Published 27 May 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2109
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b2109

Views & Reviews

Personal View

Euthanasia and free speech in Ireland

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

I have long argued that both non-voluntary and voluntary euthanasia should be legalised under conditions that are strictly regulated.^{1 2 3} Indeed it can be said that doctors already practise a form of euthanasia when they withdraw or decide not to initiate life sustaining treatment for severely brain damaged patients. In so doing they are taking positive steps to end lives that they (and others) deem to be of no further benefit to the patients concerned. The moral good inherent in such actions needs to be recognised and embraced. However, because non-voluntary euthanasia is illegal in the United Kingdom, the death that is then clinically managed may be slow and distressing. It is this reality that lies at the heart of the case for the legalisation of active non-voluntary euthanasia.

Competent and terminally ill patients can already make decisions about the burden of continued life when they refuse life sustaining treatment. But . . . [Full text of this article]

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Ignorance and certainty

Jane Smith
BMJ 2009 338: b2156. [Extract] [Full Text]

Why active euthanasia and physician assisted suicide should be legalised

Len Doyal and Lesley Doyal
BMJ 2001 323: 1079-1080. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Ethics and free speech in Ireland

Desmond O'Neill
bmj.com, 1 Jun 2009 [Full text]

the argument

benedict j mccaffrey
bmj.com, 1 Jun 2009 [Full text]

re euthanasia and free speech

Julian Abel
bmj.com, 1 Jun 2009 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more on doc2doc >>