Published 25 August 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b3095
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3095

Views & Reviews

Review of the Week

Men behaving madly

An elegant study of the "genderisation" of hysteria prompts Gwen Adshead to ask which of today’s psychiatric disorders will be shown by some future historian to be just as socially constructed

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Few terms in medicine generate such passionate and conflicting responses from professionals as hysteria. From Egyptian times through the early modern and modern period to the present day, hysteria has been discussed and argued over by doctors. One of the key issues that has caused debate and dissent is whether it affects only women; the "genderisation" of hysteria is the subject of Mark Micale’s interesting book.

It reviews the history of the concept of hysteria and its discussion in the professional literature at various times but especially the Renaissance and the Georgian and the Victorian periods. Micale also uses examples from contemporary fictional literature as contrast and comparison, to good effect. He has two main theses. The first is that emotional distress in men was recognised as a disorder in the Renaissance and Georgian era but that from the 19th century cultural pressure made it "unmasculine" for men to show . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Treatments of homosexuality in Britain since the 1950s—an oral history: the experience of patients

Glenn Smith, Annie Bartlett, and Michael King
BMJ 2004 328: 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Online poll

Find out more here>> and here>>