Published 11 September 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b3678
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3678

Editorials

Does improving quality of care save money?

Higher quality is mainly driven by professional reasons, which does not necessarily lower costs

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

As the NHS enters a period of little or no real growth in funding but incessant demand and cost pressures,¹ the idea that improving the quality of services, treatment, and care could actually save money is an attractive proposition. But although there is plenty of evidence that poor quality health care and adverse events are costly both for the NHS in financial terms and for patients in terms of health consequences, there is, as a new report reveals, a dearth of evidence of the reverse relation: that improving quality leads to lower costs.²

In a wide ranging literature review for the Health Foundation, John Øvretveit unearths just eight reasonably robust and well researched examples—mainly from the US—where service or clinical change has led to identifiable savings. These include annual savings of $0.7 million from reducing deep surgical wound infection rates and $0.3 million from earlier patient discharge and reductions in . . . [Full text of this article]

¹ The King’s Fund, London

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

The blind leading the disempowered

Peter J Mahaffey
BMJ 2009 339: b4067. [Extract] [Full Text]

The crooked timber of humanity

T Delamothe
BMJ 2009 339: b3813. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Mahaffey, P. J (2009). The blind leading the disempowered. BMJ 339: b4067-b4067 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

the blind leading the dis-empowered

Peter J Mahaffey
bmj.com, 20 Sep 2009 [Full text]

Allow patients to choose their PCT

David Allen
bmj.com, 24 Sep 2009 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more here>> and here>>