Published 6 May 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1812
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1812

Letters

Quality in primary health care

Complexity: a simple approach to quality. Are we there yet?

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

"When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less." So Lewis Carroll’s Humpty Dumpty understood the words he used. Today’s word is "quality," and Heath and colleagues’ specific vagueness of the "way forward" to measure quality in primary care suggests we won’t be able agree what we mean for many years.1

"If you don’t know where you are going, any road will get you there," said the Cheshire Cat. Quality is not a destination: it’s a journey of aspiration and achievement rather than completion. It will always mean different things to different people at different times.

The problem with the quality journey is that, although we may know what route we think we need to take, we don’t know where we are going, or when we are going to get there. Guides like the English NHS quality and outcome framework (QOF) are . . . [Full text of this article]

Terry Kemple, general practitioner1

1 Horfield Health Centre, Bristol BS7 9RR

tk@elpmek.demon.co.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Quality in primary health care: a multidimensional approach to complexity
Iona Heath, Adolfo Rubinstein, Kurt C Stange, and Mieke L van Driel
BMJ 2009 338: b1242. [Extract] [Full Text]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ