Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 16 September 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b3750
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3750
Rebecca Coombes, journalist
1 BMJ, London WC1H 9JR
rcoombes@bmjgroup.com
Reducing our consumption of the earths resources is made more difficult by a burgeoning population, so why is reproductive health struggling for funds? Rebecca Coombes reports
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Talking about contraception puts Apio Christine Peace, a Ugandan health worker, in a pessimistic mood. Peace, who is currently working for Care International in a refugee camp in the war ravaged north of her country, would like more Ugandan women to be given the means to control their fertility, not least because Uganda has one of the worlds fastest growing populations, projected to triple by 2050 to about 103 million citizens.1 She highlights her concern about Ugandas ability to sustain such a rapid growth in population by pointing out the gradual loss of the countrys natural forests. Poor agricultural practices and overpopulation are causing the erosion.
"Part of the forest reserve was recently given over to a soft drinks plant. I just think the government isnt committed to the environment. There is poor provision of family planning services, and so the population is on the increase. Women do want control
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses