Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 11 November 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b4678
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b4678
Tony Delamothe, deputy editor, BMJ
tdelamothe@bmj.com
The governments commitment to evidence based policy is belied by its ministers initiatives on drug misuse, dementia, and screening
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
As the parent of offspring who fit both the ecstasy taking and horse riding demographic, my ears pricked up at the claim that horse riding was more dangerous than ecstasy. It turns out to be true. If you track down Professor David Nutts editorial in the Journal of Psychopharmacology (2009;23:3-5, doi:10.1177/0269881108099672) youll see that horse riding is associated with acute harm once every 350 episodes and that the figure for ecstasy is once every 10 000 episodes.
The then home secretary, Jacqui Smith, told Professor Nutt, the then chairman of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, that she was "profoundly disappointed" by his comparison. That Ms Smith was profoundly disappointed by this truth made a deeper impression on me than Professor Nutts original statement on relative risk.
Since then Ms Smith has returned to the backbenches in a welter of revelations and recriminations over expense claims
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses