Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 19 May 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b940
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b940
New evidence raises questions about current monitoring and treatment recommendations
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Two linked studies provide new insights into the monitoring (doi:10.1136/bmj.b1492) and control (doi:10.1136/bmj.b1665) of blood pressure.1 2 In recent years, emphasis has shifted away from treating hypertension as a separate entity towards treating it in the context of the risk of cardiovascular disease.3 This shift has informed randomised controlled trials, such as the PROGRESS trial, which have looked for (and found) benefits of treating people at high risk (in this case, those with a previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack) with blood pressure lowering agents regardless of their blood pressure.4 It has also influenced guidelines that have recommended lower blood pressure treatment targets for people at higher risk of cardiovascular events.5 6 Within this new paradigm, we continue to titrate the use of antihypertensive drugs against blood pressure measurements. The two linked studies both provide data to challenge this orthodoxy.
Hypertension is perhaps the most common form of
Richard J McManus, clinical senior lecturer1, Jonathan Mant, professor2
1 Primary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, 2 General Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR
r.j.mcmanus@bham.ac.uk
Read all Rapid Responses