 

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY Correspondence to: Mrs McWhirter.

Abstract

Objectives : To determine incidence of malnutrition among patients on admission to hospital, to monitor their changes in nutritional status during stay, and to determine awareness of nutrition in different clinical units.
Design : Prospective study of consecutive admissions.
Setting : Acute teaching hospital.
Subjects : 500 patients admitted to hospital: 100 each from general surgery, general medicine, respiratory medicine, orthopaedic surgery, and medicine for the elderly.
Main outcome measures : Nutritional status of patients on admission and reassessment on discharge, review of case notes for information about nutritional status.
Results : On admission, 200 of the 500 patients were undernourished (body mass index less than 20) and 34% were overweight (body mass index >25). The 112 patients reassessed on discharge had mean weight loss of 5.4% with greatest weight loss in those initially most undernourished. But the 10 patients referred for nutritional support showed mean weight gain of 7.9%. Review of case notes revealed that, of the 200 undernourished patients, only 96 had any nutritional information documented.
Conclusion : Malnutrition remains a largely unrecognised problem in hospital and highlights the need for education on clinical nutrition.

Clinical implications

  • Clinical implications

  • High incidence of protein energy malnutrition in hospital patients was first shown more than 15 years ago

  • Poor nutritional status adversely affects health and recovery from illness or injury

  • In this study 40% of patients were undernourished on admission to hospital and two thirds of all patients lost weight during hospital stay

  • Only a few patients were given nutritional support, but most of these showed improved nutritional status

  • Continued lack of awareness of importance of clinical nutrition suggests need for education on this subject

Introduction

More than 15 years have passed since the high incidence of protein energy malnutrition in medical and surgical patients was first shown,*RF 1-3* and adverse changes in nutritional status during hospitalisation have also been reported.4 Nutritional status has been shown to have important effects on health in recovery from illness or injury. Experimental semistarvation of normal volunteers that caused a 25% loss of body weight (to a body mass index of 17.5) was associated with apathy, depression, fatigue, and loss of will to recover.5 Consequent loss of muscle power affects respiratory function, increasing susceptibility to chest infection,6 and reduces cardiac function.7 Impaired immune function increases the risk of infection.8 Inevitably, such complications result in increased morbidity and mortality and lengthened stay in hospital,9 at substantial extra cost in health care.10

Despite such findings, we believe that the problem of malnutrition in hospital remains largely unrecognised. The nutritional screening of patients at risk of depletion is not routine in many areas. In this study we sought to determine the incidence of nutritional depletion in patients admitted to hospital, to monitor changes in nutritional status during hospitalisation, to determine awareness of nutrition in different clinical units, and to assess the effect of nutritional intervention in relation to nutritional parameters.

Patients and methods

One of us (JPM) assessed the nutritional status of 500 patients on their admission to Dundee Teaching Hospitals Unit: 100 consecutive admissions from each of five disciplines - general surgery, general medicine, respiratory medicine, orthopaedic surgery, and medicine for the elderly. Patients admitted as day cases were not included in the study. Table I shows details of the patients studied. This study was approved by Tayside Health Board ethics committee.


TABLE I - Details of 500 patients admitted to hospital in five specialties.
Values are numbers
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      Elective     Non-elective
Condition                            procedures     procedures     Total
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
General surgery:                       53             47           100
 Major abdominal surgery                 14             11            25
 Oesophageal surgery                      4              2             6
 Minor surgical procedures               10              7            17
 Other major surgery                     16              2            18
 Vascular surgery                         8              6            14
 Surgical emphysema                       0              1             1
 Renal colic                              0              2             2
 Pancreatic disease                       0              4             4
 Abdominal pain                           1             12            13
General medicine:                      47             53           100
 Ischaemic heart disease                  8             21            29
 Malignant disease                       11              2            13
 Neurological disorders                   3              9            12
 Inflammatory bowel disease               9              4            13
 Other gastrointestinal disorders         7              4            11
 Diabetes mellitus                        0              3             3
 Vascular disease                         5              5            10
 Protein energy malnutrition              1              2             3
 Investigation of weight loss             2              0             2
 Renal failure                            1              3             4
Respiratory medicine:                  38             62           100
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease    6             32            38
 Asthma                                   7             11            18
 Malignant disease                       12              0            12
 Tuberculosis                             3              0             3
 Trauma                                   0              3             3
 Other respiratory disease               10             16            26
Orthopaedic surgery:                   43             57           100
 Metastatic bone disease                  6              0             6
 Trauma fractures                         0             47            47
 Joint replacements                      19              0            19
 Minor surgical procedures               18             10            28
Medicine for the elderly:              18             82           100
 Respite care                            18              0            18
 Neurological disorders                   0             15            15
 Respiratory symptoms                     0             14            14
 Malignant disease                        0              4             4
 Gastrointestinal disorders               0              5             5
 Renal disease                            0              2             2
 Investigation of weight loss             0              1             1
 Ischaemic heart disease                  0             15            15
 Other acute illness                      0             26            26

Each patient's nutritional status was determined from anthropometric data - body mass index, triceps skinfold thickness, mid-arm circumference, mid-arm muscle circumference, and weight loss before illness. Body mass index by itself is not a sensitive indicator of protein energy malnutrition as it does not distinguish between depletion of fat or muscle. Low body mass index measurements will also include some patients who normally weigh less than is usual for their height. It is therefore useful to include other measurements of fat and muscle stores. Measurement of triceps skinfold thickness provides an estimate of body fat reserves. Mid-arm muscle circumference is a useful measure of muscle protein stores. Unintentional weight loss before illness was a dynamic measure of nutritional status to identify patients at risk of complications as a result of getting thinner. (It is important, however to treat data from patient recall with caution.) To determine changes in nutritional status during hospital stay, patients who were hospitalised for more than one week were reassessed on discharge.

Height was recorded from case notes where available or measured with a Harpenden pocket stadiometer. When height was difficult to measure (for example, in elderly patients) stature was calculated from knee height. Weight was measured with either mechanical chair scales or Seca bathroom scales. Height and weight were used to determine body mass index (weight (kg)/(height (m))2). Mid-arm circumference (cm) was measured with a tape measure, and triceps skinfold thickness (mm) was measured by the accepted method with Harpenden skinfold callipers; these were used to calculate mid-arm muscle circumference (mid-arm muscle circumference (cm)=mid-arm circumference-triceps skinfold thicknessx0.314). Values were compared with those in tables of normal values for triceps skinfold thickness and mid-arm muscle circumference measurements standardised for sex and age (for ages of 16 to 64 years), drawn from published data on the population of the United States.11,12 Tables drawn from data on the elderly population in the United Kingdom were also used. The study data for body mass index and mid-arm circumference were also compared with data for these parameters in the British population that have been published.13 Weight loss before illness was determined either by recalled weight or from earlier weights recorded at outpatient visits. Functional status was measured with a Harpenden hand grip dynamometer: patients were asked to grip the dynamometer three times with their non-dominant hand, and the highest reading was recorded. These values were compared with tables standardised for age and sex.14

Patients were considered to be mildly undernourished if their body mass index was less than 20 and if their triceps skinfold thickness or mid-arm muscle circumference was below the 15th centile. A body mass index of less than 18 and a triceps skinfold thickness or mid-arm muscle circumference below the fifth centile were evidence of moderate undernutrition, and a body mass index of less than 16 and a triceps skinfold thickness or mid-arm muscle circumference below the fifth centile were evidence of severe undernutrition. Unintentional weight loss before illness of more than 10% in the six months before admission was considered as additional evidence of undernutrition. Values for grip strength below 85% of standard may be evidence of protein depletion but in this study were not used in determining malnutrition. Patients were classified as overweight if they had a body mass index of more than 25 on admission.15

Case notes were reviewed for any information relating to nutritional status at the outpatient visit before admission and on admission to hospital. A checklist of expected references to nutrition was used for data collection, and any other nutritional information was also noted. This information revealed the attitudes of medical staff to nutrition and whether nutritional intervention may have been indicated before elective admission to hospital.

All data were entered into the computer system (Clinical Retrieval and Follow up Template) that was adapted for this study.16 Statistical analysis was carried out with the SPSS package: Wilcoxon's paired t test was used to analyse weight changes in matched pairs; Fisher's test of exact probability was used to analyse associations between patients losing weight and those gaining weight; and X2 was used to analyse differences between the study data for body mass index and mid-arm circumference and data for the general population.

Results

Measurements on admission

Of the 500 patients, 67 (13%) had a body mass index of 18-20, 73 (14%) had a body mass index of 16-18, and 47 (9%) had a body mass index below 16. Table II shows that, of the patients aged between 16 and 64, 23% of the men and 28% of the women had a body mass index below 20, significantly different from the 6% of men and 12% of women in the general population (P<0.001). Within the same age group, 22% of the men and 31% of the women in the study group had a mid-arm circumference of less than 25 cm, significantly higher than the 3% and 14% of men and women respectively in the general population (P<0.001) (table III).


TABLE II - Distribution of body mass index in people aged 16-64: 225
patients admitted to hospital and representative sample of British
population. Values are numbers (percentages)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Men                       Women

                                  General                    General
Body mass index    Patients     population     Patients    population
(kg/m2)      (n=134)       (n=1156)*      (n=91)      (n=1159)*
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
<20                31 (23)        69 (6)       26 (29)      139 (12)
20.1-25            50 (37)       567 (49)      30 (33)      603 (52)
25.1-30            45 (34)       428 (37)      16 (18)      278 (24)
>30                 8 (6)         92 (8)       19 (21)      139 (12)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
*Data from Gregory et al.13


TABLE III - Distribution of mid-arm circumference in people aged
16-64: 224 patients admitted to hospital and representative sample
of British population. Values are numbers (percentages)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
                              Men                      Women

                                  General                  General
Mid-arm               Patients   population    Patients   population
circumference (cm)    (n=134)     (n=1191)*     (n=90)     (n=1187)*
----------------------------------------------------------------------
<25                   29 (22)      36 (3)       28 (31)    167 (14)
25.1-27.5             35 (26)     167 (14)      17 (19)    320 (27)
27.6-30               19 (14)     333 (28)      17 (19)    320 (27)
30.1-32.5             27 (20)     369 (31)       8 (9)     202 (17)
>32.5                 24 (18)     286 (24)      20 (22)    178 (15)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 *Data from Gregory et al.13

Altogether, 140 (28%) of the 500 patients had a triceps skinfold thickness between the fifth and 15th centile, and 88 (18%) had a triceps skinfold thickness below the fifth centile. Two hundred (40%) of the patients had a mid-arm muscle circumference value between the fifth and 15th centile and 177 (35%) had a mid-arm muscle circumference below the fifth centile. A weight loss of more than 10% in the six months before admission to hospital was recorded for 66 (13%) of the patients.

The grip strength of 420 patients was measured (36 patients were too ill or confused to perform the test). Values of below 85% of standard were recorded for 283 patients, of whom 134 (47%) were undernourished, while 137 patients had grip strengths of 85% or more of standard, of whom 19 (14%) were undernourished.

Nutritional status on admission

Table IV shows that 129 of the 500 patients were normally nourished on admission to hospital, 171 were overweight, and 200 were undernourished. Under-nutrition was evident in 27 of the general surgery patients, 46 of the general medical patients, 45 of the patients in respiratory medicine, 39 of the orthopaedic surgery patients, and 43 of the patients in the assessment units for medicine for the elderly. Of those 200 undernourished patients, 66 were considered to have mild protein energy depletion, 87 were moderately depleted, and 47 were severely depleted. Table V shows the prevalence of protein energy malnutrition in the different groups of patients.


TABLE IV - Nutritional status of 500 patients at time of admission to one of
five hospital specialties. Values are numbers
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Hospital specialty

                      General     General     Respiratory   Orthopaedic    Medicine for
                      surgery     medicine     medicine       surgery        elderly
                      (n=100)     (n=100)       (n=100)       (n=100)        (n=100)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Undernourished          27          46            45             39             43
Normal                  25          30            17             30             27
Overweight              48          24            38             31             30


TABLE V - Prevalence of protein energy malnutrition among 500 patients admitted to five hospital specialties.
Values are numbers
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Hospital specialty

                      General     General     Respiratory    Orthopaedic   Medicine for
                      surgery     medicine      medicine       surgery       elderly
Malnutrition          (n=100)     (n=100)       (n=100)        (n=100)       (n=100)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mild                    10          11            13             28             4
Moderate                16          27            19              5            20
Severe                   1           8            13              6            19

Changes in nutritional status during hospitalisation

Altogether, 112 patients were reassessed on discharge. Table VI shows that weight loss had occurred in 20 (69%) of the 29 overweight patients, 11 (39%) of the 28 normally nourished patients, and 41 (75%) of the 55 undernourished patients. Weight gain was observed in two of the overweight patients, six of the normally nourished patients, two mildly undernourished patients, six moderately undernourished patients, and six severely undernourished patients.

Weight loss during hospitalisation resulted in patients' nutritional status being recategorised: two (7%) of the overweight patients lost weight to within the normal weight range, while another two became moderately undernourished; five (26%) of the mildly undernourished patients became moderately undernourished; and seven (37%) of the moderately undernourished patients became severely undernourished. No patient moved from the undernourished groups to the normal or overweight groups. All the patient groups showed a greater weight loss than weight gain except for the severely undernourished group. Weight loss was accompanied by corresponding changes in triceps skinfold thickness and mid-arm muscle circumference.


TABLE VI - Changes in weight during hospitalisation among 112 patients who
were reassessed on discharge. Values are numbers unless stated otherwise
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Patient's status on admission

                                                                Undernourished

                           Overweight      Normal        Mild       Moderate       Severe
Weight change                (n=29)        (n=28)       (n=19)       (n=19)        (n=17)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
None                          7             11            0            0             0
Weight loss:                 20             11           17           13            11
 Mean weight loss (%)         5.4            5.3          5.3          9.7           6.4
Weight gain:                  2              6            2            6             6
 Mean weight gain (%)         2.3            3.4          3.4          4.4           8.1

Referral for nutritional support

Of the 55 undernourished patients reassessed on discharge, 10 had been referred for nutritional support (three for parenteral feeding and seven for enteral tube feeding). Seven of these patients gained weight compared with five of the 45 patients not referred for nutritional support (P<0.001), and only one of those referred lost weight compared with 36 of those not referred (P<0.001). The mean weight gain in the referred group was 7.9% (range 2.4-22.2%, P<0.001), while the mean weight loss in the group not referred was 7.2% (range 1.9-15.2%, P<0.001).

Case note review

Of the 200 patients undernourished on admission, 104 had no nutritional information in their case notes. At the outpatient visit preceding admission 31 patients had their height recorded and 47 had their weight documented. Comments relating to changes in appetite and weight were recorded for 11 and 20 of these patients respectively. Nutritional depletion was recorded in six cases, and referral for nutritional advice was documented in four cases. Eighteen of the undernourished patients with nutritional information in their case notes were elective admissions. These patients would be likely to have nutritional intervention at an earlier date, and three of them did receive nutritional advice when they were admitted to hospital. During admission, one patient's height was recorded, six patients' weight was recorded, 37 patients had weight change recorded, 35 patients had appetite change recorded, 13 patients had documented evidence of depletion, and 10 patients had documented referral for nutritional advice.

Discussion

We identified the prevalence of malnutrition on admission to hospital in patients with a wide variety of disease states. The criteria we used to determine malnutrition were derived from previously published studies. Data on body mass index and mid-arm circumference were compared with data previously published for the population of the United Kingdom, and the nutritional status of the patients on admission to hospital was significantly poorer than that of the general population. The overall prevalence of undernutrition on admission to hospital was 40%.

Among the 112 patients who were reassessed on discharge, all of the nutritional status groups showed a greater weight loss than weight gain except for the severely undernourished group. The reason for this may be that this group was more likely to have been referred for nutritional support during admission. The greatest weight loss occurred in those patients who were already depleted on admission: 78% of them deteriorated nutritionally during hospitalisation. Of the undernourished patients who were reassessed, 18% had been referred for nutritional support. Seventy per cent of the patients who were referred gained weight, while 80% of the undernourished patients who were not referred for nutritional support lost weight.

We did not carry out a biochemical assessment of nutritional status because of a lack of a reliable biochemical marker of nutritional status. Albumin concentrations respond slowly to protein restriction and are more a reflection of the illness of a patient than of nutrient intake. Transferrin is more sensitive, having a shorter half life, but may be elevated during infection and stress and with concurrent iron deficiency. Thyroxin binding prealbumin and retinol binding protein both respond to nutritional intake but are also affected by disease process.

The limited amount of documented information relating to nutrition at outpatient visits and on admission to hospital highlights the continued problem of lack of awareness of nutrition. Awareness of the importance of nutritional status by general practitioners may afford intervention at an earlier stage and allow nutritional status to improve before admission to hospital.

Our study was carried out in an acute teaching hospital which has had an active nutrition advisory group since 1980. Facilities to determine and to deal with nutritional problems exist in most hospitals. Evaluation of nutritional status is important in determining patients who are at risk of developing nutrition related complications and for monitoring the efficacy of intervention. Methods of nutritional assessment need not be costly or time consuming. Anthropometric measurements are simple, cheap, and non-invasive, and technique improves with practice.

Techniques for the provision of artificial nutritional support are becoming increasingly sophisticated. However, there remains a need for improved recognition of malnutrition and an appreciation of the treatment of nutrition related complications. This suggests a need for improved undergraduate and postgraduate education about clinical nutrition.

  1. Bistrian BR, Blackburn GL, Vitale J, Cochran D, Naylor J. Prevalence of malnutrition in general medical patients. JAMA 1976;253:1567-70.
  2. Hill GL, Pickford I, Young GA, Schorach CJ, Blackett RL, Burkinshaw L, et al. Malnutrition in surgical patients: an unrecognised problem. Lancet 1977;i:689-92.
  3. Bistrian BR, Blackburn GL, Hallowell E, Heddle R. Protein status of general surgical patients. JAMA 1974;230:858-60. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Pinchcofsky GD, Kaminski MV. Increasing malnutrition during hospitalisation: documentation by a nutritional screening program. J Am Coll Nutr 1985;4:471-9. [Abstract]
  5. Keys AJ, Brozek J, Henschel O, Michelson O, Taylor HL. In: The biology of human starvation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1950;140-60.
  6. Arora NS, Rochester DF. Respiratory muscle strength and maximal voluntary ventilation in undernourished patients. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982;126:5-8. [Medline]
  7. Heymsfield SB, Bethel RA, Ansley JD, Gibbs DM, Felner JM, Nutter DO. Cardiac abnormalities in cachectic patients before and during nutritional repletion. Am Heart J 1978;95:584-94. [Medline]
  8. Windsor JA, Hill GL. Risk factors for post operative pneumonia: the importance of protein depletion. Ann Surg 1988;17:181-5.
  9. Robinson G, Goldstien M, Levine GM. Impact of nutritional status on DRG length of stay. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1987;11:49-51. [Abstract]
  10. Reilly JJ, Hull SF, Albert N, Waller A, Bringardener S. Economic20impact of malnutrition: a model system for hospitalized patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1988;12:372-6.
  11. Bishop CW, Bowen PE, Ritchley SI. Norms for nutritional assessment of American adults by upper arm anthropometry. Am J Clin Nutr 1981;34:2530-9. [Free Full Text]
  12. Burr ML, Phillips KM. Anthropometric norms in the elderly. Br J Clin Nutr 1984;51:165-9.
  13. Gregory J, Foster K, Tyler H, Wiseman M. The dietary and nutritional survey of20British adults. London: HMSO, 1990.
  14. Webb AE, Newman LA, Taylor M, Keogh JB. Hand grip dynamometry as a20predictor of post operative complications. Re- appraisal using age standardised20grip strengths. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1989;13:30-3. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Garrow JS. Treat obesity seriously. Edinburgh: Churchill20Livingstone, 1981.
  16. Walker MA, Bryce D, Shearer JL, Carter NW. CRAFT - an aid to medical audit, research and patient management. Health Bull (Edinb) 1988;1:42-54.
(Accepted 11 January 1994)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Malnutrition in hospitals
Mike Lean and Martin Wiseman
BMJ 2008 336: 290. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Health and welfare of older people in care homes
Marion E T McMurdo and Miles D Witham
BMJ 2007 334: 913-914. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Koh, W.-J., Kwon, O. J., Gwak, H., Chung, J. W., Cho, S.-N., Kim, W. S., Shim, T. S. (2009). Daily 300 mg dose of linezolid for the treatment of intractable multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. J Antimicrob Chemother 64: 388-391 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Meijers, J. M. M., Candel, M. J. M. M., Schols, J. M. G. A., van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren, M. A. E., Halfens, R. J. G. (2009). Decreasing Trends in Malnutrition Prevalence Rates Explained by Regular Audits and Feedback. J. Nutr. 139: 1381-1386 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Sumukadas, D., Jenkinson, F., Witham, M. D. (2009). Associations and consequences of hypophosphataemia in older hospitalised women. Age Ageing 38: 112-115 [Full text]  
  • DiMaria-Ghalili, R. A. (2008). Nutrition Risk Factors in Older Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients. Nutr Clin Pract 23: 494-500 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Behara, A. S., Peterson, S. J., Chen, Y., Butsch, J., Lateef, O., Komanduri, S. (2008). Nutrition Support in the Critically Ill: A Physician Survey. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 32: 113-119 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Lean, M., Wiseman, M. (2008). Malnutrition in hospitals. BMJ 336: 290-290 [Full text]  
  • August, D. A., Serrano, D. (2007). Outcomes Research in Specialized Nutrition Support. Nutr Clin Pract 22: 602-608 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Brotherton, A. M., Carter, B. (2007). Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Feeding in Nursing Homes: Relatives' Perceptions. Clin Nurs Res 16: 350-369 [Abstract]  
  • Baccaro, F., Moreno, J. B., Borlenghi, C., Aquino, L., Armesto, G., Plaza, G., Zapata, S. (2007). Subjective Global Assessment in the Clinical Setting. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 31: 406-409 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • McMurdo, M. E T, Witham, M. D (2007). Health and welfare of older people in care homes. BMJ 334: 913-914 [Full text]  
  • Devoto, G., Gallo, F., Marchello, C., Racchi, O., Garbarini, R., Bonassi, S., Albalustri, G., Haupt, E. (2006). Prealbumin Serum Concentrations as a Useful Tool in the Assessment of Malnutrition in Hospitalized Patients. Clin. Chem. 52: 2281-2285 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hosseini, S., Amirkalali, B., Nayebi, N., Heshmat, R., Larijani, B. (2006). Nutrition Status of Patients During Hospitalization, Tehran, Iran. Nutr Clin Pract 21: 518-521 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Chiang-Hanisko, L., Ross, R., Ludwick, R., Martsolf, D. (2006). International collaborations in nursing research: Priorities, challenges and rewards. Journal of Research in Nursing 11: 307-322 [Abstract]  
  • Milne, A. C., Avenell, A., Potter, J. (2006). Meta-Analysis: Protein and Energy Supplementation in Older People. ANN INTERN MED 144: 37-48 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hickson, M (2006). Malnutrition and ageing. Postgrad. Med. J. 82: 2-8 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Magnuson, B. L., Clifford, T. M., Hoskins, L. A., Bernard, A. C. (2005). Enteral Nutrition and Drug Administration, Interactions, and Complications. Nutr Clin Pract 20: 618-624 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Harris, D., Haboubi, N. (2005). Malnutrition screening in the elderly population. JRSM 98: 411-414 [Full text]  
  • Seres, D. S. (2005). Surrogate Nutrition Markers, Malnutrition, and Adequacy of Nutrition Support. Nutr Clin Pract 20: 308-313 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Sergi, G., Perissinotto, E., Pisent, C., Buja, A., Maggi, S., Coin, A., Grigoletto, F., Enzi, G., for the ILSA Working Group, (2005). An Adequate Threshold for Body Mass Index to Detect Underweight Condition in Elderly Persons: The Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging (ILSA). Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 60: 866-871 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Paddon-Jones, D., Sheffield-Moore, M., Urban, R. J., Aarsland, A., Wolfe, R. R., Ferrando, A. A. (2005). The Catabolic Effects of Prolonged Inactivity and Acute Hypercortisolemia Are Offset by Dietary Supplementation. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 90: 1453-1459 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Chandler, M. L., Gunn-Moore, D. A. (2004). Nutritional Status of Canine and Feline Patients Admitted to a Referral Veterinary Internal Medicine Service. J. Nutr. 134: 2050S-2052S [Full text]  
  • Davis, J. P., Wong, A. A., Schluter, P. J., Henderson, R. D., O'Sullivan, J. D., Read, S. J. (2004). Impact of Premorbid Undernutrition on Outcome in Stroke Patients. Stroke 35: 1930-1934 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hamilton-Miller, J M T (2004). Probiotics and prebiotics in the elderly. Postgrad. Med. J. 80: 447-451 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Barr, J., Hecht, M., Flavin, K. E., Khorana, A., Gould, M. K. (2004). Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients Before and After the Implementation of an Evidence-Based Nutritional Management Protocol. Chest 125: 1446-1457 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Stroud, M, Duncan, H, Nightingale, J (2003). Guidelines for enteral feeding in adult hospital patients. Gut 52: vii1-12 [Full text]  
  • Reynolds, N., Johnston, D. A, Dillon, J. F (2002). Christopher Royston Pennington. BMJ 325: 497-497 [Full text]  
  • Pearce, C B, Duncan, H D (2002). Enteral feeding. Nasogastric, nasojejunal, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, or jejunostomy: its indications and limitations. Postgrad. Med. J. 78: 198-204 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Campbell, S.E., Avenell, A., Walker, A.E. (2002). Assessment of nutritional status in hospital in-patients. QJM 95: 83-87 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Thomson, M A, Carverand, A D, Sloan, R L (2002). Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding in a district rehabilitation service. Clin Rehabil 16: 215-220 [Abstract]  
  • Potter, J. M., Roberts, M. A., McColl, J. H., Reilly, J. J. (2001). Protein Energy Supplements in Unwell Elderly Patients--A Randomized Controlled Trial. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 25: 323-329 [Abstract]  
  • Lewis, S. J, Egger, M., Sylvester, P. A, Thomas, S. (2001). Early enteral feeding versus ""nil by mouth"" after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMJ 323: 773-773 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bales, C. W (2001). What does it mean to be ""at nutritional risk""? Seeking clarity on behalf of the elderly. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 74: 155-156 [Full text]  
  • Creamer, K. M., Chan, D. S., Sutton, C., DeLeon, C., Moreno, C., Shoupe, B. A. (2001). A Comprehensive Pediatric Inpatient Nutrition Support Package: A Multi-disciplinary Approach. Nutr Clin Pract 16: 246-257 [Abstract]  
  • Akner, G., Cederholm, T. (2001). Treatment of protein-energy malnutrition in chronic nonmalignant disorders. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 74: 6-24 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Chu, L.-W., Lam, K. S. L., Tam, S. C. F., Hu, W. J. H. C., Hui, S.-L., Chiu, A., Chiu, K.-C., Ng, P. (2001). A Randomized Controlled Trial of Low-Dose Recombinant Human Growth Hormone in the Treatment of Malnourished Elderly Medical Patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 86: 1913-1920 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Benbow, S.J., Hoyte, R., Gill, G.V. (2001). Institutional dietary provision for diabetic patients. QJM 94: 27-30 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Paisley, C. M., Tudor-Smith, C. (2001). Food and catering policies in NHS hospitals in Wales. Health Education Journal 60: 327-338 [Abstract]  
  • Sermet-Gaudelus, I., Poisson-Salomon, A.-S., Colomb, V., Brusset, M.-C., Mosser, F., Berrier, F., Ricour, C. (2000). Simple pediatric nutritional risk score to identify children at risk of malnutrition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 72: 64-70 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • POWELL-TUCK, J (2000). Perioperative nutritional support: does it reduce hospital complications or shorten convalescence?. Gut 46: 749-750 [Full text]  
  • Beattie, A H, Prach, A T, Baxter, J P, Pennington, C R (2000). A randomised controlled trial evaluating the use of enteral nutritional supplements postoperatively in malnourished surgical patients. Gut 46: 813-818 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Mandal, A, Steel, A, Davidson, A R, Ashby, C (2000). Day-case percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a viable proposition?. Postgrad. Med. J. 76: 157-159 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kelly, I.E., Tessier, S., Cahill, A., Morris, S.E., Crumley, A., McLaughlin, D., McKee, R.F., Lean, M.E.J. (2000). Still hungry in hospital: identifying malnutrition in acute hospital admissions. QJM 93: 93-98 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Azad, N., Murphy, J., Amos, S. S., Toppan, J. (1999). Nutrition survey in an elderly population following admission to a tertiary care hospital. CMAJ 161: 511-515 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Holmes, S. (1999). Nutrition: a necessary adjunct to hospital care?. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 119: 175-179 [Abstract]  
  • FIACCADORI, E., LOMBARDI, M., LEONARDI, S., ROTELLI, C. F., TORTORELLA, G., BORGHETTI, A. (1999). Prevalence and Clinical Outcome Associated with Preexisting Malnutrition in Acute Renal Failure: A Prospective Cohort Study. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 10: 581-593 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Stratton, R. J., Stubbs, R. J., Elia, M. (1998). Interrelationship Between Circulating Leptin Concentrations, Hunger, and Energy Intake in Healthy Subjects Receiving Tube Feeding. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 22: 335-339 [Abstract]  
  • Potter, J., Langhorne, P., Roberts, M. (1998). Routine protein energy supplementation in adults: systematic review. BMJ 317: 495-501 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Welsh, F K S, Farmery, S M, MacLennan, K, Sheridan, M B, Barclay, G R, Guillou, P J, Reynolds, J V (1998). Gut barrier function in malnourished patients. Gut 42: 396-401 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • (1996). Malnourished inpatients: overlooked and undertreated. DTB 34: 57-60 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Incalzi, R. A., Gemma, A., Capparella, O., Cipriani, L., Landi, F., Carbonin, P. (1996). Energy Intake and In-Hospital Starvation: A Clinically Relevant Relationship. Arch Intern Med 156: 425-429 [Abstract]  
  • McGlone, P., Dickerson, J.W.T., Davies, G. J. (1995). The feeding of patients in hospital: a review. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 115: 282-288 [Abstract]  
  • Charney, P. (1995). Nutrition Assessment in the 1990s: Where Are We Now?. Nutr Clin Pract 10: 131-139 [Abstract]  
  • Avenell, A, George, L, Miller, S, Miller, J M, Lock, M, Vald, V, Royce, C, Taylor, M, Mackay, G (1994). Starvation in hospital. Refer early to a dietitian.. BMJ 308: 1369-1370 [Full text]  
  • Garrow, J (1994). Starvation in hospital. BMJ 308: 934-934 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ