Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Charles Marwick
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
This article originally appeared in BMJ USA
Washington
As the final rule aimed at protecting the
privacy of patients' medical records goes into effect, it is giving
rise to just as much controversy as it generated when it was being drafted. The criticisms come, not just from health insurers, hospitals, and the health care industry (who say it will impose unacceptable costs), but also from significant segments of the medical profession, such as the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Psychiatric Association (APA). At the same time, among the professional medical groups at least, there is agreement that it is better than
nothing. The AMA has long supported patient records protection, but
points out that the final rule does not fully achieve that goal.
The rule was issued by the Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS) at the end of December. It lays out standards for protecting
personal
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.