Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 29 September 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b3898
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3898
Professional standards need to be clarified and acted on
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Doctors and other healthcare professionals have been involved in facilitating both legitimate and illegitimate performance enhancement in sport.1 2 The recent "bloodgate" affair in Rugby Union shows that healthcare professionals can be involved in producing fake injuries in situations where the apparent "injury" creates an advantage for the team.3
The incident happened last April at the semifinals of the European Rugby Cup match between Harlequins and the eventual winners Leinster. Normally in Rugby Union players cannot return to play once they have been substituted except to replace a player who has a "blood injury." A Harlequins player produced an apparent blood injury through the use of a fake blood capsule so that a specialist goal kicker could be brought back on to the field to try to secure victory in the last few minutes. At the behest of the head coach, the team physiotherapist had purchased fake blood capsules in advance
Søren Holm, professor of bioethics1,2, Michael McNamee, professor of applied ethics3
1 Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, School of Law, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL , 2 Section for Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, 3 Department of Philosophy, History and Law, School of Health Science, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP
Correspondence to: S Holm soren.holm@manchester.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses