Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 4 August 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b3139
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3139
Janice Hopkins Tanne
1 New York
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Prominent academic doctors and a medical students leader have criticised continuing medical education funded by industry at a hearing of the US Senate Special Subcommittee on Aging.
However, a representative of the accrediting group defended its work. Murray Kopelow said that his group had recently put in place stronger guidelines on industry funding.
The Senate committees hearing, chaired by Herb Kohl, a Wisconsin Democrat, on 29 July 2009, focused on conflicts of interest in the continuing medical education courses that most US doctors have to take.
Industry funding for accredited continuing medical education increased from $302m (£180m;
210m) in 1998 to $1.2bn in 2006 and accounts for about half of the funding for continuing education.
"Large corporations do not typically spend these sums unless they think they will get something out of it," Senator Kohl said. Senators Kohl and Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican, are sponsors of the Physician Payments
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?