Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 22 September 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b3111
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3111
Eric S Kilpatrick, honorary professor in clinical biochemistry1, Michael J Lind, foundation professor of oncology 2
1 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull HU3 2JZ, 2 Academic Department of Oncology, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham
Correspondence to: ES Kilpatrick Eric.Kilpatrick@hey.nhs.uk
Tumour markers have a limited role, if any, in initial investigations, but they can be important in following up patients with known malignancy
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
A 54 year old woman presented to her general practitioner with swelling of her abdomen, general malaise, and weight loss of about 5 kg during the preceding three months. On examination, she had a slightly distended abdomen and evidence of ascites. No masses could be felt.
The general practitioner ordered routine biochemistry tests as well as requesting CA125, CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen), and CA19.9 tumour markers, as he believed these would help him judge the likelihood of ovarian, colonic, and pancreatic cancers. The results of these and routine biochemistry are shown in the table
.
|
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses