Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 21 October 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b4282
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b4282
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Capsule endoscopy has become an essential tool in investigating small bowel disease.1 However, a recent paper describes its limitations compared with optical colonoscopy in detecting both polyps and cancers.2
Whereas capsule colonoscopy seems less invasive, it still requires bowel preparation, which many patients find as unpleasant as undergoing optical colonoscopy. Furthermore, in their study of 328 cases Van Gossum et al found that its sensitivity and specificity in detecting colonic polyps greater than 6 mm was only 64% and 84% respectively compared with optical colonoscopy.2 Similarly, of 19 cancers diagnosed at optical colonoscopy, only 14 were detected by capsule endoscopy. Currently optical colonoscopy can be performed in a suboptimally cleansed colon, with the possibility of clearing colonic debris during the procedure, and insufflating air into collapsed intestines. This is not the case for capsule colonoscopy.
These data show that capsule endoscopy is not a screening tool for colonic neoplasia but
Andy Li, consultant gastroenterologist1
1 Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust
andy.li@wsht.nhs.uk