Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 5 October 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b3926
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3926
Yvonne Doyle, regional director of public health1, Martin McKee, professor of European public health2,3, Bernd Rechel, researcher2,3, Emily Grundy, professor of demographic gerontology3
1 NHS South East Coast, Horley, Surrey RH6 7DE, 2 European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies , 3 London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Correspondence to: Y Doyle yvonne.doyle@southeastcoast.nhs.uk
Increased longevity poses a challenge to the welfare state, but the problems can be overcome, argue Yvonne Doyle and colleagues
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The welfare state is based on a life course that no longer matches current experience. It assumes that people, or at least men and unmarried women, spend their early years in education and then go on to a long period in work followed by a short period in retirement, when they live off the pension accumulated while in work or, more usually, the tax and pension contributions of those still in work. At a time when many people did not survive to draw their pensions or, if they did, survived for only a few more years, welfare systems coped reasonably well. It is less clear whether they will be able to do so in the future. The scale of the challenge is shown by a single stark statistic. If there is no change in work and retirement patterns, the ratio of workers to older inactive persons in the countries that
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses