Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 11 May 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1914
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1914
Ray Moynihan
1 Byron Bay, New South Wales
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Merck has begun the defence of its anti-arthritis drug rofecoxib (Vioxx) in the Federal Court of Australia, amid revelations that it lobbied to quash similar legal action in Britain, and as a publisher apologised for a journal sponsored by the company.
The United States based company is fighting a class action from more than 1000 Australians, led by Graeme Peterson, who had a heart attack in 2003 after taking rofecoxib for several years.
Over the past month Mr Petersons lawyers have released many internal company documents showing, they claim, how Mercks marketing tried to minimise safety concerns about the drug and to "neutralise" and "discredit" potential critics. They also say that the company created an entire medical journal that appeared to be a legitimate peer reviewed journal but that in reality was simply a "marketing publication" (BMJ 2009;338:b1714, 28 Apr, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1714).
Opening the defence case last week,
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?