Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 29 September 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b3957
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3957
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Juurlink and colleagues show that pioglitazone has fewer adverse cardiovascular outcomes than rosiglitazone, which may be a class effect.1 However, recent reports show that thiazolidinediones are associated with increased incidence of fractures.
By 2007 the manufacturers of pioglitazone had advised health professionals about the risk of fractures in women on the basis of clinical trial data outcomes.2 Recent reports show that both men and women who take thiazolidinediones for diabetes could be at increased risk of distal fractures of upper and lower limbs,3 4 5 the risk increasing with age.
The black box warning from the US Food and Drug Administration a few years after the introduction of thiazolidinediones, the withdrawal of troglitazone because of rare cases of severe hepatotoxicity, and the increased risk of fractures have raised concerns. Do the benefits of treatment outweigh the risks? Are thiazolidinediones the treatment of choice for type 2 diabetes?
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3957
Alok Dixit, assistant professor1, Pinki Pandey, assistant professor1
1 M M Institute of Medical Science and Research, Mullana, Ambala, India 133203
alkdxt@yahoo.co.in
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?