Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 9 July 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2054
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b2054
Intensive, multicomponent programmes are not always effective
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Youth development programmes aimed at reducing pregnancy rates and health risk behaviour in teenagers have received strong support in many countries. Proponents of such programmes claim that they are holistic and can focus on the supports, opportunities, and services needed for success; they can tackle multiple risk behaviours, which are thought to be inter-related; and they can help build protective factors as well as reduce risk factors.
One of the most effective youth development programmes, the Childrens Aid Society (CAS) Carrera programme, reduced pregnancy by about a half over three years. Its results have been widely reported,1 and this has led to the implementation of formally sanctioned CAS Carrera programmes, unsanctioned CAS Carrera-type programmes, and other types of youth development programmes.
In the linked matched comparison study (doi:10.1136/bmj.b2534), Wiggins and colleagues evaluated a programme based on the CAS Carrera programme and other youth development programmes.2 This programme did
Douglas Kirby, senior research scientist
1 ETR Associates, Scotts Valley, CA 95066, USA
dougk@etr.org
Read all Rapid Responses