Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 8 October 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b4035
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b4035
Michael Millar, consultant microbiologist
1 Department of Infection, Barts and The London NHS Trust, London E1 2ES
michael.millar@bartsandthelondon.nhs.uk
Department of Health policy requiring all hospital patients to be screened for MRSA breaches ethical guidelines, argues Michael Millar
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Since April 2009, all patients electively admitted to English hospitals must be screened for meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).1 The requirement will be extended to emergency admissions from next year. Although the policy is presented as a population screening programme, most people who are screened will gain little benefit and may be harmed. The justification for universal screening is therefore unclear.
The Department of Health has taken increasingly stringent measures since 2001 to reduce the burden of infection associated with MRSA. The measures seem to have been successful, with the numbers of MRSA bloodstream infections falling by more than half from 2003 to 2008. However, the overall numbers of healthcare associated infections reported to the English Health Protection Agency rose substantially, raising questions about the focus on MRSA.2 3
Before April 2009 most NHS trusts screened patients for MRSA when they were considered to be at high risk of MRSA colonisation
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses