Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 3 July 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1645
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b1645
New data raise concerns, but dont yet warrant a substantial change in practice
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The retrospective cohort study by Kempen and colleagues (doi:) forces us to take a hard look at two of the most pressing questions in drug treatment today.1 The first is what are the longer term risks of the increasingly powerful drugs we now prescribe routinely? The second relates to "pharmacoepistemology"—the question of "how we know what we know" about the risks and benefits of drugs.2
On the first topic, clinicians, patients, and policymakers must live with the fact that drugs are generally approved on the basis of tests that may last just a few weeks or months, even if the drug is designed to be taken for years. Once short term efficacy is shown—even if it is in comparison with placebo, or by the achievement of a surrogate outcome, such as a laboratory test—subsequent drug effects cannot be systematically tracked. A report by the US Institute of Medicine argued strongly
Jerry Avorn, professor of medicine, Sebastian Schneeweiss, associate professor of medicine
1 Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA
javorn@medsoc.harvard.edu