Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 29 July 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.40018.430972.4D
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3057
Jane Feinmann, freelance journalist
1 London
jane@janefeinmann.com
Jane Feinmann assesses initiatives that challenge the idea that doctors cannot afford to apologise when something goes wrong
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
"To err is human; to cover up is unforgivable." So said Englands chief medical officer, Liam Donaldson, at the World Health Organizations world alliance for patient safety in 2004. In doing so he put an authoritative stamp on growing recognition that when mistakes are made, open disclosure and apologising to patients are essential for safe, effective medicine. Open disclosure is full and frank communication with a patient and his or her family after an incident that may have resulted in harm to that patient.
Despite widespread support for open disclosure, along with growing public appetite for "revelation, discussion, and resolution,"1 some are concerned that doctors behaviour changes little in the aftermath of an adverse incident. In the United Kingdom, the National Patient Safety Agencys "being open" policy was welcomed when it was introduced in 2005.2 The policy requires trusts to provide information, support, and training to encourage doctors to give
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?