Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 17 July 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2789
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b2789
Lifestyle modification, drug treatment, and evidence based discussion about further interventions are essential
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The management of patients with stable coronary artery disease (especially chronic stable angina) has been extensively debated as pathophysiological concepts, drug treatments, and interventional strategies have evolved. From an initial focus on alleviating symptoms, efforts have moved to managing discrete coronary stenoses with invasive procedures, and more recently to improving survival and reducing myocardial infarction.
It is now well recognised that even a single coronary stenosis indicates generalised atherosclerosis of the coronary and non-coronary vasculature. Mortality, myocardial infarction, and strokes are more closely correlated with the extent of generalised atherosclerosis and the composition of plaques, rather than the severity of specific coronary stenoses. Thus, a patient with extensive "minor" stenosis may carry a higher risk of future myocardial infarction than one with a greater degree of stenosis apparent at only a single site.1 The initial response to atherosclerosis is a compensatory dilatation of the coronary artery. Therefore, angiography underestimates the
Salim Yusuf, professor of medicine, director1, Madhu Natarajan, associate professor of medicine1, Ganesan Karthikeyan, CIHR Canada-HOPE scholar1, David Taggart, professor of cardiovascular surgery2
1 Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8L 2X2, 2 John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU
yusufs@mcmaster.ca