BMJ, doi: 10.1136/bmjusa.01030007, (Published 5 September 2002)

News

Patient privacy rule goes into effect

Charles Marwick, Washington, DC
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

This article originally appeared in BMJ USA

Washington---As the final rule aimed at protecting the privacy of patients' medical records goes into effect, it is giving rise to just as much controversy as it generated when it was being drafted. The criticisms come, not just from health insurers, hospitals, and the health care industry (who say it will impose unacceptable costs), but also from significant segments of the medical profession, such as the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Psychiatric Association (APA). At the same time, among the professional medical groups at least, there is agreement that it is better than nothing. The AMA has long supported patient records protection, but points out that the final rule does not fully achieve that goal.

The rule was issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) at the end of December. It lays out standards for protecting personal . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview