Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 25 August 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b3422
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3422
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Fortune is naive to believe that "formal legislation to cover physician assisted suicide and euthanasia will make the situation a lot safer both for people at the end of their lives and for those caring for them."1
As a legislator for nearly 20 years, I know the pitfalls of trying to draft legislation and the consequences of it being used as a tool to deal with difficult moral issues that require wisdom and judgment, not legal certitude.
The medical profession is the most toasted of all professions because in the public mind there is no ambivalence as to its purpose. It is there to treat, cure, and care for sick and disabled people. Once lawyers get involved the whole premise changes: bitterness, strife, and serious money take over, families are divided, and suspicion reigns.
Doctors should steer clear of assisted suicide—or more accurately of putting people to death—if they want
Julia Cumberlege, former health minister, House of Lords1
1 House of Lords, London SW1A OPD
cumberlegej@parliament.uk
Read all Rapid Responses