Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 4 February 2010, doi:10.1136/bmj.c719
Cite this as: BMJ 2010;340:c719
Susan Mayor
1 London
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Leading stem cell researchers have expressed concern that some reviewers may be hampering publication of high quality research in the field and are calling for a more open process of review to prevent this.
Their concerns echo those expressed in a letter sent last summer to the editors of science journals by 10 stem cell researchers from around the world. The letter claimed that "papers that are scientifically flawed or comprise only modest technical increments often attract undue profile. At the same time publication of truly original findings may be delayed or rejected" (http://eurostemcell.org/commentanalysis/peer-review).
The letter followed a major conference, the EuroSyStem/European Molecular Biology Organisation Conference on Advances in Stem Cell Research, at which researchers shared their frustration at sometimes receiving what they considered to be "unreasonable or obstructive reviews." To improve the situation, they proposed that when a paper is published, the reviews, response to reviews and
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati
Twitter What's this?