Published 4 November 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b4564
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b4564

Views & Reviews

Personal View

The highs and lows of policy based evidence

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Remember George W Bush? For him it was simple. If a scientist told him an inconvenient truth, the messenger was fired, and someone more compliant got the job. In every area from global warming to the existence of weapons of mass destruction he chose to base policy on fantasy and wishful thinking. It seems that the UK home secretary, Alan Johnson, has something in common with Bush. When the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) said something he didn’t like, its chairman, David Nutt, got fired (BMJ 2009;339:b4563, doi:10.1136/bmj.b4563).

In a democracy there is no doubt that decisions must be made by politicians. Sceptical though one may be about politicians, I’m not sure that I’d want to live in a country ruled by scientists. Politicians have wider responsibilities than scientists, and they can be voted out if we don’t like the decisions. Why, then, the . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Scientists want more protection after government adviser is sacked

Clare Dyer
BMJ 2009 339: b4563. [Extract] [Full Text]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

A crisis of mistrust

Mark Struthers
bmj.com, 10 Nov 2009 [Full text]

Truth itself is the ultimate victim

stephen black
bmj.com, 12 Nov 2009 [Full text]

Re: A crisis of mistrust

John Stone
bmj.com, 12 Nov 2009 [Full text]

Seeing the light

L Sam Lewis
bmj.com, 13 Nov 2009 [Full text]

Our best chance ever!

Steven Ford
bmj.com, 15 Nov 2009 [Full text]

Independent?

John Stone
bmj.com, 23 Nov 2009 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more>>