Published 21 October 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b4282
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b4282

Letters

Capsule endoscopy

Technique has limitations

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Capsule endoscopy has become an essential tool in investigating small bowel disease.1 However, a recent paper describes its limitations compared with optical colonoscopy in detecting both polyps and cancers.2

Whereas capsule colonoscopy seems less invasive, it still requires bowel preparation, which many patients find as unpleasant as undergoing optical colonoscopy. Furthermore, in their study of 328 cases Van Gossum et al found that its sensitivity and specificity in detecting colonic polyps greater than 6 mm was only 64% and 84% respectively compared with optical colonoscopy.2 Similarly, of 19 cancers diagnosed at optical colonoscopy, only 14 were detected by capsule endoscopy. Currently optical colonoscopy can be performed in a suboptimally cleansed colon, with the possibility of clearing colonic debris during the procedure, and insufflating air into collapsed intestines. This is not the case for capsule colonoscopy.

These data show that capsule endoscopy is not a screening tool for colonic neoplasia but . . . [Full text of this article]

Andy Li, consultant gastroenterologist1

1 Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust

andy.li@wsht.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Capsule endoscopy
Andrea Moglia, Andrea Pietrabissa, and Alfred Cuschieri
BMJ 2009 339: b3420. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ