Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 21 October 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b4293
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b4293
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In 1991, in the week that the Food and Drug Administration held regulatory hearings on fluoxetine and suicide, the BMJ published an article by Lilly employees exonerating fluoxetine, although the article showed a clear increase in risk with treatment and included under the heading of placebo a suicide that had not happened in the randomised phase of the trials.1 2 This likely played a part in the way academics worldwide viewed the issues. Since then, in my experience, in the run up to major legal trials or regulatory hearings linked to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), one or other major journal has run an article exonerating the drug(s).
In the BMJ of 26 September Pedersen and colleagues article on birth defects and SSRIs points to a risk with treatment.3 It is accompanied by an editorial minimising these risks by Chambers,4 who has co-authored other pieces advocating the treatment of antenatal depression
David Healy, professor1
1 Department of Psychiatry, Cardiff University
HealyD@cardiff.ac.uk