Published 25 March 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1252
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1252
Editorials
Managing UK research data for future use
The BMJ is now asking authors for data sharing statements
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
For some time the BMJ has been watching other journals efforts to encourage authors to make raw research data available. Now we are taking part too, by asking authors to include a data sharing statement at the end of each original research article. The statement will explain which additional data—if any—are available, to whom, and how. Those data could range from additional explanatory material to the complete dataset. People allowed access to the data might range from fellow researchers to everyone. And data might be available only on request, accessible online with a password, or openly accessible to all on the web with a link on bmj.com.
We understand that many authors wish to guard data until they have published all their own papers, and we know that data sharing is hard to do. But we hope that authors will, increasingly, set the data free, perhaps after a set period . . . [Full text of this article]
Trish Groves, deputy editor
1 BMJ, London WC1H 9JR

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
-
Financial conflicts should be included in online abstracts
- M Felix Freshwater
BMJ 2009 338: b1934.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Whose rights and whos right?
- Trisha Greenhalgh
BMJ 2009 338: b1499.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Web 3.0 and medicine
- Dean Giustini
BMJ 2007 335: 1273-1274.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Whose data are they anyway?
- Tony Delamothe
BMJ 1996 312: 1241-1242.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Freshwater, M F.
(2009). Financial conflicts should be included in online abstracts. BMJ
338: b1934-b1934
[Full text]
-
Greenhalgh, T.
(2009). Whose rights and who's right?. BMJ
338: b1499-b1499
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- Best practice for publishing trial data in peer-reviewed journals
- I Hrynaszkiewicz
bmj.com, 26 Mar 2009
[Full text]
- Medical Observational Studies
- S. Stanley Young
bmj.com, 28 Mar 2009
[Full text]
- More transparency in medical journals.
- Roger K.A. Allen
bmj.com, 29 Mar 2009
[Full text]
- BMJ opens can of worms
- Trisha Greenhalgh
bmj.com, 30 Mar 2009
[Full text]
- Ethical considerations to data sharing within a postmodernist paradigm.
- Sophie E Park
bmj.com, 2 Apr 2009
[Full text]
- The challenges of data sharing for qualitative health research
- Michael D Gallagher, et al.
bmj.com, 2 Apr 2009
[Full text]
- Lack of Online Financial Transparency is a Potential Financial Conflict
- M Felix Freshwater
bmj.com, 22 Apr 2009
[Full text]
- "Anonymised Raw Trial Data and the Unnecessary Need for Consent"
- Neil McIntosh, et al.
bmj.com, 21 Apr 2009
[Full text]
- Re: Lack of Online Financial Transparency is a Potential Financial Conflict
- Trish Groves
bmj.com, 22 Apr 2009
[Full text]