Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 2 July 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2668
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b2668
Jane Smith, deputy editor, BMJ
jsmith@bmj.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The weekly print BMJ has a familiar rhythm, which those of you who start at the front and work steadily to the back may recognise.
At the front—indeed, most of the way through—we have lots of serious stuff. This week, for example, several articles consider the complexities of diagnosis. Wytze Laméris and colleagues studied 11 diagnostic imaging strategies for acute abdominal pain (doi:10.1136/bmj.b2431). Although computed tomography after radiography was the most sensitive investigation, they conclude that radiography followed by ultrasound, with computed tomography reserved for people with negative or inconclusive ultrasound results, is the best strategy, with good sensitivity and less exposure to radiation. In their accompanying editorial Adrian Dixon and Christopher Watson set these findings in the context of advances in imaging, increasing surgical specialisation, and pressure on beds (doi:10.1136/bmj.b1678). "It will become untenable for a patient to stay in hospital with an undiagnosed abdominal
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses