Published 3 September 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b3471
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3471

Analysis

Calibrated response to emerging infections

¹ Program in History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology and Society, E51-070, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

WHO has revised its definition of pandemic flu in response to current experience with A/H1N1. Peter Doshi argues that our plans for pandemics need to take into account more than the worst case scenarios

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The current flu pandemic raises a public health policy question that could have been asked after the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): what is the proper response to clinically mild or epidemiologically limited (small number) outbreaks caused by new viruses? Over the past four years, pandemic preparations have focused on responding to worst case scenarios. As a result, officials responded to the H1N1 outbreak as an unfolding disaster. Measures were taken that in hindsight may be seen as alarmist, overly restrictive, or even unjustified. Assumptions about the nature of emerging infections along with advanced laboratory surveillance have changed the way we understand epidemics and we need a new framework for thinking about epidemic disease.

Before the arrival of novel A/H1N1 virus, pandemics were said to occur when a new subtype of influenza virus to which humans have no immunity enters the population, begins spreading widely, and causes severe . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

By any maths would be as weak

Ron Law
BMJ 2009 339: b3959. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Law, R. (2009). By any maths would be as weak. BMJ 339: b3959-b3959 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Spanish "common sense and self control policy" concerning Swine Flu

Tiago Villanueva, et al.
bmj.com, 5 Sep 2009 [Full text]

60-90 Million already infected

Ron Law
bmj.com, 5 Sep 2009 [Full text]

Out of the mouths of babes...

Mark McConnell
bmj.com, 6 Sep 2009 [Full text]

Yes, but....

John Stone
bmj.com, 7 Sep 2009 [Full text]

In the information society, nobody thinks!

BM Hegde
bmj.com, 7 Sep 2009 [Full text]

Response to emerging infections already calibrated

Stephen B Lambert
bmj.com, 9 Sep 2009 [Full text]

Mass vaccination against swine flu; could it cause more harm than good?

Peter J Collignon
bmj.com, 11 Sep 2009 [Full text]

Out of the mouths of babes aka The Emperor's New Clothes revisited

Dr Viera Scheibner
bmj.com, 12 Sep 2009 [Full text]

Australian data.

Peter J Flegg
bmj.com, 13 Sep 2009 [Full text]

Because it is a new virus will no one have immunity to it?

Dr.Nadaraja Bathirunathan
bmj.com, 13 Sep 2009 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more>>