Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 21 May 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b728
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b728
Non-invasive ventilation may improve outcomes in selected patients, but the evidence is weak
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
At any given time, 30-70% of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are receiving mechanical ventilatory support; 70-80% of them are rapidly weaned off this support, often within a few days.1 Weaning is more problematic in the remaining 20-30% of patients, usually because of unfavourable respiratory mechanics, residual disease processes, cardiac dysfunction, respiratory muscle weakness, high secretion volumes, or altered mental status. The process of weaning from ventilation may account for more than half the total time spent on the ventilator, and it consumes a considerable number of ICU resources.
Failure of weaning increases the length of stay in the ICU and hospital and exposure to the risks of prolonged ventilation, including ventilator associated pneumonia, respiratory muscle deconditioning, and airway problems such as stenosis.2 3 In the linked systematic review and meta-analysis (doi:10.1136/bmj.b1574), Burns and colleagues ask an important question about how to manage patients who fail initial
Andrew Ferguson, assistant professor of medicine (critical care) and anaesthesia
1 Dalhousie University, Bethune Room 377, Halifax, NS, Canada, B3H 2Y9
andrew.ferguson@dal.ca