Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 6 October 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b3923
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3923
Helen Richards, GP principal and partner, Inverness
Helen.cowan3@btinternet.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The first challenge when defending continuity of care is to define it adequately. Theorists have suggested three types of continuity: informational continuity, which includes both formally recorded information and information residing in the memories of clinicians; management continuity, the application of care pathways and coordination of care; and relationship continuity, the clinicians accumulated knowledge of each patients circumstances and preferences.
To me—and I suspect to most GPs—personal continuity includes elements of all three but also goes further. Personal continuity means taking responsibility for the care of registered patients over an extended period of time; being the first point of contact in most episodes of illness; understanding the patients health in the context of their family, social networks, and wider community; and coordinating care in an increasingly complex healthcare system.
Personal continuity is valued by patients, especially those with multiple morbidities, convoluted health narratives, and complex social circumstances and by those
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses