Published 22 September 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b3490
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3490

Practice

Diagnosis in General Practice

Iterative diagnosis

Geoff Norman, assistant dean, programme for educational research and development1, Kevin Barraclough, general practitioner2, Lisa Dolovich, research director, department of family medicine1, David Price, chair, department of family medicine1

1 Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University,1200 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 3Z5, 2 Painswick GL6 6TY

Correspondence to: G Norman, Program for Educational Research and Development Room 3510, MDCL, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University,1200 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 3Z5 norman@mcmaster.ca

Strategies for improving the pattern recognition involved in making a correct diagnosis amount to forcing yourself to use analytical reasoning; diagnosis of vertigo (doi:10.1136/bmj.b3493) is an example

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The traditional model of diagnosis is one of initial collection of information in the history and examination, followed by deductive steps to reach a diagnosis. We suspect that most clinicians do not recognise or use this process.

A more realistic model was formulated by Elstein and Schwarz 25 years ago.1 It was called the hypothetico-deductive model, but we will call it the process of iterative diagnosis. This model recognises that clinical reasoning usually involves the clinician generating one or more possible hypotheses early on in the consultation (often, but not always, by pattern recognition2) and then recurrently—iteratively—testing these. Clinicians use many such shortcuts (heuristics) in clinical reasoning. This is not a fault: the shortcuts are typically correct and allow them to arrive at a working diagnosis with the minimum of delay, while avoiding excessive testing and anxiety. Exhaustive data collection without hypotheses—the medical student’s history and examination—usually does not . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Vertigo
Kevin Barraclough and Adolfo Bronstein
BMJ 2009 339: b3493. [Extract] [Full Text]

Test of time
Susanna C Almond and Nick Summerton
BMJ 2009 338: b1878. [Extract] [Full Text]

Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: selective review of the cognitive literature
Arthur S Elstein and Alan Schwarz
BMJ 2002 324: 729-732. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Barraclough, K., Bronstein, A. (2009). Vertigo. BMJ 339: b3493-b3493 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Standing the test of time.
John P Coffey
bmj.com, 25 Sep 2009 [Full text]
The seventh strategy
Mark A Vorster, et al.
bmj.com, 30 Sep 2009 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ