Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 14 September 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b3682
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3682
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Lord Carliles views are well known,1 2 but many can envisage differing thresholds and circumstances that are worse than death and not restricted to terminal illness. Since life itself is a terminal condition, there is a refreshing sense of realism in the possibility under Swiss law of assisted suicide in cases of unbearable suffering that is not the result of a terminal illness.
The attack on the World Trade Centre evidently led to some people committing suicide by leaping from the windows rather than suffer prolonged injury and death from the fire. Following these terrible circumstances, some people with religious convictions found comfort in knowing that the death of a relative had arisen from the unfolding alternatives rather than a deliberate act of suicide.3 In the current and different context should one be constrained to the alternatives for the religious reasons of others, or by the concerns of those who would
Malcolm Bowker, retired consultant psychiatrist1
1 Cheshire
Malcbowk@aol.com